Traditional frameworks for reform and peacebuilding projects and programs in conflict-affected environments and peacebuilding are often hindered by fragmented programming, narrow analyses, and biased perspectives in favor of linear cause-and-effect thinking. By contrast, systems thinking offers an alternate process whereby practitioners can focus on the interconnectedness of disparate factors and actors, the nonlinearity of causal relationships, the relevance of feedback mechanisms, patterns, dynamic relationships, and the identification of high leverage points. This more holistic approach can be used to identifying possible intervention scenarios rather than producing specific policy advice. The value proposition of systems thinking has been demonstrated in sectors other than conflict and peacebuilding (e.g., public health).

Two security officers on motorcycles in Burkina Faso - where USIP applied a systems thinking approach to help improve citizens' trust in the judiciary (USIP photo).
Two security officers on motorcycles in Burkina Faso, where USIP applied a systems thinking approach to help improve citizens' trust in the judiciary (USIP photo).

The purpose of this course is to increase the capacity of policymakers, program managers, project managers, and implementing partners to approach reform and peacebuilding projects in conflict-environments using systems thinking and tools, i.e., by considering how the components of such projects and their interactions contribute to their outcome. Understanding such settings' dynamics toward more impactful reform requires a multi-disciplinary approach involving different groups of interconnected actors. In general, conflict-affected environments are unpredictable, uncertain, and at times chaotic. They involve numerous socioeconomic, geopolitical, and cultural factors that interact with each other, driving cycles of dynamic causes and effects. Systems thinking approaches provide ways to understand such dynamics in an integrated rather than a siloed manner, leading to improved decision making in conflict management and reform efforts with more significant impact in conflict-affected environments.

As such, this training introduces participants to different aspects of systems thinking and its application in conflict-affected environments by offering (1) a new systemic mindset for reform and peacebuilding efforts in conflict-affected settings and (2) a set of practical tools to operationalize that mindset. Drawing on a series of lectures, case studies, exercises, and virtual scenarios, this course uses an evidence-based approach to show how the principles of systems thinking and associated tools can be used to (i) map reform and peacebuilding projects; (ii) collect and analyze data in conflict-affected environments; (iii) explore and predict how conflicts may evolve; (iv) identify key places to intervene in the environments; (v) develop meaningful interventions leading to peace and stability; and (vi) monitor and evaluate progress.

Learning objectives:

  • Decide when to use systems thinking versus reductionist thinking and understanding core concepts and how they are applied. 
  • Understand key habits and communication skills of a systems thinker and application of these habits for management and reform of peacebuilding projects.  
  • Be familiar with different systems and decision-making tools to analyze the uncertainty and complexity in reform and peacebuilding efforts.  
  • Identify leverage points in reform and peacebuilding interventions and importance of tradeoffs and synergies across multiple systems involved in conflict affected environments.  
  • Practice the theory in understanding the changing dynamics of conflict affected environments, recognize the multiple interconnected and interdependent dimensions of reform and peacebuilding projects in conflict environments and how changes can affect the whole.  
  • Conduct in-depth analysis to synthesize all the systems dimensions 

If you cannot view the video, click here to watch it on YouTube.

Agenda

Chapter 1: The “Why” and “What” of Systems Thinking

We begin this course by discussing what systems are, what systems thinking is, and why systems thinking can be a powerful approach for peacebuilding work. We will discuss why systems thinking is relevant to the field of peacebuilding, and helpful when operating in volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environments.

Chapter 2: Systems Thinking Mindset

This chapter explores how a systems thinking approach differs from a linear approach. It also outlines the fifteen good habits of a systems thinker.

Chapter 3: An Introduction to Complex Systems Modeling

With this chapter, we begin to discuss the role and value of modeling in systems approaches to peacebuilding. We also highlight the differences between systems thinking as a perspective, and complex systems science as a field of expertise involving a particular method of inquiry and a range of tools.

Chapter 4: An Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling

This chapter introduces system dynamics modeling as a useful complex systems science tool.

Chapter 5: An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling

In this chapter, we introduce agent-based modeling, describing its basic components and some of its common uses.

Chapter 6: An Introduction to Network Analysis

In this chapter we introduce network analysis, describing its basic components and outlining some of its common uses.

Chapter 7: Conclusion

This chapter asks you to reflect on what you've learned throughout the course and share your feedback with us. You will also take the final exam and receive your certificate for successfully completing the course.

Course Presenters

This course was developed in 2022 by USIP in partnership with USAID's Bureau for Conflict Prevention and Stabilization, university scholars and field experts.

Related Research & Analysis

The 2022 Pelosi Visit to Taiwan: Assessing US-China Signaling and Action-Reaction Dynamics

The 2022 Pelosi Visit to Taiwan: Assessing US-China Signaling and Action-Reaction Dynamics

Monday, July 7, 2025

In recent years, the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have found it particularly challenging to interpret one another’s foreign policy signals. Misinterpretation of each other’s signaling may contribute to a bilateral action-reaction dynamic and can intensify into an action-reaction cycle and escalation spiral.

Type: Report

What the DRC-Rwanda Peace Deal Means for the U.S. and Africa’s Mineral-Rich Great Lakes Region

What the DRC-Rwanda Peace Deal Means for the U.S. and Africa’s Mineral-Rich Great Lakes Region

Thursday, July 3, 2025

Last Friday, the foreign ministers of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) met in Washington to sign an agreement to end 30 years of conflict in Africa’s Great Lakes region. The peace deal was accompanied by commitments to build a “regional economic integration framework” and promises of U.S. investment in eastern DRC’s abundant critical mineral reserves, among other commercial agreements.

Type: Question and Answer

With Cease-fire Holding, Can Israel and Iran Move Toward De-escalation?

With Cease-fire Holding, Can Israel and Iran Move Toward De-escalation?

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Israel’s stunning and sophisticated June 13 attack on Iran set off a worrying 12-day escalatory spiral. Iran responded in short order with ballistic missile and drone strikes, which led to a series of tit-for-tat exchanges between the two sides. A cease-fire is now in place -- but will it hold?

Type: Analysis

The Element of Surprise: Space and Cyber Warfare in U.S.-China Rivalry

The Element of Surprise: Space and Cyber Warfare in U.S.-China Rivalry

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

The 2024 revelations over China’s effort to implant malware in critical U.S. infrastructure by the Volt Typhoon hacking group — as well as the Salt Typhoon group’s successful breaching of at least nine major U.S. telecoms — have renewed concern over Beijing’s constant, ongoing efforts to hack Western companies, governments and non-governmental organizations. Unlike past incidents, like those involving Chinese military unit 61398, which were largely about cyber espionage, the Volt Typhoon group was actively implanting malware designed to disrupt critical infrastructure such as water and power systems.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis