Assessing the Oil Deal between the Two Sudans
Photo Courtesy of NY Times

Word that Sudan and South Sudan had reached a deal over oil transit fees over the past weekend may trigger a new round of negotiations over other contentious issues between the two countries. But, we’ll see. USIP’s Jon Temin gives us some perspective.

Sudan and South Sudan reached a deal recently over the fees South Sudan would pay to Sudan to move oil from the oil-rich South through Sudan to northern ports.

The agreement ends a contentious period in which both sides appeared to be far apart from each other about how to pay the fees, with South Sudan wanting to pay as little as $1 per barrel, and Sudan demanding as much as $36 per barrel. In January, South Sudan had shut down oil production, throwing the economies of both countries into peril and raising fears that the violence along the shared border could expand.

But after a visit from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the two emerged with a deal to get oil flowing again. USIP's Jon Temin answers a few questions about what transpired.

A crisis seems to have been averted after the two Sudans reached a deal on oil pipeline transit fees. What's the significance of this?

It's an important achievement in negotiations that have been ongoing for about two years. Oil is the lifeblood of both economies, and each is suffering tremendously since South Sudan shut down its oil production. But this is only one piece in a larger puzzle of negotiations following the secession of South Sudan. There remain a host of unresolved issues – many of which relate to oil – such as the location of the border between the two countries, the status of the disputed Abyei territory and accusations that each country supports rebel movements operating in the other's territory.

What role did the AU's Thabo Mbeki play in mediating a deal between the two countries over pipeline fees?

The African Union High-Level Implementation Panel, chaired by President Mbeki, has been at the heart of the negotiations since they began. The panel is an innovative creation by the AU, and the oil agreement is its most important achievement to date. The panel operates in a difficult and sensitive environment, and at various stages has had strained relations with Juba and Khartoum, but deserves credit for its persistence and for sealing this deal. | Read the full Q & A


Related Publications

The Latest @ USIP: Women’s Role in the South Sudan Peace Process

The Latest @ USIP: Women’s Role in the South Sudan Peace Process

Monday, January 9, 2023

When South Sudan achieved independence in 2011, many South Sudanese women hoped it would lead to improvements on gender and security issues. In the years since, recurring civil conflict has unfortunately delayed these aspirations — but as with the independence movement, women have been at the forefront of the country’s resurgent peace process. Rita Lopidia, executive director of the Eve Organization for Women Development and the 2020 recipient of USIP’s Women Building Peace Award, discusses how South Sudan’s national action plan on women, peace and security helped guide women’s involvement in the revitalized peace agreement as well as how her organization is working with both men and women on gender and peacebuilding issues.

Type: Blog

GenderPeace Processes

South Sudan’s people have spoken on peace. Is anyone listening?

South Sudan’s people have spoken on peace. Is anyone listening?

Friday, April 16, 2021

The United States played a key role in the emergence of South Sudan as an independent state 10 years ago. Yet today, U.S. policy toward the country is insufficient to address the continued violence or promote sustainable peace. Even so, it is not too late for U.S. policymakers to embark upon a renewed push for peace. To move forward, they should listen to what South Sudan’s people said in the recently concluded National Dialogue and incorporate its recommendations in diplomatic, humanitarian and development strategies for the country.

Type: Analysis

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria

Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria

Wednesday, April 14, 2021

South Sudan’s civil war expanded into Equatoria, the country’s southernmost region, in 2016, forcing hundreds of thousands to flee into neighboring Uganda in what has been called Africa’s largest refugee exodus since the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Equatoria is now the last major hot spot in the civil war. If lasting peace is to come to South Sudan, writes Alan Boswell, it will require a peace effort that more fully reckons with the long-held grievances of Equatorians.

Type: Special Report

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications