Since the internal armed conflict in Guatemala ended in 1996, millions of dollars have been spent on transitional justice, but the state's efforts to create an effective justice system have largely failed -- obliging many Guatemalans to create their own coping mechanisms for war-time atrocities, and severely limiting the effectiveness of ongoing transitional justice efforts.

Since the internal armed conflict in Guatemala ended in 1996, millions of dollars have been spent on transitional justice, but the state's efforts to create an effective justice system have largely failed -- obliging many Guatemalans to create their own coping mechanisms for war-time atrocities, and severely limiting the effectiveness of ongoing transitional justice efforts.

Please join Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow Tani Adams to discuss findings from her fellowship project exploring how five communities in Guatemala are reconstructing community and social relations since the war ended.

The study sheds new light on what it means to be a "citizen" in a post-war democracy dominated by impunity, and the challenges of constructing democracy in post-war societies permeated by organized crime.  Panelists will discuss broader questions about the effectiveness of prevailing transitional justice and democratization strategies, as well as the complex relations between international agencies, post-war states, and civil society.

Adams is completing tenure as a Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace, and will continue the research as a Public Policy fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.  This research is part of a larger ongoing study: Advances and Challenges in the Reconciliation Process in Post-War Guatemala, led by Adams at the Instituto Internacional de Aprendizaje para la Reconciliacion Social in Guatemala City, which she co-founded in late 2007.

Speakers

Tani Adams, 2008-2009 Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow, U.S. Institute of Peace

Mark Schneider, Senior Vice President and Special Adviser on Latin America, International Crisis Group

Mary Hope Schwoebel, Program Officer, Education and Training Center/International, U.S. Institute of Peace

David Tolbert, 2008-2009 Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow, U.S. Institute of Peace

Elizabeth "Lili" Cole, Moderator, Senior Program Officer, Grants and Fellowships, U.S. Institute of Peace

 

 

 

 

 

Related Publications

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Five Lessons from Guatemala’s 2023 Election

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Five Lessons from Guatemala’s 2023 Election

Thursday, April 25, 2024

When Bernardo Arévalo won the presidency last year, it left Guatemala’s corrupt old guard reeling. Arévalo and his anti-corruption Semilla Movement posed a direct threat to the power of Guatemala’s “pacto de los corruptos” — an alliance of government officials, politicians, prosecutors, judges, party financiers, state contractors and some wealthy families. The pact mobilized to overturn the election results. But Guatemala’s civil society, backed by U.S. and broader international support, was able to uphold the elections and advance democracy in the Central American nation.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Elections & Conflict

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Guatemala's Kleptocracy Fights Back

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Guatemala's Kleptocracy Fights Back

Thursday, April 18, 2024

Last year was a pivotal moment for Guatemala’s democracy. Longshot candidate Bernardo Arévalo rode popular anti-corruption fervor into a shocking second place finish in the first-round presidential polls, ultimately winning the presidency in the runoff. Since Guatemala transitioned to a democracy in the mid-1980s, the country has been wracked by increasingly pervasive corruption, perpetrated and perpetuated by venal elites.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Elections & Conflict

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Guatemala’s Shocking 2023 Election

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Guatemala’s Shocking 2023 Election

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

Guatemala’s 2023 elections were a turning point for the country. Despite a playing field tilted to favor the governing elite, voters elected Bernardo Arévalo, whose Semilla (“Seed”) Movement promised to break the country’s cycles of corruption, restoring democracy and the rule of law. Success was — and remains — far from inevitable. The kleptocracy pushed back hard, using their control of the public prosecutors’ office to open spurious investigations and pursue unsupported claims of electoral fraud.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Elections & Conflict

View All Publications