Traditional frameworks for reform and peacebuilding projects and programs in conflict-affected environments and peacebuilding are often hindered by fragmented programming, narrow analyses, and biased perspectives in favor of linear cause-and-effect thinking. By contrast, systems thinking offers an alternate process whereby practitioners can focus on the interconnectedness of disparate factors and actors, the nonlinearity of causal relationships, the relevance of feedback mechanisms, patterns, dynamic relationships, and the identification of high leverage points. This more holistic approach can be used to identifying possible intervention scenarios rather than producing specific policy advice. The value proposition of systems thinking has been demonstrated in sectors other than conflict and peacebuilding (e.g., public health).

Two security officers on motorcycles in Burkina Faso - where USIP applied a systems thinking approach to help improve citizens' trust in the judiciary (USIP photo).
Two security officers on motorcycles in Burkina Faso, where USIP applied a systems thinking approach to help improve citizens' trust in the judiciary (USIP photo).

The purpose of this course is to increase the capacity of policymakers, program managers, project managers, and implementing partners to approach reform and peacebuilding projects in conflict-environments using systems thinking and tools, i.e., by considering how the components of such projects and their interactions contribute to their outcome. Understanding such settings' dynamics toward more impactful reform requires a multi-disciplinary approach involving different groups of interconnected actors. In general, conflict-affected environments are unpredictable, uncertain, and at times chaotic. They involve numerous socioeconomic, geopolitical, and cultural factors that interact with each other, driving cycles of dynamic causes and effects. Systems thinking approaches provide ways to understand such dynamics in an integrated rather than a siloed manner, leading to improved decision making in conflict management and reform efforts with more significant impact in conflict-affected environments.

As such, this training introduces participants to different aspects of systems thinking and its application in conflict-affected environments by offering (1) a new systemic mindset for reform and peacebuilding efforts in conflict-affected settings and (2) a set of practical tools to operationalize that mindset. Drawing on a series of lectures, case studies, exercises, and virtual scenarios, this course uses an evidence-based approach to show how the principles of systems thinking and associated tools can be used to (i) map reform and peacebuilding projects; (ii) collect and analyze data in conflict-affected environments; (iii) explore and predict how conflicts may evolve; (iv) identify key places to intervene in the environments; (v) develop meaningful interventions leading to peace and stability; and (vi) monitor and evaluate progress.

Learning objectives:

  • Decide when to use systems thinking versus reductionist thinking and understanding core concepts and how they are applied. 
  • Understand key habits and communication skills of a systems thinker and application of these habits for management and reform of peacebuilding projects.  
  • Be familiar with different systems and decision-making tools to analyze the uncertainty and complexity in reform and peacebuilding efforts.  
  • Identify leverage points in reform and peacebuilding interventions and importance of tradeoffs and synergies across multiple systems involved in conflict affected environments.  
  • Practice the theory in understanding the changing dynamics of conflict affected environments, recognize the multiple interconnected and interdependent dimensions of reform and peacebuilding projects in conflict environments and how changes can affect the whole.  
  • Conduct in-depth analysis to synthesize all the systems dimensions 

If you cannot view the video, click here to watch it on YouTube.

Agenda

Chapter 1: The “Why” and “What” of Systems Thinking

We begin this course by discussing what systems are, what systems thinking is, and why systems thinking can be a powerful approach for peacebuilding work. We will discuss why systems thinking is relevant to the field of peacebuilding, and helpful when operating in volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environments.

Chapter 2: Systems Thinking Mindset

This chapter explores how a systems thinking approach differs from a linear approach. It also outlines the fifteen good habits of a systems thinker.

Chapter 3: An Introduction to Complex Systems Modeling

With this chapter, we begin to discuss the role and value of modeling in systems approaches to peacebuilding. We also highlight the differences between systems thinking as a perspective, and complex systems science as a field of expertise involving a particular method of inquiry and a range of tools.

Chapter 4: An Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling

This chapter introduces system dynamics modeling as a useful complex systems science tool.

Chapter 5: An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling

In this chapter, we introduce agent-based modeling, describing its basic components and some of its common uses.

Chapter 6: An Introduction to Network Analysis

In this chapter we introduce network analysis, describing its basic components and outlining some of its common uses.

Chapter 7: Conclusion

This chapter asks you to reflect on what you've learned throughout the course and share your feedback with us. You will also take the final exam and receive your certificate for successfully completing the course.

Course Presenters

This course was developed in 2022 by USIP in partnership with USAID's Bureau for Conflict Prevention and Stabilization, university scholars and field experts.

Related Research & Analysis

What Do Changes in China’s Nuclear Program Mean for India?

What Do Changes in China’s Nuclear Program Mean for India?

Thursday, March 13, 2025

At the end of 2024, the annual U.S. Department of Defense report on military and security developments in China reinforced evolving assessments of China’s rapid nuclear expansion with an alarming projection: The U.S. expects China to have 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030 despite having maintained a nuclear arsenal of approximately 300 warheads for decades.

Type: Analysis

Taiwan Stronger: Ramping Up Defense Resilience to Counter China

Taiwan Stronger: Ramping Up Defense Resilience to Counter China

Monday, March 10, 2025

The direct threat that China poses to Taiwan continues to rise and is far more severe and serious today than ever before. In addition to the increasing daily tempo of gray-zone coercion and armed provocations all around Taiwan, the specter of an outright attack or naval blockade by China looms larger than at any other time in the post-Cold War era.

Type: Analysis

Sectarian Violence Threatens Syria’s Shaky Transition

Sectarian Violence Threatens Syria’s Shaky Transition

Monday, March 10, 2025

Syria is witnessing the most significant sectarian violence since the fall of the Assad regime on December 8, 2024. Unverified estimates put the death toll over 1,000, with civilians comprising the vast majority of those killed. Clashes have largely been centered in Alawite strongholds along Syria’s Mediterranean coast, from the city of Tartus north to Latakia. The violence prompted large-scale protests in Damascus and other cities, while many anxious Alawite families have fled their homes along the coast. Syria’s interim president, Ahmed al-Shara, has called for “civil peace” and announced the launching of an independent committee to investigate the killings.

Type: Question and Answer

Xi Jinping’s Calculus of Cross-Strait Conflict

Xi Jinping’s Calculus of Cross-Strait Conflict

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

The strategic costs to China incurred by a comprehensive military campaign to compel unification with Taiwan likely are myriad and exorbitant. However, Taiwan’s prominent position in the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) core-interest hierarchy complicates assessments of the extent to which any cost drive the party’s decisions regarding use of force for unification. Beijing’s calculation of costs of action versus perceived cost of restraint is a foremost consideration in any Chinese use-of-force equation, and therefore critical in weighing U.S. options for deterring Chinese military action against Taiwan.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis