On July 10, 1997, the United States Institute of Peace hosted the fourth and final meeting of its Working Group on Dayton Implementation. The Institute organized these meetings to support peace implementation in the Federation and Republika Srpska (RS).   Participants at the July 10 meeting discussed the issue of war crimes, focusing not only on arrests, but also on identifying ways to strengthen and reinforce the work of the International War Crimes Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY) so that prosecutions are swift and judicious.

 

About This Report

On July 10, 1997, the United States Institute of Peace hosted the fourth and final meeting of its Working Group on Dayton Implementation. The Institute organized these meetings to support peace implementation in the Federation and Republika Srpska (RS) and to fulfill its mandate from Congress to develop creative options for addressing international conflicts. Participants at the July 10 meeting discussed the issue of war crimes, focusing not only on arrests, but also on identifying ways to strengthen and reinforce the work of the International War Crimes Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY) so that prosecutions are swift and judicious. Working group members also discussed the need to support and establish local systems of justice so that those responsible for genocidal acts are held accountable, thereby implicitly exonerating citizens who have refrained from acts of violence and terror. Participants agreed that war victims, regardless of ethnic affiliation, must have access to fair hearings and due process, if any measure of reconciliation is to occur for this country. Ambassador John Menzies, former Ambassador to Bosnia-Herzegovina and currently a Senior Fellow at the Institute, chaired this and other working group sessions. Participants include officials from the Department of State, the Department of Defense and other federal agencies, as well as nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives and scholars. The opinions and recommendations of the working group on war crimes were summarized by program officer Lauren Van Metre.

The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Institute of Peace, which does not advocate specific policies.


Related Publications

Security and Justice in Post-Revolution Libya

Security and Justice in Post-Revolution Libya

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Three years after the death of Muammar Qaddafi and the end of the revolution in Libya, security and justice are stalled and elusive despite the proliferation of security providers. The power of the gun prevails over the rule of law. Many see no end in sight. Based on a nationwide survey and drawn from interviews and focus group sessions, this report—supported by the USIP and the Small Arms Survey—tracks security and justice in Libya from before the revolution through today, its realities, and...

Type: Peaceworks

Justice in Transition in Yemen

Justice in Transition in Yemen

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

This research is part of a three-year United States Institute of Peace (USIP) project that explores how Yemen’s rule of law and local justice and security issues have been affected in the post-Arab Spring transition period. A complement to other analytical and thematic pieces, this large-scale mapping provides data on factors influencing justice provision in half of Yemen’s governorates. Its goal is to support more responsive programming and justice sector reform. Field research was managed b...

Type: Peaceworks

Civil Defense Groups

Civil Defense Groups

Thursday, July 31, 2014

More than three hundred defense groups provide security to local communities in states around the world. While it is true that such groups can be a resource-efficient means for states to provide law and order to their communities, it is also true that they can worsen security.

Type: Special Report

Women's Access to Justice in Afghanistan

Women's Access to Justice in Afghanistan

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Since the fall of the Taliban in 2002, gains in women’s rights and access to justice in Afghanistan have been remarkable, yet women’s rights remain extremely limited. How do women in Afghanistan seek justice when their rights are violated? What barriers do they face in pursuing justice or receiving a fair outcome? This report draws on interviews and focus group discussions held in Afghanistan in 2011 and 2012 to determine answers to these and related questions and to recommend ways forward. ...

Type: Peaceworks

Gender

View All Publications