Dorina A. Bekoe, author of “Voting in Fear: Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa” and former USIP senior program officer, discusses her book’s new findings on elections and conflict in Africa and which countries are at risk for violence in the months ahead.

Reducing Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa

Dorina A. Bekoe, author of “Voting in Fear: Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa” and former USIP senior program officer, discusses her book’s new findings on elections and conflict in Africa and which countries are at risk for violence in the months ahead.  

Have some countries been able to successfully reduce electoral violence once it starts?

Yes, there are important examples from Ghana’s 2004 and 2008 pre-election preparations.

In 2004 and 2008, Ghana’s leading civil society organizations worked with international partners to train a subset of election observers to monitor electoral violence before the upcoming polls. In 2004, the Ghana Center for Democratic Development and the Institute for Policy Alternatives selected nine at-risk constituencies and in 2008 the Coalition of Domestic Election Observers (CODEO) selected 25 at-risk constituencies. In each case, the data obtained regarding rising tension and violent clashes were shared with relevant stakeholders – such as security services, the media, the national peace council, and other civil society organization – for the purposes of intervening strategically to defuse hostilities. In the more extensive 2008 exercise, the data show that these timely interventions helped to progressively reduce the number of violent incidents recorded before the elections.

In 2012, 65 constituencies have been identified for close monitoring by CODEO. As in the past, the aim is to intervene proactively to reduce the level of tension and resolve conflicts before they escalate into more serious incidents.

What are important questions that need to be answered with respect to electoral violence?

A stunning result from the data and the African Electoral Violence Dataset, compiled by Scott Straus and Charlie Taylor, is the failure of electoral violence to abate over time. Proponents of democracy would theorize that violence around elections should decrease as countries stayed democratic for longer periods of time. But, in fact, there seems to be little relationship between the two: electoral violence seems to persist as the same rate in 2008 (the last year in the dataset) that it did in 1990 (when many African countries adopted democratic reforms). Indeed, even in countries like Ghana, where most analysts feel comfortable asserting its progressive democratization, there is regular electoral violence.

This persistence of electoral violence is worrying. It warrants deeper understanding of the processes of democratization and institutional reforms and the incentives available to perpetrators for using violent versus peaceful strategies for winning or resolving election-related disputes. Of particular concern is the impunity enjoyed by many that commit or order electoral violence: how does this affect the calculus to use violence as a political strategy? How do existing grievances that otherwise lie dormant for years, suddenly transform into violent confrontations? The answers to these questions may begin to provide some insight to why electoral violence persists even amid progressively consolidating democracies.

What countries are at risk of electoral violence in the next several months?

In the near term, I would focus attention on Ghana, Kenya, and Togo:

In Ghana, while the level of electoral violence did not rise to threaten the state, there were still disturbing incidents of political candidates being assaulted and even killed, political supporters being harassed and the media unable to regulate inflammatory language. It all made for a very tense period. Similar patterns are being repeated today, as the country prepares for the 2012 general elections. Civil society, national peace institutions, electoral institutions, and nationally respected authority figures will be the key to ensuring peaceful polls.

Kenyans not only face unresolved grievances related to ethnicity and land, but also face a completely new electoral map and will be voting for six levels of government. Politicians are trying to position themselves in ways that increase their chances of winning, as evidenced by the constantly changing political alliances. So far, none of the perpetrators of violence in past elections have paid a price (though there has been an arrest in the recent clashes in Tana District), which increase the chances that politicians will see violence as a viable political strategy.

Togo’s legislative elections will also likely be violent. The political pact negotiated in the wake of the 2005 elections where at least 500 people lost their lives has fallen apart. The political opposition is more united in ousting President Faure Gnassingbe than it has ever been. They have been fearless in facing the Togolese security forces during their nearly weekly protests. If elections take place under circumstances than the opposition deems unfair, I would expect protests and violent clashes with security officers.

Explore Further

Related Publications

Walking a Fine Line: Holding Elections Amid Peace Processes

Walking a Fine Line: Holding Elections Amid Peace Processes

Tuesday, September 3, 2019

By: Jonas Claes

Elections that are organized amid a peace process can either destabilize or pacify a conflict. The vote can put significant pressure on a peace accord, as Colombia is experiencing today, or it can integrate formerly warring parties into the political process, as in Nepal’s 2008 Constituent Assembly elections. The timing of elections in relation to peace processes, as well as the inclusivity of the process itself, are critical in determining whether peace or conflict prevails at the polls.

Electoral Violence; Peace Processes

Iraq’s Democratic Imperative: Getting Provincial Elections Right

Iraq’s Democratic Imperative: Getting Provincial Elections Right

Monday, August 5, 2019

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed; Adam Gallagher

Iraq’s landmark 2018 national elections—the first since the military defeat of ISIS—presented an opportunity for a much-needed course correction for the country’s sclerotic political process. Unfortunately, that opportunity was not seized properly. The vote was marred by claims of widespread fraud, low voter turnout, a delayed results announcement and a protracted government formation process. Originally scheduled for the spring of 2017, Iraq’s parliament recently delayed provincial elections again, moving the date to early April 2020. The election delay will give Iraq’s institutions further time to do the important work necessary to get these elections right and, thus, get Iraq’s politics on the right track. But, it is urgent for this work—bolstered by support from the international community—to start now.

Democracy & Governance; Electoral Violence

Burma’s Big Test: Preventing Election Violence in 2020

Burma’s Big Test: Preventing Election Violence in 2020

Tuesday, July 2, 2019

By: Jonas Claes

The people of Burma will head to the polls in late 2020 to elect more than 1,100 representatives to national, state, and regional legislative bodies. During a recent field assessment, the U.S. Institute of Peace confirmed that the risk of election-related violence is surprisingly low considering the ongoing conflicts and multitude of grievances. However, hate speech, disinformation, and intense competition between parties could create violent incidents, particularly during the campaign period. Early efforts to promote peaceful elections need to start now as the window for effective prevention will soon be closed.

Electoral Violence

Exposure to Violence and Voting in Karachi, Pakistan

Exposure to Violence and Voting in Karachi, Pakistan

Wednesday, June 19, 2019

By: Mashail Malik ; Niloufer Siddiqui

Pakistan’s 2018 elections marked just the second time in history that power transferred peacefully from one civilian government to another after a full term in office. Although the initial months of campaigning were relatively free of violence, the two weeks before polling were dangerous for campaigners and voters alike, and the elections provided a platform for some parties to incite violence, particularly against Pakistan’s minority sects. This report provides a deep examination of how exposure to political violence in Pakistan’s largest city affects political behavior, including willingness to vote and faith in the democratic process.

Electoral Violence

View All Publications