The past week’s turmoil within Myanmar’s ruling party has underscored the power of the country’s armed forces less than 12 weeks before parliamentary elections that civil society activists and others say are vital to consolidating a democracy following a half century of military rule. Security forces surrounded the headquarters of the ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party last week to enforce an order by President Thein Sein dismissing the party’s leader, Shwe Mann.

A sunk ferry near Pyapon, Myanmar
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times

Shwe Mann’s ouster from the USDP’s chairmanship appeared this week to have triggered a realignment of Myanmar’s political groupings after the country’s main opposition leader, Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, said her National League for Democracy (NLD) is now allied with Shwe Mann. Analysts in Myanmar say the NLD is likely to win a large popular vote for parliament.  Shwe Mann, himself a former army general and the current speaker of parliament, was ousted weeks after having proposed a constitutional amendment that would have reduced the military’s power to veto legislation in the parliament.

“The public would expect that elections [can be] a stepping stone to moving forward the Myanmar democracy process.” –Ye Htut, USIP program specialist

“Shwe Mann’s replacement as party president was the result of long-simmering tensions with both President Thein Sein’s office and [armed forces] Commander-in-Chief Min Aung Hlaing, who felt Shwe Mann was pitting both the party and the parliament against them and becoming too close to NLD leader Aung San Suu Kyi,” said Priscilla Clapp, a USIP senior advisor and former U.S. chief of mission in Myanmar. “The strong-arm tactics used against him, however, may have had the perverse effect of casting Shwe Mann as a popular hero, driving him into open alliance with the NLD, and diminishing the USDP’s popularity in the elections.”

Myanmar, also known as Burma, is struggling with this month’s cyclone and floods, which have uprooted about 200,000 people nationwide and buried entire villages in mud. Communal violence this year, notably between Buddhist and Muslim people in the country’s west, has uprooted more than 100,000 and created a migrant crisis, sending refugees of the Muslim Rohingya community fleeing in boats to Malaysia and elsewhere.

Myanmar’s constitution, passed in 2008 by the military government, guarantees the armed forces a powerful bloc in the nation’s parliament and cabinet. Still, the preparations until now for this year’s election, on November 8, suggest that it will be Myanmar’s freest in 25 years, according to Ye Htut, USIP’s program specialist based in Yangon, the country’s largest city. Clapp also has underscored the importance of the November vote to the political transition currently underway.

In a recent visit to Washington, Ye Htut said public participation in this election already is higher than it was in 2010, when the armed forces controlled the previous parliament vote and thereafter established a nominally civilian government. He described USIP’s efforts to promote social dialogue and the role of civil society in preparing that vote.

Despite Myanmar’s history of elections controlled by the military, popular expectations for this vote have risen with the unprecedented role being played by civil society groups and international election monitors, Ye Htut said.

“The public would expect that elections [can be] a stepping stone to moving forward the Myanmar democracy process,” he said.

Related Publications

South Sudan’s Pitfalls of Power Sharing

South Sudan’s Pitfalls of Power Sharing

Friday, February 16, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Susan Stigant; Aly Verjee

This week, a new proposal for a power sharing government was tabled at the ongoing Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) High Level Revitalization Forum (HLRF) peace talks for South Sudan. An earlier, 2015 peace deal also contained a formula for power sharing; that arrangement failed and the civil war re-ignited a year later. Power sharing arrangements are appropriate if certain conditions are met, but not enough has been done to ensure the latest proposal will overcome the obstacles present in South Sudan, according to Susan Stigant, USIP’s director for Africa programs and Aly Verjee, a visiting expert at USIP and a former senior advisor to the IGAD mediation, who comment on the proposal and suggest how it could be improved.

Democracy & Governance; Fragility and Resilience; Global Policy

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

Sunday, February 11, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Nancy Lindborg; Sarhang Hamasaeed

An international conference opens in Kuwait Monday to plan ways to rebuild Iraq and secure it against renewed extremist violence following the three-year war against ISIS. A USIP team just spent nine days in Iraq for talks with government and civil society leaders, part of the Institute’s years-long effort to help the country stabilize. The Kuwait conference will gather government, business and civil society leaders to consider a reconstruction that Iraq has said could cost $100 billion. USIP’s president, Nancy Lindborg, and Middle East program director, Sarhang Hamasaeed, say any realistic rebuilding plan must focus also on the divisions and grievances in Iraq that led to ISIS’ violence and that still exist.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Violent Extremism

Understanding China’s Response to the Rakhine Crisis

Understanding China’s Response to the Rakhine Crisis

Thursday, February 8, 2018

By: Adrienne Joy

Following attacks on police posts by an armed Rohingya militia in August 2017, reprisals by the Burmese government have precipitated a humanitarian crisis. More than six hundred thousand Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh, where they face an uncertain future. Publicly stating that the root cause of conflict in Rakhine is...

Global Policy

View All Publications