Pakistan and India are defying the global trend toward reduction in nuclear arsenals. This Peace Brief looks at several reasons for this prognosis.

43

Summary

  • Pakistan and India are defying the global trend toward reduction in nuclear arsenals.
  • Both countries are expanding their arsenals and are unlikely to jump on the disarmament bandwagon.
  • There are several reasons for this grim prognosis: both have active conflicts and recurring crises; Pakistan’s nuclear deterrent is tied to India’s conventional strength and thus it will not consider nuclear disarmament until New Delhi reduces its conventional arsenal; neither India, nor Pakistan will be comfortable with their nuclear strength in the near future; their official stances on global non-proliferation initiatives complicate matters; and the world has failed to do its bit to lure these two states to the non-proliferation regime.
  • Indian and Pakistani concerns about the current global non-proliferation protocols need to be addressed.
  • Equally important, efforts should be made to enhance strategic stability in South Asia; crisis prevention and crisis management protocols are critical in this regard.

About this Brief

The content of this Peace Brief benefitted from views expressed at two recent USIP public events on South Asian nuclear weapons. On April 14, 2010, USIP hosted a seminar on “Atomic Pakistan: Building a Nuclear Arsenal in a Disarming World” that specifically debated Pakistan’s nuclear weapons strategy and its position on ‘Global Zero.’ The second event, “South Asia in the Age of Nuclear Weapons and Space Security,” focused on the South Asian nuclear, missile and space rivalry and was held on May 11, 2010.

Moeed W. Yusuf is the South Asia adviser at USIP’s Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention and is responsible for managing the Institute’s Pakistan program. Ashley Pandya is a program assistant with the Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention.


Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

View All Publications