A military victory over the Taliban and other insurgents in Afghanistan is unlikely, and the parties to the conflict must try to resolve it through negotiations, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said today.

PM Sharif

“Over the past 14 years a military solution has been elusive,” Sharif said in a speech at the U.S. Institute of Peace, referring to the Afghan war, the United States’ longest in history. “We believe it’s unlikely to be achieved in the future, thus achieving peace through negotiation is the best option.”

Sharif said Pakistan facilitated the first official peace talks, in July, between the Afghan government and the Taliban, but Taliban officials canceled a second round after news emerged that their movement’s iconic leader, Mullah Omar, had died.

“Without the authority of their leader to engage in the dialogue, the Taliban broke off the talks,” Sharif said. Amid an internal struggle over new leadership, “their default option was to revert to a fighting mode,” he said.

Insurgent attacks in Afghanistan are carried out by Taliban who have found safe havens inside that country, Sharif said. The movement originated, and has retained roots, in Pakistani borderlands with Afghanistan. Afghan and U.S. officials for years have accused Pakistan’s military of tolerating or sustaining the Afghan Taliban groups operating from Pakistani territory.

Pakistan is once again prepared to bring the Taliban to peace talks if Afghan President Ashraf Ghani wants to re-engage, Sharif said. But “we cannot bring them to the table and kill them at the same time,” he said, referring to demands from Kabul that Pakistan destroy the Afghan Taliban presence in Pakistan.

Sharif-Obama Talks

Sharif, who has just completed two years in office, met yesterday with President Barack Obama at the White House. Sharif “reaffirmed that Pakistan’s territory will not be used against any other country and noted that this is an obligation of all countries in the region,” said a joint statement issued by the White House.  The United States and Pakistan favor an Afghan-led peace process with the Taliban, it said.

“There’s an urgent need now to get the political process back on track so it can reduce the violence in Afghanistan,” Stephen J. Hadley, chairman of the Board of Directors of the U.S. Institute of Peace, said in his opening remarks. Further deterioration of security in Afghanistan could push the country back to the anarchic days of the 1990s that led to the rise of the Taliban, and all countries in the region want to prevent that outcome, Hadley said.

Sharif became prime minister in 2013 after democratic elections in Pakistan led to a peaceful transfer of power from one civilian government to another for the first time in the country’s history. This is his third term as prime minister.

India-Pakistan Relations

On Pakistan’s relations with India, Sharif said that two opportunities for high-level talks between the countries were canceled by India.

“New Delhi canceled foreign secretary-level talks on flimsy excuse,” Sharif said referring to the August 2014 discussions that India called off after Pakistan’s high commissioner to India met with activists from the Indian-administered region of Kashmir who are seeking separation from India. Kashmir has been disputed between India and Pakistan since the two countries were partitioned at independence from British rule in 1947.

Another set of talks, between the national security advisers of both countries scheduled for this August, was “scuttled by India to limit the talks to one issue and to dictate the program” of Pakistan’s adviser, Sharif said.

India had said that Pakistan’s national security adviser, Sartaj Aziz couldn’t meet with Kashmiri separatists and that the talks should be limited to discussions of terrorism, while Pakistan wanted a broader agenda.

Since these two attempts to revive dialogue had broken down, India has “increased cease-fire violations across” the frontier with Pakistan—and New Delhi is engaged in “a major arms buildup regrettably with the active assistance of several powers,” Sharif said.

The United States is one of India’s largest suppliers of conventional weapons.

Pakistani 'Counter-Measures'

India also “has adopted dangerous military doctrines,” Sharif said. “This will compel Pakistan to take several countermeasures to preserve credible deterrence,” he added.

Days before Sharif arrived in Washington, Pakistan’s foreign secretary, Aizaz Choudhary, said his country had developed low-yield tactical nuclear weapons in response to India’s military plans that call for a swift conventional strike on Pakistan in a future conflict.

Despite the volatile security situation in the region, Sharif said Pakistan’s economy has brightened and levels of violence have fallen since he took office.

Pakistan made a “strategic choice to eliminate all terrorists groups” within the country, Sharif said, noting its military offensive in the region of North Waziristan, a longtime Taliban stronghold on the Afghan border.  That sweep, which began in June 2014, is the largest of its kind in the world, he said.

The operation has destroyed terrorist sanctuaries, command and control networks, and infrastructure, and thousands of terrorist suspects have been captured, Sharif said. “The rest are on the run as the operation goes into its final phase and the few remaining hideouts will be cleared,” he said.

While the North Waziristan offensive “pushed many terrorists out of Pakistan, unfortunately many of those terrorists moved into Afghanistan and that is one of the reasons for the greater violence in Afghanistan, particularly in the north,” Hadley said.

On the economic front, Sharif said Pakistan’s gross domestic product is expected to grow by 5 percent this year, up from a rate of 3.3 percent growth before he took office. Sharif said his government had reduced the state’s budget deficit and controlled inflation by cutting wasteful expenditures. 


Related Publications

Will the IMF’s $7 Billion Bailout Stabilize Pakistan’s Economy?

Will the IMF’s $7 Billion Bailout Stabilize Pakistan’s Economy?

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has approved a $7 billion loan for Pakistan aimed at helping the South Asian nation stabilize its economy. After assuming power earlier this year, Pakistan’s new coalition government led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) had approached the IMF for the 25th time for a loan. On September 12, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said his country had met all the conditions set by the IMF to qualify for a new loan. And on September 25, the IMF signed a formal approval of the loan.

Type: Question and Answer

Economics

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications