Photo Credit: The New York Times/ Bryan Denton

Both NATO and the Afghan government have taken steps recently to stem a growing number of “insider” attacks by Afghan soldiers against their Western counterparts. Thirty-two such attacks have killed 40 coalition service members this year, according to the AFP, amounting to 13 percent of all international coalition deaths in 2012. As the U.S. and other coalition nations move from an active military role to a mentoring one, these so-called “green-on-blue” attacks could pose a serious threat to the partnerships that will be crucial for building Afghan capacity ahead of the 2014 drawdown of U.S. forces.

The Washington Post’s Kevin Sieff reports today that Afghan officials have launched an effort to spy on their own army and police recruits and have implemented stronger vetting procedures for new hires, while NATO has ordered its service members to carry a loaded weapon at all times and activated a “Guardian Angel” program to ensure that one soldier in each meeting with Afghans will always be prepared to act to stop an attack.

Both Afghan and NATO officials have acknowledged that though some of the attacks have been due to insurgent infiltration, cultural differences and personal disputes have been the source of others. 

Sieff quotes Feda Wakil, the chief of staff for recruitment at the Afghan National Police, who said: “If a U.S. soldier says something against our tradition, it makes Afghan soldiers upset and could even cause an attack. We always tell NATO that the troops are not arriving with enough knowledge. They are learning from Afghans overseas who do not truly understand our culture.” In a USIP report released this summer, Nadia Gerspacher writes that these cultural differences can be addressed through better training of NATO officials in advisory roles. Gerspacher, who has helped train some Department of Defense advisers currently deployed in Afghanistan, identified three common traits for effective advisers in a recent interview

First, they advise; they don't dictate to their local counterparts. They offer ideas and knowledge; they don't insist on particular strategies. Second, they tailor their suggestions to suit cultural, institutional and political realities. They recognize — and respect — the traditions and practices of their hosts. Third, they don't shoot for the moon. Instead, they look for realistic targets and work for incremental reform.

As coalition forces increasingly move towards an advisory role ahead of 2014, training for these skills will become even more important — and potentially life-saving. General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, seems to recognize that expanding the NATO-Afghan partnership the right way could help end the insider attacks. AFP quotes Dempsey this week saying that perhaps “the actual key to this would not be to pull back and isolate ourselves but reach out and embrace them even more." 

Read Gerspacher’s full report on preparing advisers for capacity-building missions here

Steven Ruder is an editorial assistant at USIP.

Comments:

Date: Friday, August 24, 2012 11:23 AM
From: Mort Olin

I think General Dempsey is obligated to take this tack because of his position. He is between a rock and a hard place!! 

Anyone with half a brain can see that our two cultures are so different and looking for change is like looking for"leaf fall" in a rain forest. 
Forget timelines!

Let's get out now! We shouldn't have been there to begin with!! (Ask the Russians)

Related Publications

Afghanistan’s Economic and Humanitarian Crises Turn Dire

Afghanistan’s Economic and Humanitarian Crises Turn Dire

Thursday, October 14, 2021

By:William Byrd, Ph.D.

Two months after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, the country is grappling with twin economic and humanitarian crises the response to which has been complicated by international aid cutoffs, the freezing of Afghanistan’s foreign exchange reserves and sanctions on the militants. USIP’s William Byrd discusses the implications of these crises and the challenges to alleviating them.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Fragility & Resilience;Economics & Environment

Taliban Seek Recognition, But Offer Few Concessions to International Concerns

Taliban Seek Recognition, But Offer Few Concessions to International Concerns

Tuesday, September 28, 2021

By:Andrew Watkins;Ambassador Richard Olson;Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;Kate Bateman

Since taking power in August, the Taliban have repeatedly expressed the expectation that the international community will recognize their authority as the new government of Afghanistan and have taken several procedural steps to pursue recognition. But the group has done very little to demonstrate a willingness to meet the conditions put forward by Western powers and some regional states. USIP’s Andrew Watkins, Richard Olson, Asfandyar Mir and Kate Bateman assess the latest Taliban efforts to win international recognition, the position of Pakistan and other key regional players and options for U.S. policy to shape Taliban behavior and the engagement decisions of other international partners.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Global Policy;Reconciliation

China and the U.S. Exit from Afghanistan: Not a Zero-Sum Outcome

China and the U.S. Exit from Afghanistan: Not a Zero-Sum Outcome

Wednesday, September 22, 2021

By:Andrew Scobell, Ph.D.

It has become fashionable to characterize recent events in Afghanistan as a loss for the United States and a win for China. This zero-sum interpretation framed in the narrow context of U.S.-China relations is too simplistic and off the mark. The reality is far more complex and nuanced. The end of the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and the collapse of that country’s pro-Western government do not automatically translate into significant Chinese gains, nor do they trigger a swift Beijing swoop to fill the vacuum in Kabul left by Washington.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Global Policy

What Does IS-K’s Resurgence Mean for Afghanistan and Beyond?

What Does IS-K’s Resurgence Mean for Afghanistan and Beyond?

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

By:Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.

Last month’s bombing outside the Kabul airport was a devastating sign of the Islamic State of Khorasan Province’s (IS-K) recent resurgence. The group had already launched 77 attacks in the first four months of 2021 — an increase from 21 in the same period last year. This renewed capacity for mass-casualty attacks could further destabilize Afghanistan’s already precarious security situation, leaving both the new Taliban government and the United States with a vested interest in mounting an effective campaign to undercut IS-K’s presence in the region. 

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Violent Extremism

View All Publications