On Wednesday, April 22, the Institute’s Education and Training Center/International (ETC/I) hosted a half-day demonstration of the Strategic Economic Needs and Security Exercise (SENSE) for members of the Institute staff and a handful of outside guests. SENSE is a computer-facilitated simulation that models the conditions of an imaginary country (“Akrona”) emerging from conflict.

Institute Staff Participates in SENSE Simulation

Players were assigned roles representing government officials, private firms, civil society, and international actors. They were given the opportunity to identify, coordinate, and integrate economic, social, political, and military policies to foster recovery and reconstruction. 

SENSE was initially developed by the Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA) to help implement the Dayton Accords. The simulation is used to strengthen capabilities of decision-makers to prevent conflict in fragile states and manage post-conflict transitions successfully. Working both online and in face-to-face role-playing, Institute staff participants were challenged to address the many hurdles facing Akrona in its post-conflict recovery: economic instability, a crumbling infrastructure, natural resource allocation, and health care crises, to name but a few.

SENSE has been successfully employed (by USIP and/or IDA) in overseas training programs with participants from Bosnia, Kosovo, Montenegro, Iraq, Poland, and Georgia. In 2005, USIP expanded the program to train Iraqis to run the simulation in Iraq for other Iraqis. The Institute also gave the Poles training to run SENSE simulations in 2006; since then, they have successfully trained local and regional players, reaching out as far as Afghanistan. This has helped leaders to better understand the complex negotiations necessary in a conflict environment. Despite the truncated nature of Wednesday’s program – a typical simulation would run three to five days – role players were uniformly impressed with both the message behind the medium and the medium itself. SENSE provides a powerful tool for teaching the hard choices facing every facet of a peacebuilding scenario.

In partnership with George Mason University and the Institute for Defense Analysis, ETC/I will be offering a full, three-day SENSE simulation on May 5-7 at the Dupont Hotel in Washington, D.C. For more information, please contact Jeffrey Krentel at jkrentel@usip.org or http://sense.eventbrite.com/.

 

View Photo Gallery

Related Research & Analysis

How Critical Mineral Partnerships Can Serve Both African and U.S. Interests

How Critical Mineral Partnerships Can Serve Both African and U.S. Interests

Thursday, February 27, 2025

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is looking for U.S. investors in the mining sector as a way to break China’s dominance over the country’s reserves of cobalt, copper and other critical minerals. However, the DRC’s struggles with violence and weak governance make this seem like a risky proposition — but it doesn’t have to be. USIP’s Thomas Sheehy, Gécamines’ Guy-Robert Lukama and USIP Senior Study Group on Critical Minerals in Africa member Anthony Carroll explain how the United States can build mutually beneficial partnerships with countries like the DRC that address, rather than worsen, regional instability and serve U.S. economic and security interests.

Type: Blog

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Friday, December 6, 2024

The weaponization of water resources is among the most devastating tools used in violent conflict. And while this tactic has been pervasive throughout history, it’s on the rise. State and non-state actors across the globe are increasingly exploiting the capture, control and outright destruction of water resources and related infrastructure to inflict indiscriminate human suffering and further their own strategic and military aims. To put this devastating trend into historical context: Out of all the recorded incidents targeting water infrastructure over the last 2,000 years, 41 percent have occurred since 2020.

Type: Analysis

A Delicate Balance: Promoting Nuclear Energy While Preventing Proliferation

A Delicate Balance: Promoting Nuclear Energy While Preventing Proliferation

Thursday, November 21, 2024

As global energy demands intensify and the urgency of addressing climate shocks mounts, the role of nuclear energy has come to the forefront of discussions for governments, businesses and those concerned about sustainable development. Just last week, the Biden administration released a plan to triple U.S. nuclear capacity by 2050. While nuclear energy promises efficiency gains and significant emissions reductions, public opinion remains divided about the tradeoffs of increased investment, the safety risks and the implications for international security. This puts the U.S. at a crossroads as it tries to navigate its role in a world with new demands for nuclear energy and heightened risks of conflict between nuclear-armed states. Such risks were highlighted this week when Russia lowered its nuclear threshold in response to new U.S. authorizations for Ukraine to use long-range weapons.

Type: Analysis

Why Early Warnings Are Critical for Climate Action and Conflict Prevention

Why Early Warnings Are Critical for Climate Action and Conflict Prevention

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Amid a changing climate, understanding the interplay between extreme environmental events and conflict is only growing more important. Droughts, floods and other natural disasters can exacerbate socioeconomic vulnerabilities, highlight weaknesses in governance, disrupt livelihoods and increase perceptions of marginalization.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis