Heading into 2021, the violent extremist landscape is more diverse than at any previous point in the last two decades since the start of the U.S.-led Global War on Terrorism. While that effort was almost exclusively focused on combating violent extremist organizations motivated by Salafi-jihadism, there has been a universal recognition that other forms of extremism have proliferated. Many governments and states feel completely unprepared and underequipped to deal with these new forms of extremism, which include, but are not limited to, racially and ethnically motivated terrorism, terrorism inspired by extreme misogyny, left-wing terrorism, and the rapid spread of conspiracy theories.

Police patrol the scene of a mass shooting in central Vienna on Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2020. The attacker, who was killed by police, was a 20-year-old Austrian citizen who had once been imprisoned for attempting to travel to Syria to join the Islamic State. (Laetitia Vancon/The New York Times)
Police patrol the scene of a mass shooting in Vienna on Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2020. The attacker was a 20-year-old Austrian citizen who had once been imprisoned for attempting to travel to Syria to join the Islamic State. (Laetitia Vancon/The New York Times)

At the 2020 RESOLVE Network Global Forum, we focused on looking beyond the horizon to identify new forms of violent extremism and how those will manifest in the future. Several themes in particular are worth highlighting when considering the complex nature of the violent extremism landscape: the continued threat posed by remnants of the Islamic State, the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on violent extremism and terrorist groups, and concepts like cultural loss and other so-called grievance narratives that violent extremist organizations leverage for recruitment and propaganda.

Whither ISIS?

In late 2020, with the physical caliphate in ruins, ISIS continues to rebuild its network throughout Iraq and Syria, maintaining a steady operational tempo of attacks, and flush with enough cash to indefinitely wage a low-level campaign of sabotage, ambush, and terrorism for the foreseeable future. But even as the world might prepare to move on, it’s not that simple.

Thousands of fighters remain in prisons and detention camps, while tens of thousands of those who had previously lived among ISIS in camps like al-Hol are vulnerable to further extremism and radicalization with few countries eager to repatriate their citizens. It has never been more important for states to embrace the prospect of reintegration for promoting disengagement, while also recognizing the very real limits to reintegration and rehabilitation in the current political context, especially in the West. Yet despite the political challenges, the failure to reintegrate citizens will only fuel future radicalization and make it easier for terrorist and insurgent groups to recruit. By making citizens stateless, countries are effectively condemning them to become citizens of the Islamic State.

The Pandemic’s Impact

The COVID-19 pandemic has dominated the headlines in 2020 and impacted everyone’s way of life. Beyond the obvious, the second and third order effects of the pandemic might not always be apparent but can be insidious and corrosive in the short and long term. In Germany, far-right extremists have used the COVID-related lockdown measures to accelerate recruitment trends of neo-Nazis and white supremacists. COVID-19 has revealed an increasing lack of trust in expert systems, as well as a pervasive and growing sense of anomie. During COVID-19, there has been a drastic increase in both domestic violence and online child sex abuse, further contributing to a growing sense of lawlessness.

Terrorist groups have used the pandemic as a way to advance their own narratives. The coronavirus has served as a veritable buffet for actors across the ideological spectrum to push their extremists worldviews. Entering 2021, it remains likely that counterterrorism budgets will suffer, as funds are reallocated to deal with austerity measures and much-needed assistance to public health programs. Austerity and anxiety are a toxic combination, and could serve to fuel recruitment, especially for racially and ethnically motivated terrorists that seek to play off fears by advancing xenophobic and racist ideas related to the spread of COVID-19.

Grievance Narratives

Lastly, the concept of cultural loss is being manipulated by ideologues and extremists who seek to divide society along racial and ethnic lines. The concept of white genocide and the need to protect Western civilization and values while promoting a white ethno-state has fueled the global expansion of far-right extremists, including neo-Nazis and violent white supremacists. This concept has been pushed by terrorists such as Anders Breivik in Norway and Brenton Tarrant in New Zealand. The concept of cultural loss has been operationalized by violent extremists across North America, Europe, Ukraine, and Australia.

The manipulation of this concept is not limited to violent white supremacists and neo-Nazis. Throughout parts of Asia, including in India, Burma, Sri Lanka, and China, there is the challenge of dealing with the “majority with a minority complex.” The result has been anti-Muslim violence and campaign to harass, intimidate, and repress Muslims in these countries. Violent rhetoric enabled by social media has fueled acts of terrorism and extremism, at times enabled by governments and politicians. 

The common thread running through all of these issues is the challenge posed by violent extremism, which is constantly changing and assuming new forms. Accordingly, it is more important than ever that policymaking related to countering violent extremism be driven by informed decision-making based on empirical evidence and sound data collection and analysis.

Colin P. Clarke is a member of the RESOLVE Network Research Advisory Council and a senior research fellow at The Soufan Center in New York City.

Related Publications

Central Asia’s New Foreign Fighters Problem: The Russia-Ukraine War

Central Asia’s New Foreign Fighters Problem: The Russia-Ukraine War

Thursday, September 8, 2022

By: William B. Farrell, Ph.D.

Since the start of the current conflict in Ukraine, there have been growing glimpses coming through media reports, social media feeds and personal networks of Central Asian mercenaries and volunteers fighting on both sides of the Russia-Ukraine war. But the emergence of this new foreign fighter phenomenon — less than a decade after thousands of Central Asians joined ISIS in Iraq and Syria — is raising increasing concerns and important questions for Central Asian security. Unlike the phenomenon of Central Asians fighting in Iraq and Syria, the cleavages in Ukraine are much closer to home and echo those in Central Asian society, which makes this mobilization much more divisive internally.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Violent Extremism

The Latest on al-Qaida after al-Zawahiri: 3 Things You Need to Know

The Latest on al-Qaida after al-Zawahiri: 3 Things You Need to Know

Tuesday, August 9, 2022

By: Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.

It's been about 10 years since the killing of al-Qaida leader Osama Bin Laden. In July, his successor Ayman al-Zawahiri was killed in a drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan. In this episode of The Latest, Asfandyar Mir, a senior expert in USIP's Asia Center, describes where this leaves al-Qaida, what it means for U.S. counterterrorism policy, and who the next leader of al-Qaida might be.

Type: Blog

Violent Extremism

After al-Zawahiri’s Killing, What’s Next for the U.S. in Afghanistan?

After al-Zawahiri’s Killing, What’s Next for the U.S. in Afghanistan?

Tuesday, August 2, 2022

By: Kate Bateman;  Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;  Andrew Watkins

On Monday, President Biden revealed that a U.S. drone strike killed al-Qaida leader, and mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Ayman al-Zawahiri over the weekend. Al-Zawahiri was reportedly on the balcony of a safe house in Kabul, Afghanistan. Last week, the United States participated in a regional conference in Tashkent, Uzbekistan focused on counterterrorism, where Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi said his regime had followed through on commitments to not allow Afghanistan to be used as a base for transnational terrorism.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Violent Extremism

ISIS is a Problem of Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

ISIS is a Problem of Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

Thursday, July 28, 2022

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed

More than three years after its military defeat in Iraq and Syria, ISIS is a downgraded threat thanks to the collective efforts of the U.S.-led global coalition that coalesced to defeat it along with Iraqi and Syrian partners. While the extremist group’s capacity has been drastically reduced and millions of people have returned home, ISIS has managed to continue attacks year after year despite no longer holding territory. Meanwhile, some of the most difficult human legacies — the challenges facing the people the ISIS conflict left behind — are still with us, with no end in sight.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Violent Extremism

View All Publications