Each day, the daily commute to USIP's office in the Wazir Akbar Khan neighborhood of Kabul is punctuated with an unseemly five-minute passage through one of the most horrible sections of the city.

Destroyed Soviet Union tanks litter the landscape in Herat, Afghanistan,
(The New York Times/ Bryan Denton)

It is not rampant poverty or the scars from the nation's four generations of war that mar the landscape. Instead it is the opulence and saccharine palaces built by some of Afghanistan's most notorious warlords, narco-traffickers, and political elite that rise from the frozen streets like twisted gingerbread houses that taint the city. Their presence is a constant reminder of the systemic abuse of power, the inequity of the justice system and endemic corruption that has forged itself into so many areas of the nation since the Taliban's fall in 2001.

Twelve years ago, the Sher Pur area of Kabul was home to tangled blocks of single-story mud homes. These houses had been passed down over generations, often through systems of unregistered and informal titling.

In a nation that has been marked by decades of regime changes, the system of land titling and records of ownership are notoriously convoluted or missing. In 2004, some of the country's most powerful families and political operatives recognized the expanding value of urban land and they began a systemic campaign to force families from their land and take it as their own. In many instances their actions were considered legal, as all land not formally registered or titled is considered government property – convenient for the government since nearly 75% of all land in Afghanistan is without official title.

Today, Sher Pur is home to some of the most gaudy, poorly-designed homes in all of Kabul. Like most things in town, the styles have been imported from Pakistan and various Gulf states. They are designs meant to be cool during the hot summers of South Asia and the Middle East, but are not built to retain heat well in the high altitude winters of Kabul.

Form over function is their trademark. These homes offer a daily reminder of how a few powerful families and individuals have thrived since 2001, using donor aid, military interventions and perpetually weak governance to their own advantage and to the detriment of Afghanistan's poorest and most vulnerable. It is a reminder not only to those of us who commute past each day, but to all those who live in Kabul who have born witness to the inequitable growth of a few politically connected families.

Many of those families have ties to former warlords and war criminals who have been allies of NATO forces since 2001. The new bourgeoisie of Afghanistan use their influence within the government to quasi-legally grab land and further entrench their wealth. This happens not just in Sher Pur, but in other sections of the city and throughout the country.

The international community's support for these leaders and the government system they control is repeatedly cited by the Afghan public as evidence of the international community's self-interest and indifference to the Afghan people. Whether or not this is true is irrelevant because the perception is real. Partnerships and strategies that were first born of political expediency over a decade ago have led to the long-term de-legitimacy of the state and the international community's efforts in Afghanistan in the eyes of the general citizenry. The state has come to be seen as serving its own interests, protecting the benefits and windfalls that have been captured by a small elite, at the sacrifice of the genuine protection and support for the rest of the Afghan populace.

Sadly, the daily trip past the houses of Sher Pur, dripping with their external refinement and plastered in a veneer of legitimacy, belies the foundation upon which they have been built. Beside the new mansions, you can see the shattered remains of previous homes, the broken hopes of many Afghans for a government that puts the needs of the people above its own greed.

Related Publications

Afghanistan Withdrawal Should Be Based on Conditions, Not Timelines

Afghanistan Withdrawal Should Be Based on Conditions, Not Timelines

Thursday, November 19, 2020

By: Scott Worden

The Taliban’s tactic of running out the clock on the U.S. troop presence may bear fruit after the announcement on Tuesday that U.S. forces will reduce to 2,500 by January 15. The Trump administration successfully created leverage by engaging directly with the Taliban to meet their paramount goal of a U.S. withdrawal in exchange for genuine peace talks and counterterrorism guarantees. This strategy brought about unprecedented negotiations between Afghan government representatives and the Taliban in Doha. A walk down a conditions-based path to peace, long and winding as it may be, had begun.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Peace Processes

Constitutional Issues in the Afghan Peace Negotiations: Process and Substance

Constitutional Issues in the Afghan Peace Negotiations: Process and Substance

Friday, November 13, 2020

By: Barnett R. Rubin

The peace negotiations between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the Taliban that began in September in Doha, Qatar, will almost certainly include revisiting the country’s constitution. Both sides claim to abide by Islamic law, but they interpret it in very different ways. This report examines some of the constitutional issues that divide the two sides, placing them within the context of decades of turmoil in Afghanistan and suggesting ideas for how the peace process might begin to resolve them.

Type: Special Report

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Pathways for Post-Peace Development in Afghanistan

Pathways for Post-Peace Development in Afghanistan

Tuesday, November 3, 2020

By: Khyber Farahi; Scott Guggenheim

Even if the warring parties in Afghanistan manage to secure a still-elusive agreement on resolving the current conflict, significant economic challenges remain for the country, which will require continued assistance and support for core government functions. This report, based on an examination of Afghanistan’s recent development performance, provides a framework for how the Afghan government and its donor partners can more effectively deliver equitable development going forward.

Type: Special Report

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Afghan Peace Process Tests Women Activists

Afghan Peace Process Tests Women Activists

Tuesday, October 27, 2020

By: Belquis Ahmadi; Matthew Parkes

More than a month after Afghan peace talks formally began, the effort to end the war in Afghanistan is stalled, and no one faces higher stakes than Afghan women. The attempt at negotiations has snagged on preliminary issues, the Taliban have escalated their attacks, and all sides are watching the evolution of the U.S. military role in the country. Afghan women’s rights advocates say the moment, and the need for international support, is critical. U.S. officials have noted how U.S assistance can be vital in supporting women’s rights, a principle that can be advanced at a global donors’ conference next month.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Gender; Peace Processes

View All Publications