Three U.S. troops were killed and at least 34 injured in a drone strike on a U.S. base in northeast Jordan on January 28.  The attack comes against a backdrop of rising regional tensions since the outbreak of conflict in Gaza following the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel.

A Navy MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter patrolled the Strait of Hormuz on Dec. 14, 2023. (Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Keith Nowak)
A Navy MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter patrolled the Strait of Hormuz on Dec. 14, 2023. (Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Keith Nowak)

USIP’s Mona Yacoubian and Sarhang Hamasaeed examine the significance of the drone strike, a likely U.S. response and the Iran-backed proxies that are behind such attacks.

What is the significance of the January 28 drone strike?

Yacoubian: The January 28 attack — claimed by the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, a loose coalition of Iranian-backed militias — is notable in several respects. While there have been more than 150 attacks on U.S. targets in Iraq and Syria since October, this is the first strike that has killed U.S. servicemembers. The U.S. deaths cross an important escalation threshold, with President Biden vowing to respond.

The strikes hit Tower 22, a small U.S. military installation in northeast Jordan, expanding the arena of confrontation between the United States and Iranian-backed militias to Jordan for the first time. Not only does the targeting in Jordan mark a widening of conflict in the region, but it also constitutes a dangerous development for the Hashemite Kingdom which is already pressured by the conflict in Gaza.

The timing of the strike is also notable, as it occurred on the heels of Tehran’s first direct engagement in the region’s growing turmoil taking place earlier this month with its strikes on Syria, northern Iraq, and Pakistan in what appears to be an escalation by Iran. The Tower 22 attack also comes against a backdrop of reports that the United States is weighing the option of withdrawing its forces from Syria, despite U.S. government denials. The United States is also under growing pressure to pull its troops from Iraq following the January 4 U.S. drone strike on an Iranian-backed militia leader in Baghdad. Finally, the strike in Jordan took place at a delicate moment in the negotiations to free the remaining Israeli and American hostages held by Hamas in Gaza.

How will the United States respond to the attack?

Yacoubian: Given the U.S. casualties that occurred, this latest attack on U.S. forces demands a more forceful U.S. response. However, U.S. planners are likely seeking to develop a response that reestablishes deterrence without tipping the region into a wider conflict. This balancing act underscores the challenge of how to deter non-state actors acting on behalf of a state sponsor and using asymmetric means to strike U.S. targets.  

Iran has denied involvement in the attack, following a pattern of Iran hiding behind various proxy groups and the shadowy circumstances under which such strikes have been undertaken. Both the United States and Iran assert they are not interested in a wider war and yet the escalating pace and breadth of attacks underscores the need for the United States to assert itself and deter Iran or its proxies from further escalation.

Some are calling for direct U.S. strikes on Iran, but Biden administration officials are likely reluctant for fear of widening the conflict. The drone strike was reportedly launched from Syria, so the United States may opt to respond in Syria, targeting Iranian personnel, such as the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

What is the Islamic Resistance in Iraq? What is its connection to Iran?

Hamasaeed: Today, the Islamic Resistance in Iraq commonly refers to Iran-backed armed groups — also called militias — that conduct drone and missile attacks against U.S. interests in Iraq, including Iraqi bases that host military personnel from the United States and the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

The attacks by these groups had paused after the formation of the Iraqi government under the premiership of Mohammed Shia al-Sudani in late 2022. However, the attacks resumed last October under the pretext of solidarity with the Palestinians and in response to the United States backing Israel.

In the immediate years following the 2003 U.S.-led intervention in Iraq, Sunni groups fought against U.S. and coalition troops under the banner of Islamic resistance. These groups evolved into the Islamic State of Iraq in 2006 and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (or al-Sham) in 2013. However, the concept of Islamic resistance in Iraq and the Middle East region is more associated with the different predominantly Shia groups that Iran supports in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen. Who would qualify as part of the Islamic Resistance in Iraq varies depending on who you ask and when. Groups like Harakat al-Nujaba operate more publicly, while others like Ashab al-Kahf are more in the shadows and may change their name after a while.

Applying a wider definition, many Iraqis and Iraq experts consider members of the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces, which has been legalized as an entity reporting to Iraq’s commander in chief, as also part of Iran’s sphere of resistance. The actors in this Iranian sphere have advanced arms, economic and media capabilities that they leverage widely.

How does this latest attack fit into the broader escalation of the conflict across the region?

Hamasaeed: The Sunday attack in the Syria-Jordan border region on U.S. troops that led to the death of three U.S. service members and injured 34 others is a dangerous escalation, crosses a U.S. red line and increases the risk of a regional war.

Hostilities have expanded significantly since Hamas attacked Israel on October 7. In addition to Gaza and Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and the Red Sea have become domains of violent action. A broad set of Iran-backed actors — such as Lebanese Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen and Harakat al-Nujaba in Iraq — conducted attacks in different parts of the region. Iran itself struck targets in Iraq, Pakistan and Syria. In addition to deploying its own military assets and striking military targets in Iraq and Syria, the United States worked with allies and formed Operation Prosperity Guardian to ensure freedom of navigation in the Red Sea and has been striking Houthi targets inside Yemen in response to their armed attacks. The United States also redesignated the Houthis as a terrorist organization. Weapon types, frequency of attacks and casualties have also been on the rise.

Although it is denying it, Iran is accused of being the mastermind and enabler of these attacks and their escalation. Neither Iran nor its allies seem to be deterred by threats, diplomatic attempts, military strikes such as in Iraq and Yemen or the terrorist designation of the Houthis. This is all cause for real concern.


Related Research & Analysis

What Does ‘Maximum Pressure’ on Iran Mean for Iraq?

What Does ‘Maximum Pressure’ on Iran Mean for Iraq?

Thursday, March 13, 2025

On March 8, the United States allowed a waiver to expire that had permitted Iraq to buy Iranian electricity. The move was the latest in the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign to cut off Iran’s revenue streams and push Tehran to negotiate over its controversial nuclear program. The waiver dates back to President Trump’s first term. In 2018, Trump withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which had granted Iran sanctions relief in return for curbing its nuclear program and expanding cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog.

Type: Question and Answer

The Current Situation in Iran

The Current Situation in Iran

Monday, February 10, 2025

For decades, Iran has vexed the international community. It introduced Islam as a form of governance in 1979 and has supported militants abroad and defied international norms. The Islamic Republic has long opposed Israel and sought to expel U.S. forces from the Middle East. It has also deepened ties with other U.S. adversaries, including China, Russia and North Korea.

Type: Fact Sheet

U.S. National Security Advisors Talk Top Foreign Policy Challenges

U.S. National Security Advisors Talk Top Foreign Policy Challenges

Thursday, January 16, 2025

Against the backdrop of numerous crises and challenges — including destructive wildfires in California, the fall of Bashar al-Assad in Syria and cease-fire negotiations in Gaza — National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and his successor, Michael Waltz, believe a seamless transition from the Biden to Trump administrations is essential for safeguarding U.S. security. President-elect Donald J. Trump is set to take the oath of office in Washington on January 20.

Type: Analysis

Iran and Russia Are the Biggest Regional Losers of Assad’s Fall

Iran and Russia Are the Biggest Regional Losers of Assad’s Fall

Thursday, December 12, 2024

Among the central factors that led to the ouster of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad was Iran’s and Russia’s decisions to not intervene yet again to prop him up. Tehran had long used Syria as vector to project influence in the region and marshalled significant resources and manpower to keep Assad in power when the Syrian civil war erupted in 2011. Moscow similarly saw its ties with Assad as a source of regional influence, and its 2015 intervention in Syria was decisive in Assad maintaining his stranglehold on power.

Type: Question and Answer

View All Research & Analysis