Publicly available satellite imaging used to document atrocities in Darfur and wartime destruction in the Syrian city of Aleppo will be tested by scientists in a USIP-funded project to gauge its usefulness in tracking the signs of impending cross-border conflict.

Previous analysis of satellite imagery by AAAS, before and after destruction in Aleppo, Syria, as a result of the current conflict. (Images by DigitalGlobe/Analysis by AAAS)

USIP recently awarded $119,474 to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) to analyze satellite images from six past conflicts in Asia, Eurasia, and Africa. Scientists will be looking for signs such as the massing of troops, construction of trenches, or  the building of military facilities near borders that might in the future help signal looming war. The idea would be to detect evidence of impending fighting without risking the danger of injecting monitors on the ground, and therefore buy time to try to de-escalate potential conflict.

“This is a cutting-edge initiative,” said Katherine Wood, a consultant for USIP who helped screen grant applicants. “The emphasis is on developing an early-warning system.”

One goal of the project is to develop “a promising new tool that will help avert large-scale violent conflict,” said Steven Riskin, special assistant to the president for grants at USIP.

The cross-border conflicts that will be the focus of the AAAS study are Sudan-South Sudan, India-Pakistan, Cambodia-Thailand, Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan, Armenia-Azerbaijan, and a three-day war in 2008 between Eritrea and Djibouti. While government intelligence agencies draw on such technology for their own uses, the AAAS project would examine how publicly available data could be used by those seeking to head off cross-border fighting.

“We’re identifying key dates and time frames from each of the conflicts and obtaining historical satellite imagery to examine,” said Susan Wolfinbarger, who holds a Ph.D. in geography and directs AAAS’s geospatial technologies and human rights project. “What things are there that could have given us hints that a conflict was about to happen?”

The project, which also receives funding from the Geneva-based Oak Foundation, is part of AAAS’s Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights and Law Program. The program provides technical assistance to human rights organizations to advance the capacity to prevent violations, improve coordination of responses when abuses occur, and document incidents for potential use in international litigation.

“We’ve had a human rights project for over 30 years,” Wolfinbarger said. “Geospatial technology is a new way of looking at it.”

AAAS was among the first organizations to document the destruction of villages in Darfur, Sudan, for example, detecting ash rings that were left where villages or traditional round houses once stood, she said. In December 2010, actor George Clooney and human rights activist John Prendergast established the Satellite Sentinel Project to deter and document threats to civilian populations on both sides of the Sudan-South Sudan border. Prendergast is co-founder of The Enough Project, which seeks to end genocide and crimes against humanity.

The AAAS geospatial technology project made news again this August with a report showing a “nearly constant rate of damage” in Aleppo, Syria’s biggest city, over a 10-month period ending in May. The devastation included Aleppo’s Ancient City, a UNESCO World Heritage site. The documentation made possible by satellite images would otherwise have taken months to accomplish on the ground, and at great risk to monitors, Wolfinbarger said. AAAS undertook the Aleppo project independently at the request of the human rights organization Amnesty International, and presented initial findings at USIP in October.

A growing trove of publicly available imagery from commercial satellites “is an untapped resource for the study of border conflicts and territorial disputes,” AAAS said in its description of the USIP project.

“While each dispute is unique, border conflicts are often preceded by a period of escalating tensions,” according to AAAS. Observable effects “could form the basis for an effective conflict early-warning mechanism. “

In addition to Wolfinbarger, project staff members include a specialist in terrestrial remote sensing and a researcher on satellite imagery to track changes in urban environments. AAAS takes the precaution of not releasing images immediately in a fluid situation to avoid risks to vulnerable populations on the ground, Wolfinbarger said.

The USIP-funded study will take place over 18 months. The results will be made publicly available and distributed to relevant government, non-profit and United Nations agencies. AAAS will produce a case study report, an analysis handbook and a technical document that identifies best practices in the interpretation of high-resolution satellite imagery for border conflicts.

Viola Gienger is a senior writer at USIP.

Related Publications

Dissecting Sudan’s Coup

Dissecting Sudan’s Coup

Wednesday, October 27, 2021

By: Manal Taha;  Joseph Tucker

On October 25, Sudan’s military detained the country’s prime minister and key civilian leaders, dissolved the government and declared a state of emergency. The coup, which has put in doubt Sudan’s transition to democracy, quickly prompted protests in the streets of the capital Khartoum and other cities. Some protesters were killed after being fired on by security forces and calls for mass protests on October 30 are growing. USIP’s Joseph Tucker and Manal Taha analyze what the latest developments in Sudan mean for the country and consider the options for the United States to respond to this crisis.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & PreventionDemocracy & Governance

What Does Sudan’s New Cabinet Mean for its Transition?

What Does Sudan’s New Cabinet Mean for its Transition?

Monday, February 8, 2021

By: Joseph Tucker

The announcement on February 8 of a new Cabinet in Khartoum—the product of a peace accord signed by Sudan’s transitional government with several armed groups in October 2020 through a deal brokered by South Sudan—offers hope that the broader inclusion of political leaders can help address Sudan’s pressing challenges and create peace dividends. Unfortunately, the lengthy process of selecting new Cabinet members revealed additional fractures among both signatories to the peace deal and civilian political elements that seemingly offer competing visions for the transition and beyond.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance

How Art Helped Propel Sudan’s Revolution

How Art Helped Propel Sudan’s Revolution

Thursday, November 12, 2020

By: Elizabeth Murray

During Sudan’s 2019 revolution—as people mobilized across the country with tactics including sit-ins, marches, boycotts, and strikes—artists helped capture the country’s discontent and solidify protesters’ resolve. In particular, artists became an integral part of the months-long sit-in at the military headquarters in Khartoum, which was known as the heart of the revolution until it was violently dispersed by paramilitary forces on June 3, 2019. This immense expression of creativity was both a result of loosening restrictions on freedom of expression and, at the same time, a catalyst for further change.

Type: Blog

Nonviolent Action

View All Publications