In over 20 years since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the threat from extremist violence and terrorism has evolved considerably. Terrorist attacks worldwide have increased in number, diffused geographically and diversified ideologically. These developments in the terrorist landscape have been fueled by violent conflict and state fragility, and they present opportunities for strategic rivals to challenge the value of democratic governance and the rules-based international system.

USIP’s Work

USIP recognizes extremist violence as an expression of violent conflict and engagement in it as a form of violent behavior. Our work is calibrated to drive toward a world without fear of extremist violence by amplifying the factors that promote community resilience to extremist violence and protect against engagement in it: belonging, agency, meaning and well-being.

As a global focal point for transforming conventional responses to terrorism, USIP equips policymakers, practitioners and other stakeholders with tools and insights to effectively respond to the instrumentalization of violence by nonstate actors. USIP curates knowledge, builds collaborative partnerships, strengthens capacities and convenes and advises key stakeholders on peacebuilding approaches that work across individual, social and structural levels to reduce discrimination and marginalization, bridge social divides, and promote accountable governance.

This work supports the U.S. National Strategy for Counterterrorism and the Global Fragility Act by marshalling our distinctive institutional capabilities to prevent mobilization into extremist violence, facilitate disengagement from it, and shrink the pool of people vulnerable to exploitation by violent extremist forces.

Robust Research

RESOLVE Network. USIP manages the Researching Solutions to Violent Extremism (RESOLVE) Network. RESOLVE is a global consortium of researchers, organizations, policymakers and practitioners committed to improving practice and policy with better and locally informed research.

Learning from local peacebuilding approaches. Through case studies in sub-Saharan Africa, USIP and the RESOLVE Network provide insights into mechanisms for addressing community-based armed groups and extremist violence as they relate to local conflict dynamics. The project will culminate in a local peacebuilding framework for preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE).

Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremism (REMVE). This research examines how movements based on racial or ethnic superiority may feed off perceived grievances and global events, undermine democratic governance and values, and metastasize transnationally. REMVE research focuses on improving understanding of the dynamics, trends, tactics, online information ecosystems and transnational connections among REMVE movements and groups.

Practitioner Support and Community-Centered Programming

Addressing the human legacies of ISIS. In Iraq, Tunisia and Central Asia, the Institute works with local leaders, civil society and national governments to help countries and communities prepare for the return of people who traveled to live or fight with ISIS, build mechanisms to end cycles of revenge, and address communal grievances that perpetuate divisions and conflict.

Elevating women’s roles. The Women Preventing Violent Extremism (WPVE) program supports women leaders in addressing national policies and community approaches to P/CVE in the Greater Horn of Africa and Sahel. WPVE fosters collaboration and dialogue between communities and national decisionmakers and supports regional platforms for women across Africa.

Religious and psychosocial support for trauma survivors. USIP trains local religious actors and mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) professionals in regions like Latin America and Southeast Asia to address cycles of violence.

Thought Leadership and Informing Policy

Reviewing the P/CVE Toolbox. USIP is undertaking an effort to understand how different types of conflict and violence intersect. USIP will explore the complex dynamics faced in contemporary conflict environments and what array of tools and partnerships across disparate areas of practice can create efficiencies, reduce duplication of effort, and amplify impact.

Global Counterterrorism Forum. USIP organizes regional workshops connecting experts and practitioners with policymakers to share experiences, develop strategies and draft good practices to manage the return of people who traveled to live or fight with ISIS.

Peacebuilding approaches to P/CVE in the southern Philippines. USIP collaborates closely with local partners to support the development of evidence-based approaches to P/CVE that complement the implementation of the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro.

Related Publications

For Sahel Stability, U.S. Needs Broader, Coordinated Policy

For Sahel Stability, U.S. Needs Broader, Coordinated Policy

Thursday, March 21, 2024

By: Kris Inman;  Matthew Reitman

As military coups and violent insurgencies have spread across Africa’s Sahel over the past decade, U.S. policy has professed to recognize and address their interconnections across the region, notably through the Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership. Yet this effort remains insufficient to meet the scale and complexity of the violence and the underlying failures of governance.

Type: Analysis

Violent Extremism

The United States Weighs Its Options in the Face of Iran’s Provocations

The United States Weighs Its Options in the Face of Iran’s Provocations

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed;  Mona Yacoubian

Three U.S. troops were killed and at least 34 injured in a drone strike on a U.S. base in northeast Jordan on January 28. The attack comes against a backdrop of rising regional tensions since the outbreak of conflict in Gaza following the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel.

Type: AnalysisQuestion and Answer

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal PolicyViolent Extremism

Making Sense of Iran-Pakistan Cross-Border Strikes

Making Sense of Iran-Pakistan Cross-Border Strikes

Friday, January 19, 2024

By: Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.

In a surprising turn on January 16, Iran launched missile strikes into Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, claiming it had hit two strongholds of anti-Iran insurgent group Jaish al-Adl (Army of Justice). Iran announced the attack in Pakistan concurrent to its strikes in Iraq and Syria. Less than two days later, Pakistan hit back with not only missiles but also fighter jets in Iran’s Sistan-Baluchistan province — claiming to target hideouts of anti-Pakistan ethno-nationalist insurgents operating from Iranian soil.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal PolicyViolent Extremism

Senior Study Group for the Sahel: Final Report and Recommendations

Senior Study Group for the Sahel: Final Report and Recommendations

Thursday, January 18, 2024

By: Bipartisan Senior Study Group for the Sahel

The United States has not traditionally viewed the Sahel as a region of vital interest, whether in terms of security or from an economic or business perspective. This has led to a pattern of reactive involvement shaped by the circumstances of specific events rather than proactive commitments. This pattern reveals the lack of a comprehensive strategy for the volatile Western Sahel region, which includes Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, and Niger. In April 2022, President Joe Biden announced that the US government would advance the “U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability” in coastal West Africa by prioritizing a partnership with Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, and Togo.

Type: Report

Civilian-Military RelationsDemocracy & GovernancePeace ProcessesViolent Extremism

View All Publications


Related Projects

View All