The Catholic Church, with its 1.2 billion adherents worldwide, has been pivotal in some of the most significant nonviolent struggles in modern history. Many will recall the iconic image of Filipino religious sisters confronting military forces and a kleptocratic dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos in prayerful resistance during the 1986 “people power” revolution. Today, Filipino religious leaders, facing another violent dictator, Rodrigo Duterte, once again are the leading face of nonviolent resistance. The Vatican is discussing these and other examples of powerful nonviolent movements as it rethinks its long-held doctrine of “just war.”

Pope Francis in Malacanang

In his 2017 World Day of Peace address, Pope Francis pledged “the assistance of the Church in every effort to build peace through active and creative nonviolence.” Some experts saw the statement as a signal that the Church is considering altering its doctrine that empowers rulers to wage war only as a last resort to confront grave wrongs. Even proponents of just war acknowledge that the doctrine’s principles of “right cause” and “last resort”, used to justify military intervention, are often not applied rigorously. There is an over-emphasis on the military option at the expense of other, nonviolent options. The result is under-investment in the latter. For that reason, Church leaders are increasingly emphasizing a different paradigm oriented around “just peace”. 

Just peace, a concept with strong interfaith backing, is grounded in the notion that peace is sustainable when it addresses the underlying injustices and exclusionary policies that fuel grievances. It recognizes the power of nonviolent methods to disrupt unjust systems and to resolve conflicts.

The effectiveness of nonviolent options—including civil resistance, dialogue, mediation, negotiation, unarmed civilian protection and transitional justice—is grounded in the skills and legitimacy of those using them. The Church, from the Vatican down to local communities, can play an important role in advancing just peace globally by building strategic and tactical bridges between grassroots nonviolent action and peacebuilding.

Practically, this can be done several ways. The Church can support training and education in the full menu of nonviolent options and their strategic applications in parishes and on university campuses, as they have done in the Philippines, Colombia, Israel and Palestine. During the 1986 revolution in the Philippines, priests and nuns, in partnership with the International Fellowship of Reconciliation, trained their communities in nonviolence and nonviolent action, paving the way to a peaceful end to the Marcos regime.

Inter-Religious Movements for Peace

Investing in inter-religious initiatives and field-based programming with conflict-affected communities is another powerful step the Church can take. In 2001, Sister Marie-Bernard Alima created the Coordination of Women for Democracy in Peace, a civil society network organizing women peacebuilders in the Democratic Republic of Congo to promote human rights, transitional justice and trauma healing for victims of sexual and gender-based violence. Similarly, in South Sudan, where post-independence civil war and a dictatorship have created a humanitarian crisis, the inter-denominational South Sudan Council of Churches has developed and issued an Action Plan for Peace focused on dialogue and reconciliation. Peacebuilding efforts in South Sudan might benefit from greater focus on nonviolent mobilization and “people power.”

The Church can continue to play an active role in transitional justice and reconciliation after conflict. In Chile, the Church advocated for the country’s Commission on Truth and Reconciliation following Pinochet’s removal from power in 1990. The Chilean commission helped inspire the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission shepherded by Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

At the higher levels, the Church can employ diplomatic pressure to hold political leaders accountable. During the Polish Solidarity movement in the 1980s, Pope John Paul II, with local priests and nuns, famously stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the worker‐led movement that challenged Communist tyranny with nonviolent resistance. The Vatican Secretary of State and Holy See missions to the United Nations in New York and Geneva can use existing initiatives, like the Sustaining Peace Resolutions and the Sustainable Development Goals, to advance just peace approaches and tools.

Church Pressure on Military Forces

Church leaders also can communicate with government officials and security forces to deter violent crackdowns against peaceful activists. This might include working with the military to support unarmed peacekeeping pilots in places like Syria and South Sudan. In addition, Church officials could encourage military leaders in the U.S. and partner nations to use training, funding and education to strengthen governance in partner defense institutions, and to deter repression and human rights abuses. A guide written by former Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, a retired U.S. Navy admiral, shows how this could be done in practice.

Logistically, the Church also can provide safe spaces in places like the DRC, South Sudan, Venezuela and Cambodia, where activists and peacebuilders can meet, strategize and plan actions. It can offer small resources and transportation for those forced to operate in restrictive environments, often with little or no money. It can also work with Catholic and other private foundations to support flexible grant-giving that contributes to just and sustainable peace.

A papal encyclical on nonviolent action and just peace, building on Pope Francis’ Peace Day address, would help focus the Church’s energy and resources on all these options and bolster its global work to advance alternatives to violence.

This post is an excerpt from Stephan’s keynote address for the University of San Diego conference: “‘The Catholic Church Moves Toward Nonviolence? Just Peace and Just War in Dialogue.” You can find the full address here.

Related Publications

Central African Republic: A Role for Religious Leaders in Calming Conflict?

Central African Republic: A Role for Religious Leaders in Calming Conflict?

Tuesday, December 22, 2020

By: Laura Collins

Presidential and legislative elections loom large in the Central African Republic (CAR) amid high tension and spikes in violence. CAR’s religious leaders have been on the frontlines of efforts to calm tensions ahead of polls opening on December 27. From religious leaders in the capital to those at the grass roots, they have made their voices and positions clear. The question, therefore, is not if religious leaders are crucial actors in conflict stabilization and peace efforts in CAR: They already are. Rather, policymakers and practitioners should be unpacking these leaders’ experiences—past and present—and asking how to strengthen their role as peacebuilding partners in the immediate post-electoral context and longer-term.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Religion

Four Thoughts on Advancing Religious Engagement in Diplomacy and Development

Four Thoughts on Advancing Religious Engagement in Diplomacy and Development

Tuesday, December 1, 2020

By: Peter Mandaville, Ph.D.

After nearly 20 years and across three successive U.S. administrations, it is clear that a bipartisan consensus exists among senior foreign affairs leadership that engaging religious actors to advance key American diplomatic, national security, and development objectives needs to be a priority. With some 84 percent of the world’s population expressing a faith affiliation, the role of religion as a social force around the world—and one that figures centrally in many peacebuilding contexts—cannot be ignored in our foreign relations.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Religion

Knox Thames on the State of Global Religious Freedom

Knox Thames on the State of Global Religious Freedom

Monday, November 30, 2020

By: Knox Thames

As global restrictions on faith reach all-time highs, USIP’s Knox Thames say the United States must continue to be a vocal leader in combatting persecution and pursuing religious freedom, saying, “I think the time is right … anything we say goes out like a megaphone to the rest of the world.”

Type: Podcast

Religion

Human Rights Education as the Solution to Religious Persecution

Human Rights Education as the Solution to Religious Persecution

Monday, November 23, 2020

By: Knox Thames

Persecution on account of religion or belief confronts every community somewhere around the world—and it is an increasing trend. Challenges range from terrorist violence against minorities, such as ISIS’ depravations against Yazidis, to persecution by authoritarian governments, with China’s targeting of all faiths a prime example. To organize a defense of freedom of conscience and belief, the United States convened the Ministerial to Advance Freedom of Religion or Belief in 2018 and 2019, bringing together a virtual congress of nations and civil society activists from around the world. The third ministerial, organized by Poland, was held virtually in mid-November. Discussions identified challenges but also solutions. One consistent answer to the vexing problem of persecution was proffered: educating youth about human rights and pluralism.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Religion; Education & Training

View All Publications