U.S. Senator Joni Ernst said that despite Americans’ weariness with U.S. involvement in Iraq, concerns about terrorism and regional stability make a continuing military commitment in the country a necessity.

“Our first and our highest priority must be to ensure that the Iraqi government has the equipment and the training to conduct sustained and resilient counterterrorism operations,” Ernst said at the U.S. Institute of Peace. “Unless we are confident in Iraq’s capacity and ability to defend themselves, U.S. presence in Iraq will remain necessary to protect our interests.”

Senator Joni Ernst discusses U.S. policy options in Iraq at the U.S. Institute of Peace on July 26, 2018.

An On-the-Ground Perspective

Ernst, who got an on-the-ground view of Iraq as commander of a transport company operating out of Kuwait in 2003, said the experience left her with a keen desire to promote peace and prosperity in a region devastated by war over the past 15 years. Ernst, an Iowa Republican, said that from her position as a senator and chair of the Armed Services Committee’s subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, she is working to be a part of the solution for Iraq. 

Beyond counterterrorism, America’s interests in Iraq include blunting the influence of the country’s neighbor, Iran, and Russia, which she said is seeking inroads. Ernst said she rejected the premise that the U.S. and Iran shared any strategic interest simply because both wanted to defeat ISIS. Iran’s strategic goals will be impeded by a strong, prosperous, Western-allied Iraq, which will depend to a large degree, she said, on the U.S. staying the course in its mission to train, advise and assist Iraqi forces. 

If the U.S. turns its back on the country, cutting the security assistance that has significantly improved its military capability, terrorism could re-emerge and the government will look elsewhere—and very likely to Russia, she said. 

Supporting Iraq’s Development

Ernst said the U.S. must now find ways to support Iraq’s development as a free and democratic society. Specifically, she said the U.S. must work with international partners to support ethnic and religious minorities, who she said had suffered the most from ISIS and other violence in the country. Rather than providing blanket funding for stability operations, the U.S. should make a priority of those communities through USAID rather than wait for the United Nations and other international organizations, she said. 

“To accomplish this, the U.S. must work with groups and partners, such as the U.S. Institute of Peace, who have the relationships and access necessary to reach these communities in areas still plagued by violence,” Ernst said.

While Americans can help spur discussions and offer guidance on how Iraq might become a more peaceful country, “we can’t win the peace for them,” Ernst said. “We can’t want it more than they do.” She compared peacebuilding in the country to the U.S. military mission of training, advising and assisting Iraqi soldiers. The program has had success in pushing Iraqi leaders to the fore rather than having their troops look to Americans. The same dynamic needs to unfold in efforts to make peace in the fractured country, she said.


Related Research & Analysis

What Does ‘Maximum Pressure’ on Iran Mean for Iraq?

What Does ‘Maximum Pressure’ on Iran Mean for Iraq?

Thursday, March 13, 2025

On March 8, the United States allowed a waiver to expire that had permitted Iraq to buy Iranian electricity. The move was the latest in the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign to cut off Iran’s revenue streams and push Tehran to negotiate over its controversial nuclear program. The waiver dates back to President Trump’s first term. In 2018, Trump withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which had granted Iran sanctions relief in return for curbing its nuclear program and expanding cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog.

Type: Question and Answer

The Current Situation in Iraq

The Current Situation in Iraq

Monday, February 10, 2025

Iraq continues to recover from cycles of conflict that have displaced millions of people and caused widespread destruction. As the country rebuilds domestically and reintegrates into the region and the international community, it also needs to improve governance, diversify its economy and address water insecurity, among other challenges. Iraq also continues to grapple with the lasting human legacies of ISIS, including the reintegration of returnees from al-Hol camp in Northeast Syria and internally displaced persons.

Type: Fact Sheet

Stigmatization Experienced by Families with Perceived ISIS Affiliation in Anbar Province

Stigmatization Experienced by Families with Perceived ISIS Affiliation in Anbar Province

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

This discussion paper addresses the challenge of stigmatization faced by families in Iraq with perceived ISIS affiliation, particularly in Anbar province, where many have lived in the al-Hol camp. This stigma arises from community beliefs about their connection to ISIS through male relatives or past residence in ISIS-controlled areas. Stigmatization impacts these families' ability to reintegrate and includes harassment, rejection, property appropriation, and legal and social barriers. The paper includes key research findings and policy recommendations in response to these findings.

Type: Discussion Paper

How Assad’s Fall Could Impact Iraq

How Assad’s Fall Could Impact Iraq

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

The fall of President Bashar al-Assad earlier this month and what comes next in Syria will likely have significant security, political and other implications for Iraq. The situation is dynamic and could evolve in favor of Iraq’s stability or pose new challenges for the country. Iraq is one of a key group of actors — along with Iran, Turkey, the Gulf countries and the United States — whose actions could significantly impact Syria’s trajectory in the months ahead.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis