What Kabul Elites, Washington Officials Are Looking for in Meeting of Presidents Karzai, Obama

With the unseasonably warm weather in Washington this week, you’d think the tulips were out, considering how officialdom is tiptoeing around the subject of Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s visit to confer with President Barack Obama on Jan. 11.

Such meetings have been tension-filled before. This one is particularly critical because decisions about future relations between the two countries are still “very much in flux,” Andrew Wilder, USIP’s director of Afghanistan and Pakistan programs, told National Public Radio. The visit also is being watched closely in Kabul, where Wilder learned on a recent visit that Afghan elites are anxious about the outcome of the meeting.

"That whole dynamic within Afghanistan is generating concerns that a meeting that doesn't go well could lead to a decision to bring home the remaining U.S. troops more quickly than I think most Afghans feel comfortable about,” Wilder told NPR in a Jan. 8 article on its Web site and the accompanying radio broadcast. “They're worried that could be politically destabilizing," he said.

Media outlets have reported this week that continuing tension with Karzai, especially over the terms of the security agreement that will govern the nature, form and legal protections for any continuing U.S. troop presence after 2014, might result in the full contingent of American forces being withdrawn entirely. The U.S. military has pressed for a continuing troop presence that would allow training and logistical support for Afghan security forces as well as counter-terrorism operations against potential militants who threaten the U.S.

Marine General John Allen, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, submitted options to leave 6,000 to 20,000 American troops in the country, a range the Pentagon later changed to between 3,000 and 9,000 to conform with White House requests, the New York Times has reported.

“Both sides have tried over the last year or so to make an effort to warm up relations,” said former Ambassador Omar Samad, USIP’s Afghanistan senior expert in residence, in an interview with Canadian Television (CTV). Tensions have erupted in the past over alleged corruption in Karzai’s government and the Afghan president’s criticism of the U.S. over civilian casualties and sovereignty issues in military operations.

Those stresses are likely to take a back seat during the talks this week in Washington, said Samad, a former Afghan ambassador to France and Canada. Rather, the discussions will focus on the speed of the U.S. and NATO troop drawdown, prospects for reconciliation between the Afghan government and the Taliban and how the U.S. will help Afghanistan after most, if not all, foreign forces withdraw in 2014.

“I think there’s still a chance to save the day, to put Afghanistan back on track, to turn this into some sort of success for all those who contributed, to make sure the sacrifices are not in vain,” Samad told Olive Branch.

Both sides will come with specific policy and strategy demands.

While Karzai is looking for pledges of extensive aid, including military supplies and equipment and continued training for the Afghan National Army and police forces, Obama is likely to emphasize the importance of a credible election in 2014 to choose a successor to Karzai as a virtual precondition for significant external economic and security assistance to continue to flow to Afghanistan.

What’s your bet on which direction U.S.-Afghanistan relations will go after this week’s presidential summit?

Explore Further

Related Publications

Four Lessons for Security Sector Reform in Afghanistan

Four Lessons for Security Sector Reform in Afghanistan

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

By: Jason Criss Howk; Andrew Hyde; Annie Pforzheimer

As Afghan peace talks in Doha move forward, a vital component to the success of any peace deal will be how Afghanistan’s security sector can reform to sustain peace after more than 40 years of violence, and how the international community can best assist. This effort would benefit from recalling the lessons of another time when there was need for a comprehensive reconsideration of Afghanistan’s security sector: the two years immediately following the 2001 overthrow of the Taliban regime. Despite the many important changes, the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) have undergone and a dramatically different context, key lessons from 2002-03 remain relevant to guide thinking ahead of and after a peace agreement.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

What do Afghans think about peace? Just ask their artists.

What do Afghans think about peace? Just ask their artists.

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

By: Johnny Walsh

Historic peace talks between the Taliban and Afghan government began in early September, opening a window for peace after four decades of conflict. Afghans, overwhelmingly weary of war and craving an end to violence, are watching closely. This urge for peace is the most important force motivating the talks, and Afghanistan’s burgeoning community of artists articulate it especially powerfully.

Type: Blog

Peace Processes

Afghanistan Donor Conference 2020: Pitfalls and Possibilities

Afghanistan Donor Conference 2020: Pitfalls and Possibilities

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

By: William Byrd

When Afghan officials and international donors meet next month to consider future aid commitments to Afghanistan, they will face a changed situation from their last gathering four years ago. Then, the focus was on tying financial assistance to government reform in the midst of ongoing war with the Taliban; peace was barely on the agenda. Now, peace talks between the Taliban and the government have begun, and a new Afghan administration is still taking shape with an agreement that resolved the disputed 2019 presidential election. Meanwhile, fighting and casualties remain at unsustainable levels and the country is reckoning with the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Economics & Environment; Democracy & Governance

Whither Islam in Afghanistan’s Political System After the Taliban Talks?

Whither Islam in Afghanistan’s Political System After the Taliban Talks?

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

By: Peter Mandaville, Ph.D.

The question of how and where Islam should fit into future legal and political frameworks has emerged as a major sticking point in the talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government in Qatar. How this question is resolved will be closely watched by Afghans, who want to ensure their hard-won rights are not sacrificed for the sake of a deal with the Taliban—Afghan women in particular have much at stake. The international community will similarly scrutinize the outcome, and their engagement with Afghanistan after the talks is expected to be conditioned on the contours of any political settlement.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Religion; Peace Processes

View All Publications