Secretary of State John Kerry contested what he called “revisionist commentary” about the Obama administration’s foreign policy, laying out a defense of achievements such as a global climate change agreement and the Iran nuclear accord, as part of the U.S. Institute of Peace’s “Passing the Baton” conference on Jan. 10. Kerry also shared his concerns about what he called the “fact-less political environment” and the President-elect’s penchant for communicating foreign policy positions on Twitter. 

Woodruff and Kerry

“What troubles me a little bit is that people are not separating a remarkable transformation that has taken place globally, naturally, from things that we’re really responsible for,” Kerry said in a discussion with Judy Woodruff, anchor and managing editor of PBS NewsHour. “Arab Spring -- we didn’t start the Arab Spring. We couldn’t have stopped the Arab Spring. We couldn’t have put a lid on it.”

The revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa, most of which deteriorated into violent conflict, happened spontaneously, he said, “because of where those countries found themselves relative to modernity, to the global economies, to their own governance challenges and to the centuries old passions and definitions and differences that have defined those countries for a long time.”

“But as I listen to some of the revisionist commentary, and they’re saying, 'Well the Obama administration didn’t do this or didn’t do that or whatever.' There’s no way the Obama administration doing anything would have changed what was happening in those countries.”

For the U.S., Kerry said that the rise of the “fact-less political environment” has had dire consequences for the nation’s capability to effectively confront major foreign policy and national security issues, including China, Russia and the fragility of states where governance is weakened by incompetence or illegitimacy and makes movements such as violent extremist groups seem like desirable alternatives to some citizens.

“How is democracy going to move faster and more efficiently, given the increasingly hard task of building consensus without the consumption of facts?” he said.

Kerry pledged to work to “restore a measure of accountability to our system” once he’s out of office.

Although not naming Trump directly, Kerry said, “If policy is going to be made in 140 characters on Twitter, and every reasonable measurement of accountability is being bypassed, we have a problem,” Kerry said. His comments were echoed at other points of the conference by speakers such as former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

Kerry bemoaned the lack of critical debate about climate change during the election cycle, as well as other crucial topics that were overlooked amid more salacious subjects.

When asked about the transition at the State Department from President Obama’s administration to President-elect Trump’s, Kerry said it was going “pretty smoothly,” primarily because “there hasn’t been a lot of it.”

He said he hasn’t yet met his replacement, former ExxonMobil chief Rex Tillerson, who testified today in a nomination hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “I’m still expecting to meet with my successor at some point in the near term,” Kerry said.

Related Publications

Myanmar’s Fateful Conscription Law

Myanmar’s Fateful Conscription Law

Monday, February 26, 2024

By: Ye Myo Hein

Earlier this month, Myanmar’s ruling junta enacted a compulsory conscription law that had been dormant since 2010. General Guan Maw, a leader of the Kachin Independence Organization, greeted the junta's decision by comparing it to the 2021 military coup: "If February 1, 2021, was the beginning of the end, the law enforced on February 10, 2024, can be said to mark the end of the end.” As popular reactions to the new conscription plan roll out across the country, General Guan Maw’s pronouncement becomes increasingly prescient.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Monday, February 19, 2024

By: USIP Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its four partner countries in the Indo-Pacific—Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), and New Zealand—have entered a period of increased engagement. This engagement is taking shape in the context of the war waged by the Russian Federation (Russia) against Ukraine, NATO’s growing awareness of the security challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China (China), and important structural changes in the international system, including the return of strategic competition between the United States and China and Russia. It is occurring not only in bilateral NATO-partner relations but also between NATO and these Indo-Pacific countries as a group.

Type: Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionCivilian-Military RelationsGlobal PolicyMediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

The Latest @ USIP: Grassroots Efforts to Address Sudan’s Humanitarian Crisis

The Latest @ USIP: Grassroots Efforts to Address Sudan’s Humanitarian Crisis

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

By: Sara Pantuliano

More than half of Sudan’s population of 46 million is in need of humanitarian assistance -- and less than a quarter of them are actually receiving aid amid the country’s civil conflict. Sara Pantuliano, the chief executive for the Overseas Development Institute, discusses the current crisis in Sudan, why Sudan is important for global peace and how grassroots organizations in the country can help deliver aid to places that international organizations cannot reach.

Type: Blog

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications