USIP last month held a course for congressional staff entitled, “China, Pakistan and Nuclear Weapons: the Security Challenges for the United States.” The course was intended to provide context and background on both technical and policy issues related to nuclear nonproliferation.

November 19, 2012

USIP last month held a course for congressional staff entitled, “China, Pakistan and Nuclear Weapons: the Security Challenges for the United States.”  

From October 17-18, USIP’s Bruce MacDonald and Mike Lekson ran a shorter version of arms control/nonproliferation courses that USIP’s Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding has offered for the last few years. MacDonald and Lekson provided context and background on both technical and policy issues related to nuclear nonproliferation, while USIP’s Moeed Yusuf discussed topics specific to Pakistan and the Heritage Foundation’s Dean Cheng focused on China. 

“Nuclear weapons and the challenges they pose for U.S. security are going to be an important part of the congressional agenda for the foreseeable future, so we tried to help students understand both the incentives and disincentives for countries to seek nuclear capabilities and real world geopolitical and technical challenges in attaining such capabilities,” MacDonald said.

Staff from both houses of Congress and both parties participated in the course, which came about in response to interest on Capitol Hill in condensed versions of Academy courses. The course was scheduled during the October recess so that staffers could more easily attend the entire session.

Michael Walker, military legislative assistant to Louisiana Congressman Rodney Alexander, who was instrumental in encouraging and supporting the course on Capitol Hill, said “Learning about the context of the issues at hand is very important for congressional staff. I came away with a much better understanding of the topic and the regional dynamics – in this case, China and Pakistan.  Too often, we only see things from our nation’s vantage point. But, as the Academy instructors highlighted, we also need to be aware of the interests of other nations so that we can better advance our own policy goals and relationships.”

Regarding the structure of the Academy’s course, Lekson said, “We are strong believers in interactive learning, so we did a different simulation each day and, to help our participants stretch themselves a little, we assigned them roles in the Executive Branch as they dealt with two very plausible nuclear crisis scenarios.” 

Following the class, Walker noted, “The instructors did an exceptional job – and the course went over very well on the Hill.  We had hoped that six or seven people would participate, but about 30 people showed up.”   

Given the growing interest, the Academy hopes to be able to offer further courses for congressional staff on this and other relevant topics.  

“The opportunity to teach a course in the U.S. Capitol to congressional staff was a real honor for us. We are very interested in offering other courses on relevant topics for congressional staff, and will do our best to tailor the subject matter, course length and timing to meet their very busy schedules,” Lekson said.    


Related Research & Analysis

The 2022 Pelosi Visit to Taiwan: Assessing US-China Signaling and Action-Reaction Dynamics

The 2022 Pelosi Visit to Taiwan: Assessing US-China Signaling and Action-Reaction Dynamics

Monday, July 7, 2025

In recent years, the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have found it particularly challenging to interpret one another’s foreign policy signals. Misinterpretation of each other’s signaling may contribute to a bilateral action-reaction dynamic and can intensify into an action-reaction cycle and escalation spiral.

Type: Report

What’s at Stake for China in the Iran War?

What’s at Stake for China in the Iran War?

Monday, June 23, 2025

China has major energy and economic interests that are threatened by an escalating conflict. But Beijing may also see some strategic opportunities with the U.S. focused on the war. Ultimately, China is likely unwilling, and unable, to make a serious effort to broker peace.

Type: Analysis

The Element of Surprise: Space and Cyber Warfare in U.S.-China Rivalry

The Element of Surprise: Space and Cyber Warfare in U.S.-China Rivalry

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

The 2024 revelations over China’s effort to implant malware in critical U.S. infrastructure by the Volt Typhoon hacking group — as well as the Salt Typhoon group’s successful breaching of at least nine major U.S. telecoms — have renewed concern over Beijing’s constant, ongoing efforts to hack Western companies, governments and non-governmental organizations. Unlike past incidents, like those involving Chinese military unit 61398, which were largely about cyber espionage, the Volt Typhoon group was actively implanting malware designed to disrupt critical infrastructure such as water and power systems.

Type: Analysis

How Vulnerable Is India to Chinese Economic Coercion?

How Vulnerable Is India to Chinese Economic Coercion?

Monday, June 16, 2025

By: Sushant Singh

While India has taken a strong security stance against China, its economic posture has been cooperative. But India's reliance on Chinese imports may undermine its role as a counterbalance to China. The U.S. can help India serve as a counterweight to China by supporting Delhi’s de-risking efforts.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis