Pakistan has struggled with Islamic militancy since the rise of the mujahideen in the 1980s. In the late 2000s, the Pakistan Army began establishing rehabilitation centers in the Swat Valley in an effort to deradicalize former Taliban fighters and other militants and reintegrate them into their communities. This report contrasts Pakistan’s deradicalization approach with the community-based program used in Denmark and the widely different prison-based program used in Saudi Arabia, and identifies areas in which the army’s approach could benefit from more extensive partnering with civilian-based organizations.

Men learn to use computers in a classroom at Pakistan’s Mishal Deradicalization and Emancipation Program in April 2012. (Mian Khursheed/Reuters)
Men learn to use computers in a classroom at Pakistan’s Mishal Deradicalization and Emancipation Program in April 2012. (Mian Khursheed/Reuters)
  • Based on the evidence, the success of deradicalization and rehabilitation programs depends on the voluntary participation of individuals and the early identification of the primary and secondary factors that contributed to their participation in militancy.
  • Worldwide, most programs focus on young men who show sympathy or peripheral support for militant groups, as they are considered to be at a phase where ideological refutation and disengagement is possible.
  • Pakistan’s program has borrowed heavily from Saudi Arabia’s deradicalization model, but has also strived to adopt a more comprehensive approach toward understanding the root causes of radicalization.
  • The Pakistan Army leads most deradicalization programming efforts in the country. The process of deradicalization and reintegration is costly and intensive, and the military’s intelligence and investigation abilities exceed those of other potential actors in this space.
  • Civil society organizations (CSOs) in Pakistan can and should be most active in the reintegration phase. Besides working with individuals, CSOs are integral in building resilience and trust in a wider community and ensuring a preventive approach toward further radicalization.
  • Given the number of potential red flags pertaining to human rights violations, any deradicalization project should follow the best practices of an established international body to ensure transparency and coordination.

About the Report

Based on fieldwork conducted in Pakistan, this report explores the Pakistan Army’s approach to deradicalization programming. The research discusses lessons learned from Pakistan’s experience with deradicalization programming and formulates a set of recommendations based on international best practices. The research was supported by a grant from the Asia Center at the United States Institute of Peace.

About the Author

Arsla Jawaid is a research fellow at Concord Consulting, where she specializes in understanding militancy and violent extremism. She previously served as a senior political officer on counter extremism for the British High Commission Islamabad. She has also consulted for USIP on youth radicalization in Pakistan and has worked with the UN Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate and the International Peace Institute on issues of prevention, militancy, and international security.

Related Publications

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

By: Christopher Clary

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

By: Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;  Tamanna Salikuddin

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Monday, February 12, 2024

By: Tamanna Salikuddin

Surprisingly, candidates aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan won the most seats in Pakistan’s elections. But while voters “have shown their faith in democracy,” the lack of a strong mandate for any specific leader or institution “doesn’t necessarily bode well for [Pakistan’s] stability,” says USIP’s Tamanna Salikuddin.

Type: Podcast

The 2021 India-Pakistan Ceasefire: Origins, Prospects, and Lessons Learned

The 2021 India-Pakistan Ceasefire: Origins, Prospects, and Lessons Learned

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

By: Christopher Clary

The February 2021 ceasefire between India and Pakistan along the Line of Control in Kashmir has—despite occasional violations—turned into one of the longest-lasting in the countries’ 75-year shared history. Yet, as Christopher Clary writes, the ceasefire remains vulnerable to shocks from terrorist attacks, changes in leadership, and shifting regional relations. With the ceasefire approaching its third anniversary, Clary’s report examines the factors that have allowed it to succeed, signs that it may be fraying, and steps that can be taken to sustain it.

Type: Special Report

Peace Processes

View All Publications