Trashing Social Divides in Pakistan
Photo by Farhat Abbas

I wanted to get off the phone as soon as possible when Zar Aunty told me she started an environmentalist organization, called The Environmental Protection Foundation, to get kids to pick up trash and plant trees in Lahore. "Zar Aunty, we are interested in peace and tolerance. I'm not sure how this fits."

Since returning to Pakistan three months ago, I've discovered the most interesting links between social activism and peace in Pakistan. Pakistanis in every sector are leveraging their skills, energy, and resources to create positive social change across the country. But some of the most relevant work is the least obvious.

Street sweeping, it turns out, has traditionally been the job of Christians in Lahore. Street sweepers, or chuhras, were almost all once Hindu "untouchables" who converted to Christianity in the late 19th century to escape the oppressive caste system. But since the creation of Pakistan, notions of the "uncleanliness" of minorities have ensured that the job of street sweeping would be reserved for non-Muslims. Government hiring ads sometimes state that street sweepers must be non-Muslims or specify that they must be Christian. Blasphemy cases have actually started with a Christian using and thereby "polluting" drinking water (as in the case of Asia Bibi, the Pakistani Christian woman convicted of blasphemy ) or cooking oil that was to be used by Muslims.

Colorful litter has become part of the landscape in Pakistan. Cities, villages, pristine valleys, historic sites – litter is everywhere. And Christians are not the only ones cleaning up Pakistan's streets. Trash-picking has become the job for the poorest of the poor – often the children of Afghan refugees who cannot work legally in Pakistan.  In this way, the most marginalized of Pakistan's population clean up after everyone else who litters liberally.

Pakistan has been branded internationally for terrorism, extremism, and instability, but most outside observers are oblivious to the class divisions that underlie Pakistan's quandary. Pakistan has a lot of problems, but they do not bother everyone equally. Pakistan's upper classes prove that almost any social problem can be solved with money or power. No electricity? Get a generator. No quality public education? Go to an elite private school.  No clean water? Buy bottled. No security? Hire private armed guards.

The socio-economic system becomes one of entitlement and impunity at the top, and disenfranchisement for the rest. Those at the top can circumvent the symptoms of state failure, and therefore have little incentive to compromise their comfort to address mass social problems that can be rendered invisible. The state is also biased in its provision of public resources. Electricity cuts are less frequent in elite neighborhoods and the capital, Islamabad. Meanwhile, slums, villages, and Christian areas hardly ever have electricity. The police are disproportionately deployed to elite areas. As a result, scarce resources, public goods, and human rights are reserved for those who can afford them, or who society and the state deem deserving.  People are willing to do anything to get a piece of the "pie" – lie, kill, cheat, smuggle, terrorize – except work together to make it bigger.

Pakistanis give enormous amounts in charity and volunteer time, but there is little cognizance of how individual, daily decisions shape shared space or undermine collective goals. Unless Pakistanis work together and adopt more socially conscious habits, no amount of international assistance or pressure on the government of Pakistan can save the country.

By asking rich and poor children to work together to clean up the streets, neglected neighborhoods, and even Hindu temples, The Environmental Protection Foundation sends a strong message to the next generation: Pakistan's problems are everyone's problems. Everyone must shed their biases to work together for the collective good. For most young, upper class Pakistanis, it may be the first time they encounter a contemporary of a lower class, not as a servant, but as an equal citizen with similar thoughts, feelings, and rights – including the same right to a clean, functioning state, and same capabilities to make it happen.

Treaties may be signed in fancy hotels, but peace will not come to Pakistan at the Serena. It will come when Pakistanis decide to take responsibility for the collective mess they have created, and pick up the trash.

Nadia Naviwala is the country representative for the U.S. Institute of Peace. Her family is from Karachi, Pakistan. 


Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

View All Publications