One way the Communist Party of China seeks to increase the uptake of its norms, values, and institutional practices in Africa is by providing professional education and training opportunities to African military officers. In addition to promoting China’s governance models, these programs have graduates in top leadership positions across the continent, including presidencies and numerous top defense roles. This report urges US and Western policymakers to counter this influence by providing more opportunities for African officers to train in Western military institutions.

President Xi Jinping welcomes President Filipe Jacinto Nyusi of Mozambique to Beijing on May 18, 2016. (Photo by Mark Schiefelbein/AP)
President Xi Jinping welcomes President Filipe Jacinto Nyusi of Mozambique to Beijing on May 18, 2016. (Photo by Mark Schiefelbein/AP)

Summary

  • The role of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in accomplishing Beijing’s political and ideological goals is called “military political work.” A subset of such work is China’s version of professional military education (PME).
  • China’s PME treats the education and training of foreign military personnel as an opportunity to promote China’s governance model to develop closer relationships with foreign militaries and governments and to build a shared understanding of security. 
  • Each year, thousands of African officers from many different countries attend training programs in China and participate in dialogues and exchanges with their Chinese counterparts. Many alumni of these programs go on to play leading roles in their countries’ militaries and governments.
  • Chinese PME is embedded within a larger framework designed to generate political support through party-to-party work, assistance in building infrastructure, and multifaceted soft power campaigns.
  • US policymakers should respond to China’s effective use of PME by expanding opportunities for African officers and making PME part of its own package of targeted human resource development.

About the Report

This report offers a policy-oriented analysis of the evolution of China’s provision of professional military education to African officers. It draws on historical and contemporary records and feedback from African officers, the latter including interviews conducted for this report with 20 African officers.  It was commissioned by the United States Institute of Peace’s Asia Center.

About the Author

Paul Nantulya is a research associate at the Africa Center for Strategic Studies in Washington, DC, where he also works on the People’s Liberation Army and China’s security strategy in Africa. He has published extensively on these subjects, including articles and commentaries for the US Army War College, the National Bureau for Asian Research, and the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Public Policy.
 


Related Publications

Dean Cheng on China’s New Military Force

Dean Cheng on China’s New Military Force

Tuesday, May 7, 2024

China’s military structure is not prone to change. But in a shocking move, Chinese leader Xi Jinping recently established a new military entity focused on “information dominance” in future wars, with many observers “left wondering what this is going to mean and why they did it,” says USIP’s Dean Cheng.

Type: Podcast

Blinken’s China Trip Shows Both Sides Want to Stabilize Ties

Blinken’s China Trip Shows Both Sides Want to Stabilize Ties

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken traveled to China last week as part of a series of recent high-level contacts between Washington and Beijing. Although no major breakthroughs came out of the trip, it demonstrates that both sides want to prevent bilateral ties from sinking any lower, even as U.S.-China competition continues to intensify.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) marks a new phase in Beijing’s ongoing push to change the international security order. Through the GSI, China seeks to establish itself as a counterbalance to U.S. influence and to reshape security management in a number of strategically important regions. The GSI is still in the early stages of implementation, but it has already demonstrated the potential to disrupt the existing security framework in Southeast Asia. This may lead to increased polarization within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), with some member states aligning with the GSI and others remaining cautious due to their stronger affiliations with the United States.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications