Iraq’s execution yesterday of 36 men whom it accused of committing the deadliest single atrocity by the Islamic State group underscores that any stabilization of Iraq will require international support to strengthen the country’s overburdened judicial system, according to USIP Iraq specialist Sarhang Hamasaeed. Iraq’s government came under intense pressure from the country’s Shia Muslim majority population, and from the Shia “Popular Mobilization Forces,” or pro-government militias, to conduct the executions, Hamasaeed said.

Iraqi counterterrorism forces move through the heavily damaged Shuhada neighborhood in Fallujah, Iraq, June 18, 2016. The Islamic State’s suicide attack in Baghdad in July, officials say, foreshadows the violence it will unleash as it reverts to its guerrilla roots. A return to guerrilla warfare in Iraq, while the United States and its allies still combat the Islamic State in Syria, would pose one of the first major challenges to the next American president. (Bryan Denton/The New York Times)
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Bryan Denton

Iraq hanged 36 men for the killings yesterday at a prison in the country’s south, the government said. Little information was reported about the trials in which they were convicted. The execution, the largest since Iraq’s war against ISIS began more than two years ago, took place after some elements of the Shia forces threatened to attack Iraqi prisons and execute convicted ISIS militants themselves, Hamasaeed said. Public pressure in Iraq for such executions increased after an ISIS bombing in Baghdad killed more than 300 people last month.

The United Nations and human rights groups voiced concern at the executions. "Given the weaknesses of the Iraqi justice system, and the current environment in Iraq, I am gravely concerned that innocent people have been and may continue to be convicted and executed, " U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement reported by Reuters.

“Steps by the Iraqi government that deliver real justice, and that build a public understanding that justice is being provided by the government, rather than other forces, are important to reconciliation in localized conflicts, which are deepening in the wake of ISIS’s atrocities,” said Hamasaeed. “But there has been so much violence at the retail level, and the Iraqi judiciary does not have the capacity to handle this massive load of extremely sensitive cases. The judiciary will need support to handle this caseload.”

Massacre—and Vengeance Averted

ISIS killed an estimated 1,700 Shia military cadets from Camp Speicher, a former U.S. military base in 2014. The extremist group released horrific videos of the killings, showing the young men being marched in a long column along a highway, bundled into trucks, their hands bound behind them, and then being lined up in fields or on a Tigris River bank to be shot from behind, execution style, their bodies buried in mass graves or shoved into the river.

After the massacre, many Shia called for vengeance. Hundreds of thousands of Sunni residents in and near the city of Tikrit, adjacent to the base and the massacre, fled their homes, many fearing that Shia militias would hold them responsible for the killings and stage revenge attacks.

A pair of Iraqi non-government organizations last year mediated a peace agreement between Shia and Sunni tribes that averted revenge killings. It established a mechanism for vetting returnees to ensure they had not been complicit in the massacre. By  April this year, more than 268,000 displaced people returned to their homes in Tikrit and the surrounding Salahaddin Province.


The talks were co-led by the Network of Iraqi Facilitators, a voluntary association of civil society leaders, including lawyers, human rights activists and a prominent physician, trained in conflict resolution. The facilitators, with an allied group called SANAD for Peacebuilding, have been trained and supported by the U.S. Institute of Peace. The two Iraqi organizations have mediated an end to violence in several other regions of Iraq over the past decade as well.

As the international community supports the Iraqi government’s offensive to push ISIS from the remaining areas it controls in Iraq, including the second-largest city, Mosul, they will have to support such local peacemaking efforts across the country, according to Hamasaeed, a USIP senior program officer.

The Iraqi military, with help from U.S. troops, is preparing an assault to recapture Mosul from ISIS and news reports say the attack could come within months. “But military triumphs are unlikely to lead to an enduring peace without … reconciliation,” Hamasaeed wrote last month in Defense One. “While it’s obviously critical to provide electricity and water, and to build health clinics and schools, it also is essential that the conflicts underlying the destruction be understood and addressed,” in order to stabilize Mosul and other cities after they are retaken from ISIS, Hamasaeed wrote in an essay with USIP President Nancy Lindborg. 

Of the many local conflicts tackled so far by the Iraqi peacemaking groups, “the Speicher intervention is one of a kind,” said Abdul Aziz al-Jarba, a leader in the facilitators’ network. “It was the first time to have an intervention on such a dangerous and critical issue,” al Jarba said in an interview last year. “We think it could be an example for other situations in the future.”

Related Publications

Al-Hol: Displacement Crisis is a Tinderbox that Could Ignite ISIS 2.0

Al-Hol: Displacement Crisis is a Tinderbox that Could Ignite ISIS 2.0

Wednesday, May 11, 2022

By: Mona Yacoubian

More than three years after ISIS’s territorial defeat, the vexing challenge of displacement threatens to provoke the rise of ISIS 2.0 if not adequately addressed. The May 11 Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS ministerial meeting in Marrakech, Morocco highlights these concerns over the evolving threat the so-called Islamic State still poses. The Marrakech meeting coincides with both growing disquiet at deteriorating humanitarian and security conditions in the al-Hol displacement camp in northeast Syria — ground zero for the ISIS-related displacement crisis — and some hope for a path forward.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Human RightsViolent Extremism

A New Test for Iraq’s Democracy and Stability

A New Test for Iraq’s Democracy and Stability

Monday, March 7, 2022

By: Knox Thames;  Sarhang Hamasaeed

The sudden crisis around Russia threatens democratic norms and energy markets worldwide, only heightening the urgency of stabilizing Iraq, the world’s fifth-largest oil producer. Yet five months after Iraq’s elections, held in response to massive protests against ineffective governance, political factions remain dangerously deadlocked in efforts to form a new government. Shaping a more stable, peaceful Iraq—and responding to the 2019-2020 grassroots demands for democratic, accountable governance—will require a fuller inclusion of Iraq’s ethnic and religious minorities. Yet the prospects remain unclear. Iraq’s minority communities are watching carefully, as their future depends on it. 

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance

Iraq’s Election Raises More Questions Than Answers

Iraq’s Election Raises More Questions Than Answers

Thursday, October 21, 2021

By: Dr. Elie Abouaoun

Muqtada al-Sadr, a Shia cleric whose Mahdi Army followers battled U.S. forces during the years of the occupation, made big gains in Iraq’s parliamentary election on October 10. His victory could pose problems for the United States and Iran. But despite the Sadrist List’s electoral success, it is not a given that al-Sadr will be the next man to lead Iraq, or even be the only kingmaker. USIP’s Elie Abouaoun examines the outcome of the election, the electoral process and the implications for Iraq’s future.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance

View All Publications