Economic Drivers in Fragile States Need More Attention in 2013, USIP Expert Says
Photo courtesy of NY Times

Failed economic overhauls, neglected small businesses and aid bureaucracies growing faster than their economies -- these are among the challenges this year after “modest gains” toward international goals for aid effectiveness in 2012, according to USIP expert Raymond Gilpin. Five key issues need to be addressed going forward in wielding economic tools effectively for advancing peace in countries facing violent conflict.

Gilpin, the director of USIP’s Sustainable Economies Center of Innovation, says there’s a “substantial” unfinished agenda as set out in the “New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States.” The plan was unveiled at the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness on 30 November 2011 in Busan, South Korea, which was held to follow up on the 2005 Paris Declaration calling for increased efforts to ensure the massive sums spent each year in development assistance produces substantial results. A report for the Busan conference called progress since 2005 “sobering,” with only one of 13 targets for 2010 having been met. On economic aid, not much has changed since then, Gilpin says.

“Much more needs to be done in 2013 to improve our knowledge of the peace-economics nexus and to use economic levers to promote peace,” Gilpin writes.  In particular, he emphasizes steps such as reorienting economic fundamentals in societies affected by war, leveraging the business sector’s self-interest in economic progress and “unlocking entrepreneurship” by including local businesses.

“Foreign assistance should build economies, not bureaucracies,” he says. “Foreign assistance could be re-directed to focus a lot more on building viable ecosystems within which private enterprise could flourish.”

And to figure out what works and why, more needs to be done to measure the impact of economic reform approaches in countries affected by conflict.

Gilpin points to initiatives from previous years that could provide guidance from organizations including USIP, Mercy Corps, the Center for Global Development and Kay-Tek. In case you missed it, check out his full blog post at USIP’s International Network for Economics and Conflict.

And tell us what ideas you know of that could help accelerate progress through economics?


Related Research & Analysis

How Critical Mineral Partnerships Can Serve Both African and U.S. Interests

How Critical Mineral Partnerships Can Serve Both African and U.S. Interests

Thursday, February 27, 2025

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is looking for U.S. investors in the mining sector as a way to break China’s dominance over the country’s reserves of cobalt, copper and other critical minerals. However, the DRC’s struggles with violence and weak governance make this seem like a risky proposition — but it doesn’t have to be. USIP’s Thomas Sheehy, Gécamines’ Guy-Robert Lukama and USIP Senior Study Group on Critical Minerals in Africa member Anthony Carroll explain how the United States can build mutually beneficial partnerships with countries like the DRC that address, rather than worsen, regional instability and serve U.S. economic and security interests.

Type: Blog

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Protecting Water Infrastructure During War

Friday, December 6, 2024

The weaponization of water resources is among the most devastating tools used in violent conflict. And while this tactic has been pervasive throughout history, it’s on the rise. State and non-state actors across the globe are increasingly exploiting the capture, control and outright destruction of water resources and related infrastructure to inflict indiscriminate human suffering and further their own strategic and military aims. To put this devastating trend into historical context: Out of all the recorded incidents targeting water infrastructure over the last 2,000 years, 41 percent have occurred since 2020.

Type: Analysis

A Delicate Balance: Promoting Nuclear Energy While Preventing Proliferation

A Delicate Balance: Promoting Nuclear Energy While Preventing Proliferation

Thursday, November 21, 2024

As global energy demands intensify and the urgency of addressing climate shocks mounts, the role of nuclear energy has come to the forefront of discussions for governments, businesses and those concerned about sustainable development. Just last week, the Biden administration released a plan to triple U.S. nuclear capacity by 2050. While nuclear energy promises efficiency gains and significant emissions reductions, public opinion remains divided about the tradeoffs of increased investment, the safety risks and the implications for international security. This puts the U.S. at a crossroads as it tries to navigate its role in a world with new demands for nuclear energy and heightened risks of conflict between nuclear-armed states. Such risks were highlighted this week when Russia lowered its nuclear threshold in response to new U.S. authorizations for Ukraine to use long-range weapons.

Type: Analysis

Why Early Warnings Are Critical for Climate Action and Conflict Prevention

Why Early Warnings Are Critical for Climate Action and Conflict Prevention

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Amid a changing climate, understanding the interplay between extreme environmental events and conflict is only growing more important. Droughts, floods and other natural disasters can exacerbate socioeconomic vulnerabilities, highlight weaknesses in governance, disrupt livelihoods and increase perceptions of marginalization.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis