The second major political dialogue of Burma’s peace process was supposed to begin on February 28.  But reports this week indicate that the meeting will be delayed until March. As Burma’s leaders scramble to bring all the relevant parties to the table, China also is playing a role in getting the process back on track.

ban ki moon
Photo Courtesy of U.N. Photo/Eskinder Debebe

The meeting was delayed because Burma’s government is still trying to persuade ethnic armed organizations who have yet to sign the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement to participate fully in the process. At the moment, any group that wants to take part must first lay down its arms and sign that agreement. That’s a tall order for some of the groups who are in active conflict with Burma’s military.

State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Suu Kyi has made this peace process a priority for the nearly one-year-old government led by her National League for Democracy party.  The effort doesn’t directly address the religious tensions related to the more globally familiar Rohingya issue, but it is intended to end decades of violent conflict between the military and the country’s array of armed organizations seeking recognition for their ethnic groups.

To help bring the parties back to the table, the Union Peace Dialogue Joint Committee, which is made up of representatives from government, the armed groups and the political parties, is holding a series of smaller dialogues. These are being conducted in different regions of the country to address a range of long-standing grievances.   

While the joint committee tries to bring coherence to the process from inside Burma, China has tried to help from the outside.  China and Burma recently held meetings of senior defense and foreign ministry officials to discuss the peace process and the ongoing fighting between the Burma military and ethnic armed groups along the Chinese border. China’s ambassador to Burma encouraged these groups to agree to a ceasefire, and officials in Beijing have urged all parties to commit to a political solution. 

Voices on both sides of the border have called on Beijing to play a larger role in Burma’s peace process, and China’s foreign ministry offered to host talks in Yunnan aimed at mediating a ceasefire agreement. But the effort fell apart in December when the parties could not agree on the structure of the talks.

Meanwhile, the fighting in Burma’s north has continued.  In January, China’s Special Envoy of Asian Affairs met with the Burma Army chief as well as leaders from the armed groups involved and called for a pause in fighting during the Lunar New Year. 

Despite these efforts, China’s ability to influence the dynamics inside Burma is limited. For the March conference to succeed, the military and the groups that haven’t signed the nationwide agreement need to find creative solutions that will help bring all of the key parties to the table.

That means the fighting in the north must stop, so that those involved can begin to build trust with one another. Leadership is critical, and Suu Kyi and her party need to find a balance with the military so they can lead on this issue more effectively.

Related Publications

The United Wa State Army and Burma’s Peace Process

The United Wa State Army and Burma’s Peace Process

Monday, April 29, 2019

By: Bertil Lintner

The United Wa State Army, a force of some twenty-thousand fighters, is the largest of Burma’s ethnic armed organizations. It is also the best equipped, boasting modern and sophisticated Chinese weaponry, and operates a formidable drug empire in the Golden Triangle region. This report examines the history of the Wa people, the United Wa State Army’s long-standing political and military ties to China, and the Wa’s role in Burma’s fragile peace process.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Peace Processes

Myanmar’s 2020 Elections and Conflict Dynamics

Myanmar’s 2020 Elections and Conflict Dynamics

Monday, April 15, 2019

By: Mary Callahan; Myo Zaw Oo

In late 2020, Myanmar will hold a general election for more than a thousand seats in Union, state, and regional legislative bodies. The next year and a half will also see two high-level, conflict-laden processes capture domestic and international attention—the 21st Century Panglong peace conference and possible attempts to repatriate Rohingya refugees. This report evaluates the environment in which the peace process, Rohingya repatriation, and the election intersect and identifies opportunities for mitigating conflict in the run-up to the election.

Electoral Violence; Democracy & Governance; Peace Processes

The Conflict Resource Economy and Pathways to Peace in Burma

The Conflict Resource Economy and Pathways to Peace in Burma

Monday, November 19, 2018

By: Kevin M. Woods

Burma’s natural resource economy is inextricably tied to the ongoing armed conflict within the country. Questions of who has what ownership rights over what resources and how these resources can be more equitably shared with the wider population loom large. This report focuses on Burma’s resource-rich ethnic states and territories near the borders with China and Thailand and suggests that a more robust, accountable, and equitable system for managing the country’s resource wealth can help lay down the pathways to peace.

Economics & Environment

China’s Role in Myanmar’s Internal Conflicts

China’s Role in Myanmar’s Internal Conflicts

Friday, September 14, 2018

By: USIP China Myanmar Senior Study Group

This report is the first in the Senior Study Groups (SSGs) series that USIP is convening to examine China's influence on conflict dynamics around the world. A group of thirteen experts met from February to June 2018 to assess China’s involvement in Myanmar’s internal conflicts, particularly those in Rakhine, Kachin, and Shan states, as well as China’s impact on Myanmar’s overall peace process.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Global Policy; Peace Processes

View All Publications