Pakistan held indirect elections on March 3 for the Senate, its upper house of Parliament, which is elected by sitting legislators in the National Assembly (the lower house of Parliament) and each of the provincial assemblies. Given the typically party-line vote, Pakistani Senate elections tend to be mundane affairs, with the results often preordained. However, in last week’s elections the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, despite having a numerical majority in the national and provincial assemblies, failed to forestall defections among some lawmakers and in doing so failed to take control of the Senate from the opposition.

Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan at his residence in Islamabad, April 9, 2019. (Saiyna Bashir/The New York Times)
Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan at his residence in Islamabad, April 9, 2019. (Saiyna Bashir/The New York Times)

This surprise outcome emboldened the opposition parties to seek a no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Imran Khan. Before they could seek to unseat his government, Khan pre-emptively pushed for a confidence vote and won it handily. USIP’s Pakistan experts look at the latest developments in Pakistan’s turbulent domestic politics.

The ruling party’s narrow loss of a heavily contested Islamabad Senate seat, suggests that the PTI government may lack a reliable or unified majority in the National Assembly. Despite easily winning a confidence motion, what does this Senate upset reveal about the strength of the ruling coalition?

Salikuddin: The surprising and historic inability of the PTI-led coalition government to secure a majority (and losing an important Islamabad seat to boot) in the Senate is the largest political setback in its two- and half-year tenure. Khan’s vote of confidence (a vote that is an open ballot as opposed to the secret one for the Senate) shows that he has the numbers to maintain his government, but the whole incident has emboldened the opposition to continue to seek ways to weaken it. The willingness of PTI parliamentarians and allies to defect opens the doors for continued horse trading and party-switching, which will intensify if the political calculus becomes that the government will not survive its five-year tenure. The next test may come in seeking a no-confidence vote in the Provincial Assembly of Punjab, where the PTI government is particularly unpopular and in a precarious coalition. A government that is already being criticized for its inability to deliver will be further distracted in trying to maintain its governing coalition both at the center and in the provinces.

In the weeks and months leading up to the Senate elections, the PTI government sought to introduce electoral reforms that would have mandated an open ballot vote, with Khan and others accusing the opposition of bribing lawmakers to switch their votes. What explains the apparent instances of defections here?

Siddiqui and Rafiq: Dissatisfaction among and emerging factions within the PTI parliamentarians were apparent in the results of the Senate elections, and the secret ballot format provided party members in the National Assembly cover to defect, whether it was a vote of conscience or due to an element of corruption. Members of Parliament across the board, but PTI in particular, are facing growing public pressure due to rising inflation and unemployment, with the COVID pandemic and an expected third wave exacerbating the situation. Several parliamentarians are likely looking ahead to 2023 for alternative political vehicles to bolster their re-election chances.

The process for Senate elections is delineated in Pakistan’s constitution. So, the earlier efforts by the PTI government to gain greater oversight over its members’ votes by changing the election procedure from a secret to an open ballot through ordinances and court petitions was an uphill battle, coming as it did so close to the election. In his nationally televised address after the elections, Khan gave a scathing rebuke of Election Commission of Pakistan (the ECP, which manages Pakistan’s elections), arguing that by not allowing for a process to identify who cast which ballot, the ECP saved criminals and “provided an opportunity for the country's democracy to be discredited.” The ECP countered with a surprisingly strong statement noting that the Senate elections were conducted within the confines of the law and that “the mudslinging should stop.” This sets up a potential future conflict between the government and the election administrators over future electoral reform measures that the PTI government may seek to push through before the next general elections are held.

Opposition parties have been mobilizing in street protests for the past several months against the PTI government and had earlier announced plans for a large march on the capital later this month. Is the opposition win in the Senate elections likely to lead to a shift away from street confrontations to working through the elected Parliament instead?

Cookman: The opposition parties held together in the Senate elections, boycotted the government’s confidence vote, and are now focused on upcoming votes to fill leadership positions in the Senate. While they are united in their opposition to the current PTI government, the different parties that comprise the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) umbrella opposition coalition each have different bases of political support, and there has been a continual push and pull within the movement over how to achieve their goal of ousting Khan. Parts of the PDM are gearing up for a march on Islamabad, but successes in the Senate will likely strengthen the position of those parties who would prefer to try and split the PTI’s governing coalition in the Punjab provincial government through negotiation rather than confrontation, at least in the near term. The question now is whether the government or opposition coalition will prove the more vulnerable to fracture going forward.

What other impacts will the Senate elections have on Pakistan’s domestic political situation?

Olson: The most prominent casualty of the Senate elections was Dr. Abdul Hafeez Sheikh, who was defeated by Pakistan Peoples Party stalwart Yousaf Raza Gilani. Sheikh had been serving as an advisor for finance (i.e., de facto minister). The Pakistani courts have taken a dim view of non-elected officials serving in ministerial capacity and running him for the Senate was an attempt to regularize his status. Sheikh is a well-respected technocrat who is well known in international financial circles and has good ties with the military establishment. Khan has signaled support for Sheikh, who under existing special legislation, can continue as finance minister until June. That could give PTI time to jury rig a political solution (e.g., inducing an existing PTI senator to resign and running Sheikh to fill the vacancy), but the broader question is how Khan will manage the populist tendency within his party that this episode revealed. Sheikh was clearly not in the same political weight class as Gilani, but he also may have been weakened by his association with the International Monetary Fund-imposed austerity program when much of the PTI rank and file believe in an Islamic welfare state. As the PTI government pursues a policy of “economic security” this tension will have to be resolved or bridged.

What implications do these elections have for Pakistan’s civil-military balance and Pakistan’s security or foreign policy priorities?

Salikuddin: The military establishment, which the opposition has accused of meddling in politics, remained largely on the sidelines for the Senate elections. This perceived neutrality will help the establishment avoid being the subject of the upcoming opposition march. Additionally, the government’s inability to control its own parliamentarians reinforced that while establishment support is important for a government’s longevity, the ruling party cannot abandon day-to-day political management to the establishment.

The U.S.-Pakistan bilateral relationship can be expected to remain unaffected in the short term because of political instability in the country. While the civilian government will remain pre-occupied with domestic political infighting, the military continues to engage closely with the United States on the Afghan peace process and will be focused on upcoming U.S. troop withdrawal decisions.

Related Publications

Extending Constitutional Rights to Pakistan’s Tribal Areas

Extending Constitutional Rights to Pakistan’s Tribal Areas

Tuesday, April 6, 2021

By: Umar Mahmood Khan; Rana Hamza Ijaz; Sevim Saadat

When Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas were officially merged into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province in May 2018, the five million residents of the former tribal areas acquired the same constitutional rights and protections—including access to a formal judicial system—as Pakistan’s other citizens. This report, based on field research carried out by the authors, explores the status of the formal justice system’s expansion, finding both positive trends and severe administrative and capacity challenges, and offers recommendations to address these issues.

Type: Special Report

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

India, Pakistan choke on their smog. Can they clear the air?

India, Pakistan choke on their smog. Can they clear the air?

Monday, March 29, 2021

By: Jumaina Siddiqui; Zaara Wakeel

South Asia’s extreme smog worsens each winter, helping to kill an estimated 1.2 million Indians and 128,000 Pakistanis annually—more than have died in either country from the COVID virus. As pollution this past winter exacerbated the pandemic, India’s and Pakistan’s governments responded with mutual blame. Yet COVID, and a sudden moment of détente between these bitter rivals, could offer an opportunity to address the smog crisis, and build rare collaboration with the only strategy that can work: a joint one. The governments, their U.S. and international allies and civil society should use this chance to jumpstart such an effort.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Economics & Environment

Pakistan: A Rising Women’s Movement Confronts a New Backlash

Pakistan: A Rising Women’s Movement Confronts a New Backlash

Wednesday, March 17, 2021

By: Aleena Khan

Thousands of women rallied across Pakistan on International Women’s Day this year and demanded an end to violence against women and gender minorities. In the days since, Pakistan’s Taliban movement has escalated the threats facing the women who marched. Opponents of women’s rights doctored a video of the rally to suggest that the women had committed blasphemy—an accusation that has been frequently weaponized against minorities in Pakistan and has resulted in vigilantes killing those who are targeted.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Gender

Biden and Washington’s Perennial Pakistan Problem

Biden and Washington’s Perennial Pakistan Problem

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

By: Ambassador Richard Olson

Among the many challenges facing the Biden administration will be addressing the infamously dysfunctional U.S.-Pakistan relationship. Anyone familiar with how Islamabad and Washington have interacted over the last 74 years will resort to tired metaphors: a roller-coaster ride, a sine wave, the dynamic between an overbearing mother-in-law and her daughter-in-law. These clichés reflect the reality that the relationship has rarely been stable and usually is either declining precipitously or accelerating unsustainably. The challenge for the new administration will be to find a way to work productively with Pakistan without oscillating between peaks of enthusiasm and depths of cynicism.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Global Policy

View All Publications