Iraq’s execution yesterday of 36 men whom it accused of committing the deadliest single atrocity by the Islamic State group underscores that any stabilization of Iraq will require international support to strengthen the country’s overburdened judicial system, according to USIP Iraq specialist Sarhang Hamasaeed. Iraq’s government came under intense pressure from the country’s Shia Muslim majority population, and from the Shia “Popular Mobilization Forces,” or pro-government militias, to conduct the executions, Hamasaeed said.

Iraqi counterterrorism forces move through the heavily damaged Shuhada neighborhood in Fallujah, Iraq, June 18, 2016. The Islamic State’s suicide attack in Baghdad in July, officials say, foreshadows the violence it will unleash as it reverts to its guerrilla roots. A return to guerrilla warfare in Iraq, while the United States and its allies still combat the Islamic State in Syria, would pose one of the first major challenges to the next American president. (Bryan Denton/The New York Times)
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Bryan Denton

Iraq hanged 36 men for the killings yesterday at a prison in the country’s south, the government said. Little information was reported about the trials in which they were convicted. The execution, the largest since Iraq’s war against ISIS began more than two years ago, took place after some elements of the Shia forces threatened to attack Iraqi prisons and execute convicted ISIS militants themselves, Hamasaeed said. Public pressure in Iraq for such executions increased after an ISIS bombing in Baghdad killed more than 300 people last month.

The United Nations and human rights groups voiced concern at the executions. "Given the weaknesses of the Iraqi justice system, and the current environment in Iraq, I am gravely concerned that innocent people have been and may continue to be convicted and executed, " U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement reported by Reuters.

“Steps by the Iraqi government that deliver real justice, and that build a public understanding that justice is being provided by the government, rather than other forces, are important to reconciliation in localized conflicts, which are deepening in the wake of ISIS’s atrocities,” said Hamasaeed. “But there has been so much violence at the retail level, and the Iraqi judiciary does not have the capacity to handle this massive load of extremely sensitive cases. The judiciary will need support to handle this caseload.”

Massacre—and Vengeance Averted

ISIS killed an estimated 1,700 Shia military cadets from Camp Speicher, a former U.S. military base in 2014. The extremist group released horrific videos of the killings, showing the young men being marched in a long column along a highway, bundled into trucks, their hands bound behind them, and then being lined up in fields or on a Tigris River bank to be shot from behind, execution style, their bodies buried in mass graves or shoved into the river.

After the massacre, many Shia called for vengeance. Hundreds of thousands of Sunni residents in and near the city of Tikrit, adjacent to the base and the massacre, fled their homes, many fearing that Shia militias would hold them responsible for the killings and stage revenge attacks.

A pair of Iraqi non-government organizations last year mediated a peace agreement between Shia and Sunni tribes that averted revenge killings. It established a mechanism for vetting returnees to ensure they had not been complicit in the massacre. By  April this year, more than 268,000 displaced people returned to their homes in Tikrit and the surrounding Salahaddin Province.

chart

The talks were co-led by the Network of Iraqi Facilitators, a voluntary association of civil society leaders, including lawyers, human rights activists and a prominent physician, trained in conflict resolution. The facilitators, with an allied group called SANAD for Peacebuilding, have been trained and supported by the U.S. Institute of Peace. The two Iraqi organizations have mediated an end to violence in several other regions of Iraq over the past decade as well.

As the international community supports the Iraqi government’s offensive to push ISIS from the remaining areas it controls in Iraq, including the second-largest city, Mosul, they will have to support such local peacemaking efforts across the country, according to Hamasaeed, a USIP senior program officer.

The Iraqi military, with help from U.S. troops, is preparing an assault to recapture Mosul from ISIS and news reports say the attack could come within months. “But military triumphs are unlikely to lead to an enduring peace without … reconciliation,” Hamasaeed wrote last month in Defense One. “While it’s obviously critical to provide electricity and water, and to build health clinics and schools, it also is essential that the conflicts underlying the destruction be understood and addressed,” in order to stabilize Mosul and other cities after they are retaken from ISIS, Hamasaeed wrote in an essay with USIP President Nancy Lindborg. 

Of the many local conflicts tackled so far by the Iraqi peacemaking groups, “the Speicher intervention is one of a kind,” said Abdul Aziz al-Jarba, a leader in the facilitators’ network. “It was the first time to have an intervention on such a dangerous and critical issue,” al Jarba said in an interview last year. “We think it could be an example for other situations in the future.”

Related Publications

Nancy Lindborg on Iraq Rebuilding After ISIS

Nancy Lindborg on Iraq Rebuilding After ISIS

Thursday, April 11, 2019

By: Nancy Lindborg

Following her trip to Iraq, Nancy Lindborg discusses the country’s efforts to rebuild after ISIS. “They’ve [ISIS] been deprived of their territory … rebuilding is under way. But, there is very much a sense that the ISIS ideology is alive and well and there are a lot of concerns overall about security,” says Lindborg. “There has been important progress, but it’s very precarious and completely reversible.”

Reconciliation; Violent Extremism

Reaching a Durable Peace in Afghanistan and Iraq: Learning from Investments in Women’s Programming

Reaching a Durable Peace in Afghanistan and Iraq: Learning from Investments in Women’s Programming

Friday, March 29, 2019

By: Danielle Robertson; Steven E. Steiner

USIP recently partnered with New America to convene roundtable discussions with government, civil society, and humanitarian, development, and peacebuilding organizations to learn from the past decade of women’s programming in fragile states such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Based on these discussions, this report provides guidance for improving future programming to not only integrate the needs of women but also recognize the role women play in transforming violent conflict and sustaining a durable peace.

Gender

The Current Situation in Iraq

The Current Situation in Iraq

Friday, March 29, 2019

Iraq has been ravaged in recent years by cycles of warfare, an internally displaced persons (IDPs) crisis, crippling sectarianism and, most destructively, a three-year campaign to drive ISIS from the third of the country it controlled. Even after the military defeat of ISIS, Iraq continues to face severe challenges including resolving the political, sectarian, and tribal conflicts that fueled the spread of extremism and its entanglement in regional rivalries.

View All Publications