U.S. Senator Joni Ernst said that despite Americans’ weariness with U.S. involvement in Iraq, concerns about terrorism and regional stability make a continuing military commitment in the country a necessity.

“Our first and our highest priority must be to ensure that the Iraqi government has the equipment and the training to conduct sustained and resilient counterterrorism operations,” Ernst said at the U.S. Institute of Peace. “Unless we are confident in Iraq’s capacity and ability to defend themselves, U.S. presence in Iraq will remain necessary to protect our interests.”

Senator Joni Ernst discusses U.S. policy options in Iraq at the U.S. Institute of Peace on July 26, 2018.

An On-the-Ground Perspective

Ernst, who got an on-the-ground view of Iraq as commander of a transport company operating out of Kuwait in 2003, said the experience left her with a keen desire to promote peace and prosperity in a region devastated by war over the past 15 years. Ernst, an Iowa Republican, said that from her position as a senator and chair of the Armed Services Committee’s subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, she is working to be a part of the solution for Iraq. 

Beyond counterterrorism, America’s interests in Iraq include blunting the influence of the country’s neighbor, Iran, and Russia, which she said is seeking inroads. Ernst said she rejected the premise that the U.S. and Iran shared any strategic interest simply because both wanted to defeat ISIS. Iran’s strategic goals will be impeded by a strong, prosperous, Western-allied Iraq, which will depend to a large degree, she said, on the U.S. staying the course in its mission to train, advise and assist Iraqi forces. 

If the U.S. turns its back on the country, cutting the security assistance that has significantly improved its military capability, terrorism could re-emerge and the government will look elsewhere—and very likely to Russia, she said. 

Supporting Iraq’s Development

Ernst said the U.S. must now find ways to support Iraq’s development as a free and democratic society. Specifically, she said the U.S. must work with international partners to support ethnic and religious minorities, who she said had suffered the most from ISIS and other violence in the country. Rather than providing blanket funding for stability operations, the U.S. should make a priority of those communities through USAID rather than wait for the United Nations and other international organizations, she said. 

“To accomplish this, the U.S. must work with groups and partners, such as the U.S. Institute of Peace, who have the relationships and access necessary to reach these communities in areas still plagued by violence,” Ernst said.

While Americans can help spur discussions and offer guidance on how Iraq might become a more peaceful country, “we can’t win the peace for them,” Ernst said. “We can’t want it more than they do.” She compared peacebuilding in the country to the U.S. military mission of training, advising and assisting Iraqi soldiers. The program has had success in pushing Iraqi leaders to the fore rather than having their troops look to Americans. The same dynamic needs to unfold in efforts to make peace in the fractured country, she said.

Related Publications

What Will Become of Iraqis in Al-Hol?

What Will Become of Iraqis in Al-Hol?

Thursday, November 19, 2020

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed

The al-Hol camp in northeast Syria—which holds tens of thousands who were living among ISIS before its territorial defeat—has presented the region and international community with a host of thorny challenges. What to do with the camp’s residents has particularly bedeviled the Kurdish authorities who run the camp as well as the governments of countries where residents came from. On October 5, Kurdish authorities said they would release the Syrians in the camp, where conditions have become increasingly unsustainable. But, nearly half of the camps’ 65,000 residents are Iraqis, and their prospect for return remains deeply uncertain. USIP’s Sarhang Hamasaeed discusses the situation facing Iraqis in al-Hol and the challenges ahead if they indeed return.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Violent Extremism; Reconciliation

Amid Iraq’s Turmoil, Tal Afar Builds Peace

Amid Iraq’s Turmoil, Tal Afar Builds Peace

Thursday, November 5, 2020

By: USIP Staff

In a year of Iraqi turmoil, including protests that ousted a government and rivalry between Iran and Turkey, Iraqi tribal and community leaders are strengthening a new peace agreement in a locale that has seen some of the worst brutality of recent years—the northern city of Tal Afar. Civic, tribal and government leaders recently agreed to a pact that can open a path for more than 60,000 displaced residents to return home and rebuild following the war with ISIS. The accord also will help curb ISIS’ effort to revive. And in a startling change, it was negotiated in part by women.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Peace Processes; Gender

Iraq One Year After its Seismic Protests Began

Iraq One Year After its Seismic Protests Began

Thursday, October 15, 2020

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed; Dr. Elie Abouaoun

Iraqis hit the streets in unprecedented numbers last October, calling for political and economic reforms, greater job opportunities for youth, and better government services. In the year since, the country has been rocked by a number of developments, including growing U.S.-Iran tensions playing out on Iraqi soil, the COVID pandemic, and increasing citizen disenchantment with the country’s political system and its sectarian foundation. USIP’s Sarhang Hamasaeed and Elie Abouaoun look at where Iraq’s protest movement stands today, the economic impact of COVID, the prime minister’s call for early elections, and U.S.-Iraq relations.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance

View All Publications