It is said you should never forget where you came from, and I often think that is why I ended up working here at the U.S. Institute of Peace.

Peace Line along Cupar Way, Belfast (Photo: Rory Hyde/Flickr)

  I grew up in Ireland, very close to the border with Northern Ireland, during the time known as the “Troubles.” Over a 30-year period that began in the 1960s, more than 3,500 people were killed on both sides of the conflict, as armed groups on the nationalist side fought for political unity with the rest of Ireland, and armed groups on the unionist side fought for Northern Ireland to remain part of the United Kingdom.  Even before this, there had been a long history of animosity between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland after centuries of British rule.

During the “Troubles,” communities were torn apart by violence and I remember those stories on the news every day.  Growing up in the border area, I remember the heavy fortifications at border crossings, the tension in the air, the divisions so entrenched it seemed they could never be bridged.

And I remember the day the Good Friday Agreement was signed in 1998, a peace agreement that had been years in the making and had taken enormous efforts from so many committed individuals and groups. The U.S. and its envoy, former Senator George Mitchell, played a pivotal role in brokering the landmark agreement. Mitchell describes the effort in a video that forms part of the “Witnesses to Peacebuilding” series in USIP’s Global Peacebuilding Center. It is still widely considered a success story, and held up as a powerful example of the possibility of peacebuilding in the face of a seemingly intractable conflict.

Yet the reality in Northern Ireland is more complicated. Recent news stories highlight the unfinished business of reconciliation in a place where high walls still divide communities in Belfast, and families still seek justice for violent acts committed during the Troubles by perpetrators who have never been charged.

In this context, questions are being raised about what peace really means if justice remains elusive. It is a challenge that has been faced in so many post-conflict situations in which USIP works, and it is a reminder that the hard work of peacebuilding does not end with the signing of formal agreements.

Research cited by the World Bank shows that it can take up to 30 years for countries to establish fully functioning institutions that can help prevent a recurrence of violence. This process of rebuilding necessarily includes the reconstruction of infrastructure and the development of new political systems. But at its core, peacebuilding is about people. It requires healing relationships and finding the common ground on which a new society can stand.

My work at the U.S. Institute of Peace focuses on educating young people about the possibility of peace, and I am constantly motivated from my own experience. It took years of hard work to achieve the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland, and that was a milestone that many thought would never be achieved; that gives me hope.

But the work is not done there, or in Bosnia-Herzegovina, or Rwanda, or in South Africa, or in so many other post-conflict or otherwise transitional countries and regions. It will take continued efforts by committed peacebuilders of all kinds to address unresolved issues from the past that threaten to unravel the future in some of these still-vulnerable places.

Ann-Louise Colgan is director of USIP’s Global Peacebuilding Center.

Related Publications

Conflict Management Training for Peacekeepers French (French)

Conflict Management Training for Peacekeepers French (French)

Friday, February 23, 2018

By: Alison Milofsky; Joseph Sany; Illana M. Lancaster; Jeff Krentel

Ce rapport examine le rôle de la Formation à la gestion des conflits dans la préparation des soldats de la paix aux missions des Nations Unies/de l’Union africaine, à travers une évaluation du programme de Formation à la gestion des conflits pour les soldats de la paix proposée par l’USIP. L’évaluation s’appuie sur des données collectées au travers de 137 entretiens semi-structurés avec des soldats de la paix formés par l’USIP et rentrés au pays, des membres de la communauté dans les zones où des soldats de la paix ont été déployés en mission, et des formateurs de pré-déploiement. Le rapport étudie les résultats de l’évaluation et propose des recommandations non seulement pour la formation de l’USIP à l’intention des soldats de la paix mais aussi pour élargir la portée des politiques et des pratiques en matière de maintien de la paix.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Education & Training

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

Sunday, February 11, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Nancy Lindborg; Sarhang Hamasaeed

An international conference opens in Kuwait Monday to plan ways to rebuild Iraq and secure it against renewed extremist violence following the three-year war against ISIS. A USIP team just spent nine days in Iraq for talks with government and civil society leaders, part of the Institute’s years-long effort to help the country stabilize. The Kuwait conference will gather government, business and civil society leaders to consider a reconstruction that Iraq has said could cost $100 billion. USIP’s president, Nancy Lindborg, and Middle East program director, Sarhang Hamasaeed, say any realistic rebuilding plan must focus also on the divisions and grievances in Iraq that led to ISIS’ violence and that still exist.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Violent Extremism

View All Publications