Andrew Wilder and Moeed Yusuf assess the turnout and results of the first Pakistan election in which a civilian government recognized as democratically elected completed a full term and will hand over to another democratically elected civilian administration.

201305-14PAKISTAN_UNREST_1-event.jpg

In the wake of Pakistan’s general elections held on May 11, USIP experts comment on the vote’s high turnout and discuss the significance of the elections for Pakistan’s democratic future. It was the first Pakistan election in which a civilian government recognized as democratically elected completed a full term and will hand over to another democratically elected civilian administration.

Andrew Wilder, director of USIP’s Afghanistan and Pakistan programs, noted that the high rates of voter participation indicate the public is rejecting militant demands. He said:

“On May 11th approximately 50 million Pakistanis turned out to vote, braving threats of violent attacks by the Pakistani Taliban to stop voters from casting their ballots. The estimated 60 percent turnout rate has only been exceeded once before in Pakistan’s first democratic national elections in 1970, and this resounding rejection of the demands of militants not to vote strongly signals the strong preference of most Pakistanis for a democratic future.”

Watching the events in Pakistan, USIP South Asia Advisor Moeed Yusuf was encouraged by the high level of involvement despite violence in parts of the country during the run-up to election day:

“In what were easily the most unpredictable elections in Pakistan's history, the sense of excitement and involvement was just fantastic to watch. Democracy has been the real winner!”

Yusuf also commented on the results of the elections, which news reports say appear to give a majority to the Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) of former two-time Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. Yusuf said:

“The ranking of the parties was largely expected, but the margin of victory for PML-N was rather surprising. Overall, a good mix of results, which will force the main parties to work together.”

On May 14, USIP will hosted a public discussion, “Pakistan's 2013 Elections: Assessing the Results and Impacts.” The panel discussion featured Safiya Ghori-Ahmad from the Pakistan Desk at the U.S. Department of State; Arif Rafiq, adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute; and Moeed Yusuf and Andrew Wilder.


Related Publications

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Monday, February 12, 2024

Surprisingly, candidates aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan won the most seats in Pakistan’s elections. But while voters “have shown their faith in democracy,” the lack of a strong mandate for any specific leader or institution “doesn’t necessarily bode well for [Pakistan’s] stability,” says USIP’s Tamanna Salikuddin.

Type: Podcast

View All Publications