As China’s role in global political and economic affairs has expanded, so has its exposure to international and domestic terrorism. At the same time, it is constrained in its response by two long-held principles—nonintervention and noninterference. This Peace Brief discusses the threats to China, its response, and how these might affect its participation in global counterterrorism efforts.


  • China’s main interests in relation to international terrorism are ensuring domestic stability in its ethnically troubled Xinjiang region, promoting regional stability in key resource and export markets, and protecting its citizens and businesses abroad.
  • Beijing’s primary response to international terrorism has been to strengthen its domestic counterterrorism capabilities by passing and implementing new national security and counterterrorism laws, increasing policing and social control in Xinjiang, and engaging in bilateral and multilateral counterterrorism efforts.
  • Primary constraints on further engagement are its focus on domestic terrorism, long-held principles of nonintervention and noninterference, a desire to prevent backlash that results in more targeting of Chinese citizens at home and abroad, and limited military capability.
  • As China’s global economic and political footprint grows, it will likely increasingly be the target and victim of international terrorist acts.
  • In the foreseeable future, it is unlikely China will become a major actor in fighting global terrorism and US-China cooperation in counterterrorism activities will remain limited.


In a March 2017 video reported by Al Jazeera, the self-proclaimed Islamic State (IS) pledged to “shed blood like rivers” in attacks against Chinese targets. Over the last two decades, Chinese citizens, businesses, peacekeepers, and government facilities have been targets and victims of international terrorism. This year, for example, two Chinese teachers engaged in Christian missionary activities were executed by IS in Pakistan. In 2016, a Chinese citizen was killed in an al-Qaeda attack on a luxury resort and Chinese UN peacekeepers were killed in two separate attacks in Mali; the Chinese embassy in Kyrgyzstan was the victim of a suicide attack by a terrorist with supposed links to Uighur separatists in China; and a Chinese businessperson was killed in an IS bombing of Belgium’s Brussels airport. Between 2004 and 2014, Chinese citizens died in terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, Cameroon, Jordan, Kenya, Malaysia, Mali, Pakistan, Syria, Thailand, and the United States.1 Numerous Chinese have also died in domestic terrorist incidents within China’s borders.

China’s Interests in Combating Transnational Terrorism

China’s interests are driven by a desire to ensure domestic stability in Xinjiang and throughout China, to promote regional stability (especially in Central Asia, South Asia, the Middle East, and Africa), and to protect Chinese citizens and businesses abroad.

Especially since the outbreak of riots and violence in Xinjiang in 2009, the Arab Awakening in 2011, and a string of high-profile terrorist attacks within China’s borders (including a suicide bombing under Mao’s portrait in Tiananmen Square, a mass knife attack in a Kunming train station, and a number of violent incidents in Xinjiang), China’s sensitivity to the potential impact of international terrorism on domestic stability in China has escalated.2 In particular, Beijing is concerned that Uighurs will join transnational terrorist organizations such as IS and al-Qaeda and return to China radicalized and ready to disturb the social order. They also worry that external funding will be funneled to Islamic insurgency groups within China by sympathetic outside groups. Although China’s fears of domestic terrorism, insurgency, and potential international links are often exaggerated and its treatment of Uighurs strongly contributes to unrest and violent incidents, Beijing is genuinely concerned that it is vulnerable to terrorism and fears perceived insurgency activity in Xinjiang that could threaten China’s territorial integrity.

Beijing is concerned that Uighurs will join transnational terrorist organizations and return to China radicalized and ready to disturb the social order.

An estimated ten million Muslim Uighurs live in western Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region.3 Over the years, Uighurs have engaged in a series of terrorist acts against Han Chinese, both in Xinjiang but also in eastern provinces. China has long expressed concern about the effect that international terrorism might have on potential domestic insurgency in Xinjiang. Over the last decade, these worries have increased noticeably—especially about both the Turkistan Islamic Party and the Uighur Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement, officially designated a terrorist organization by the US State Department and INTERPOL at the urging of the Chinese government after September 11. More specifically, China is concerned that Uighurs could join IS and other terrorist groups as foreign fighters in Syria and Southeast Asia and then return to China and encourage violence at home.4 Although it is widely believed that the actual impact of the Uighur Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement, and the Turkistan Islamic Party on violence in Xinjiang is minimal, Beijing’s concerns about these linkages are real and drive its approach to terrorism at home and abroad.

Another major concern in relation to international terrorism is regional stability in the Middle East, Africa, Central Asia, and South Asia. These regions are key to resource security for China and provide significant market opportunities for Chinese businesses (state-owned and private) in a wide variety of sectors. For example, today China is the world’s largest net oil importer. More than 70 percent of this oil originates in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa. These regions are also major markets for Chinese exports (of both goods and services) and increasingly important investment opportunities. For example, according to IMF data, in 2015, China’s product exports to the Middle East had risen to $155 billion and exports to sub-Saharan Africa were $83 billion. Its new Belt and Road Initiative only amplifies China’s need for stability in the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa as well as in South Asia and Central Asia. International terrorism in the form of groups such as IS, al-Qaeda, and Boko Haram endanger the internal stability of many countries in those regions as well as increase the potential for international conflict that ultimately could threaten China’s economic and resource interests.

Finally, Beijing increasingly needs to protect its citizens and businesses overseas. As China’s global footprint expands, its vulnerability to attacks by transnational terror groups increases.5 The Chinese Communist Party also claims that the Chinese public is escalating pressure on them to protect Chinese citizens and businesses abroad. Each additional violent incident perpetrated by an international terrorist group increases that pressure.

China’s Response to International Terrorism

China’s most forceful response to international terrorism has been conducted within its borders. Although Beijing has emphasized suppressing potential domestic terrorist activity for decades, since the 2009 Xinjiang riots it has cracked down more severely on Xinjiang and elsewhere across the nation. Examples of increased repression in the name of preventing transnational and domestic terrorism include the new national security law and counterterrorism law (both enacted in 2015) as well as a wide range of policing activities and tightening of social control in Xinjiang.6 In addition to deploying an increased presence of the People’s Liberation Army and the People’s Armed Police to Xinjiang, Beijing often restricts religious practices in an attempt to combat the emergence of terrorist threats.

After its domestic efforts, Beijing’s next strongest focus is on bilateral counterterrorism cooperation and multilateral efforts in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum (CASCF), and the United Nations. China’s bilateral counterterrorism partners are primarily in Central, South, and Southeast Asia. Counterterrorism was one of the reasons that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization was originally founded and the CASCF increasingly stresses the need for multilateral cooperation in this area. China’s counterterrorism work in the United Nations is through the Counter-terrorism Implementation Taskforce.

Finally, China also engages in more indirect international activity to help minimize the possibility of international and domestic terrorism having an environment in which to thrive. For example, it participates in UN peacekeeping operations to foster stability in societies at high risk for the development of terrorist organizations. Its Syria vetoes in the UN Security Council can partially be attributed to its view that external interference in the conflict is likely to prolong the civil war and strengthen groups that have links to international terrorist organizations. Also, via the CASCF, China solicits support from leaders throughout the Arab world for its counterterrorism actions in Xinjiang and its attempts to prevent the flow of support from Arab societies to potentially radicalized groups in China. Last, China’s economic development activities in Xinjiang and throughout Central Asia can be seen as part of a larger effort to proactively limit the spread of transnational terrorism within China and on its borders.

Constraints on China’s International Counterterrorism Actions

Although China wants to prevent the spread of international terrorism, its related global activities are constrained. One reason is prioritizing domestic terrorism over international. Tensions also exist between engagement in counterterrorism activities and respect for China’s key norms of international interaction. China’s primary stance is nonintervention and noninterference. Unless a state explicitly invites China to conduct counterterrorism activities within its borders, such efforts would directly contradict the Five Principles. China also wants to avoid becoming more of a target of terrorism both domestically and internationally than it already is. In its view, engaging in international counterterrorism activities would increase that probability. Finally, China has a limited capability and footprint outside its borders to engage in counterterrorism activities. Other than a newly established base in Djibouti, China does not have military bases abroad to support intensive counterterrorism initiatives.


As Beijing plays an increasingly influential role in global political and economic affairs, its exposure to international and domestic terrorism is likely to grow. Its Belt and Road Initiative—a development strategy focusing on cooperation with Eurasian countries—will expand China’s involvement in many regions where it is already a target of international terrorism, including Central, South, and Southeast Asia as well as the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa. China has of course been engaged with these regions for many years, but President Xi Jinping’s emphasis on the initiative will likely increase Chinese investment, foreign aid, trade relations, and diplomatic interactions and result in even more Chinese citizens and businesses pursuing opportunities in these countries. China’s military base in Djibouti will increase its ability to protect Chinese citizens overseas. That said, given its strong adherence to the principle of noninterference and its fears of backlash from global terrorist groups, in the near term China is likely to continue to focus its counterterrorism efforts on combating domestic threats and participating in related bilateral and multilateral efforts on a limited basis. For the foreseeable future, US–China cooperation on the issue will likely remain minimal.


  1. Matthieu Duchatel, “Terror Overseas: Understanding China’s Evolving Counter-Terror Strategy,” Policy Brief, European Council on Foreign Relations, October 2016.
  2. In July 2009, large-scale violence broke out between ethnic Han Chinese and Uighurs in Xinjiang. According to Chinese authorities, 137 of those killed were Han, forty-six were Uighur, and one was from the Hui ethnic group (Edward Wong, “China Raises Death Toll in Ethnic Clashes to 184,” New York Times, July 10, 2009); Murray Scot Tanner with James Bellacqua, “China’s Response to Terrorism” (Washington, DC: CNA and the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, June 2016).
  3. US Commission on International Religious Freedom, “China,” in Annual Report 2017 (Washington, DC: USCIRF, June 2017).
  4. Michael Clark, “China’s Terrorist Problem Goes Global,” The Diplomat, September 7, 2016,
  5. David Shambaugh and Dawn Murphy, “US-China Interactions in the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and Latin America” in Tangled Titans: The New Context of US-China Relations, ed. David Shambaugh (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2012); Dawn Murphy, “China and the Middle East,” testimony before the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, June 6, 2013.
  6. USCIRF, “China.”

About this Brief

This Brief discusses the threat that international terrorism poses to China, China’s response, and constraints on China’s engagement in global counterterrorism activities. It is supported by the Asia Center at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). Dawn Murphy is an assistant professor of international security studies at the US Air War College. Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Air University, the US Air Force, the Department of Defense, any other US government agency, or USIP.

Related Publications

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Monday, February 19, 2024

By: USIP Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its four partner countries in the Indo-Pacific—Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), and New Zealand—have entered a period of increased engagement. This engagement is taking shape in the context of the war waged by the Russian Federation (Russia) against Ukraine, NATO’s growing awareness of the security challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China (China), and important structural changes in the international system, including the return of strategic competition between the United States and China and Russia. It is occurring not only in bilateral NATO-partner relations but also between NATO and these Indo-Pacific countries as a group.

Type: Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionCivilian-Military RelationsGlobal PolicyMediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Two Years Later, What Has the Indo-Pacific Strategy Achieved?

Two Years Later, What Has the Indo-Pacific Strategy Achieved?

Thursday, February 15, 2024

By: Carla Freeman, Ph.D.;  Mirna Galic;  Daniel Markey, Ph.D.;  Vikram J. Singh

This month marks the second anniversary of the Biden administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy (IPS). USIP experts Carla Freeman, Mirna Galic, Daniel Markey, and Vikram Singh assess what the strategy has accomplished in the past two years, how it has navigated global shocks and its impact on partnerships in the region.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications