The recently adopted fiscal year 2011 federal budget includes $39.5 million in funding for the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) -- a 20 percent reduction from the fiscal year 2010 level of $49.2 million.

The recently adopted fiscal year 2011 federal budget includes $39.5 million in funding for the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) -- a 20 percent reduction from the fiscal year 2010 level of $49.2 million.

USIP President Richard H. Solomon said that the response to the nation’s “fiscal duress” will require cuts in the Institute’s work in the areas of international conflict prevention, mediation and post-conflict management operations; research, analysis and innovation in peacebuilding; and education and training for conflict managers.

The new budget requires the Institute to squeeze the cuts out of the remaining months of FY 2011, reducing by $10 million the amount available for global peacebuilding activities. Ongoing peace operations in Afghanistan and Iraq will not be immediately affected because they are funded through supplemental appropriations.

“No institution of government is unaffected by the nation’s financial condition, and we are doing our part to implement the necessary cuts with as little damage as possible to American interests and USIP’s work in the field,” Solomon said.

Solomon said that the Institute would remain able to assist in the nation’s management of a complex array of security challenges, including instability and change in the Middle East, post-conflict transitions and nuclear-armed rogue states.

Before the FY 2011 budget agreement, Solomon had instructed the Institute’s managers to identify ways of operating more efficiently, including a freeze on new staff positions, a reduction in the hiring of contractors and the consolidation of some activities. Those cost-saving steps should help reduce the impact of cuts in spending on USIP peacebuilding activities.

“Robust funding of international conflict prevention, management and resolution at this critical time makes a vital contribution to U.S. national security,” said Solomon. “Peacebuilding saves lives and saves money.”

Latest Publications

Huawei’s Expansion in Latin America and the Caribbean: Views from the Region

Huawei’s Expansion in Latin America and the Caribbean: Views from the Region

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

By: Parsifal D’Sola Alvarado

Since its founding in Shenzhen, China, in 1987, Huawei has grown into one of the world’s major information and communications technology companies, but its ties to China’s government and military have been regarded by US officials as a potential risk to national security. Latin American and Caribbean countries, however, have embraced the company for the economic and technological benefits it provides. This report explains the stark contrast between Huawei’s standing in the United States and its neighbors to the south.

Type: Special Report

Global Policy

The Indo-Pacific’s Newest Minilateral Emerges

The Indo-Pacific’s Newest Minilateral Emerges

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

By: Brian Harding;  Haroro Ingram

Last week, Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. stepped foot in the Oval Office for the second time in a year. Joining Marcos this time was Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, the leader of the United States’ most important ally in Asia and, arguably, the world. The Philippines has long been among a second rung of regional allies, so this first-ever trilateral summit marks Manila’s entrance as a leading U.S. ally working to maintain order and prevent Chinese revisionism in East Asia.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

What Sweden’s Accession Shows About NATO’s Future

What Sweden’s Accession Shows About NATO’s Future

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

By: A. Wess Mitchell, Ph.D.

As NATO celebrates its 75th anniversary, it has cause to celebrate Sweden’s addition as the 32nd member of the alliance. The Nordic country’s accession came after a grueling, two-year fight with NATO member states Turkey and Hungary, both of which extracted concessions in exchange for allowing the process to move forward. Sweden’s entry will improve NATO’s capabilities and greatly reduce the vulnerability of its northeastern flank. But the difficulties it took to reach this point raise serious questions about the alliance’s ability to cohere around shared political and strategic objectives in a time of crisis.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Iran’s Attack and the New Escalatory Cycle in the Middle East

Iran’s Attack and the New Escalatory Cycle in the Middle East

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

By: Robin Wright

The Middle East is entering a new phase after unprecedented attacks by Israel and Iran during the first two weeks of April. Robin Wright, a senior fellow at USIP and the Woodrow Wilson Center who has covered the region for a half century, explores what happened, the strategic implications, the political context and the divided world reaction.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications