South Sudan’s civil war expanded into Equatoria, the country’s southernmost region, in 2016, forcing hundreds of thousands to flee into neighboring Uganda in what has been called Africa’s largest refugee exodus since the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Equatoria is now the last major hot spot in the civil war. If lasting peace is to come to South Sudan, writes Alan Boswell, it will require a peace effort that more fully reckons with the long-held grievances of Equatorians.

Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Andrew Medichini/AP)
Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Andrew Medichini/AP)

Summary

  • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expanded explosively into the country’s southern region, Equatoria, triggering a major refugee crisis. Even after the 2018 peace deal, parts of Equatoria continue to be active hot spots for national conflict.
  • The war in Equatoria does not fit neatly into the simplified narratives of South Sudan’s war as a power struggle for the center; nor will it be addressed by peacebuilding strategies built off those precepts. Most Equatorians—a collection of diverse minority ethnic groups—are fighting for more autonomy, local or regional, and a remedy to what is perceived as (primarily) Dinka hegemony.
  • Equatorian elites lack the external support to viably pursue their objectives through violence. The government in Juba, meanwhile, lacks the capacity and local legitimacy to definitively stamp out the rebellion. Both sides should pursue a negotiated settlement situated within South Sudan’s transitional period.
  • On a national level, conflict resolution should pursue shared sovereignty among South Sudan’s constituencies and regions, beyond power sharing among elites. To resolve underlying grievances, the political process should be expanded to include consultations with local community leaders. The constitutional reform process of South Sudan’s current transitional period therefore deserves special focus.

About the Report

This report examines the ongoing conflict in the Equatoria region of South Sudan and delineates the key actors and interests that will need to be accommodated in any attempt to resolve the crisis. Based on field research and interviews conducted in Equatoria and neighboring Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Kenya from 2016 to 2020, the report was sponsored by the Africa Center at the United States Institute of Peace.

About the Author

Alan Boswell is the senior analyst for South Sudan at the International Crisis Group and hosts The Horn podcast. Before that he covered South Sudan’s independence as a journalist and then served as a formal adviser to, or researcher at, the United Nations, USAID, the European Institute of Peace, the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, the World Peace Foundation, the United States Institute of Peace, and others. 

Related Publications

The Latest @ USIP: Women’s Role in the South Sudan Peace Process

The Latest @ USIP: Women’s Role in the South Sudan Peace Process

Monday, January 9, 2023

By: Rita Lopidia

When South Sudan achieved independence in 2011, many South Sudanese women hoped it would lead to improvements on gender and security issues. In the years since, recurring civil conflict has unfortunately delayed these aspirations — but as with the independence movement, women have been at the forefront of the country’s resurgent peace process. Rita Lopidia, executive director of the Eve Organization for Women Development and the 2020 recipient of USIP’s Women Building Peace Award, discusses how South Sudan’s national action plan on women, peace and security helped guide women’s involvement in the revitalized peace agreement as well as how her organization is working with both men and women on gender and peacebuilding issues.

Type: Blog

GenderPeace Processes

South Sudan’s people have spoken on peace. Is anyone listening?

South Sudan’s people have spoken on peace. Is anyone listening?

Friday, April 16, 2021

By: Ola Mohajer;  David Deng

The United States played a key role in the emergence of South Sudan as an independent state 10 years ago. Yet today, U.S. policy toward the country is insufficient to address the continued violence or promote sustainable peace. Even so, it is not too late for U.S. policymakers to embark upon a renewed push for peace. To move forward, they should listen to what South Sudan’s people said in the recently concluded National Dialogue and incorporate its recommendations in diplomatic, humanitarian and development strategies for the country.

Type: Analysis

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

The South Sudan Peace Process Archive: A Window into Mediation

The South Sudan Peace Process Archive: A Window into Mediation

Monday, March 29, 2021

By: Zach Vertin;  Aly Verjee

As part of its commitment to learning from peace processes, the U.S. Institute of Peace is pleased to launch the South Sudan Peace Process Archive, which aims to provide South Sudanese citizens, mediators, policymakers, academics and other interested readers a window into the 2013-2015 negotiations that attempted to end the conflict that began in South Sudan in late 2013. Documents for this archive were first assembled and organized in 2016. Now, archive curators and former peace process advisers Zach Vertin and Aly Verjee discuss their motivations for assembling and organizing the documents and what they hope the archive can contribute to future peace processes.

Type: Analysis

Mediation, Negotiation & DialoguePeace Processes

View All Publications