On one of the busiest intersections of Tunisia’s coastal city of Monastir stands a prominent building draped in red-and-white banners urging citizens to vote. Miniature Tunisian flags hang over the pillared entrance. Like similar buildings all over the country, the structure has been converted from a political party hub of the former dictator to a regional election-information center. The hive of activity inside during the run-up to Tunisia’s October parliamentary election and the coming presidential vote this month represents the kind of civic engagement that might get Tunisians through the rough spots in the next stage of its democratic emergence.

The Tunisian Independent High Authority for Elections (ISIE) and regional centers such as the one in Monastir emerged from Tunisia’s national dialogue process that successfully cemented agreement among the country’s main political parties on a constitution and related democratic processes. The authority is tasked with every aspect of election procedures, including registering and educating voters, registering candidates, managing campaign policies, and training thousands of volunteers and staff to manage polling centers on election day.  With the purpose of educating citizens about democracy and ensuring their access to the process, the centers have become vital in upholding a commitment to transparency, participation and public consultation.

Tunisia’s parliamentary elections last month were declared largely successful and marked  an end to the transitional period of the Arab Spring and a deepening of the country’s democratic processes.

Political party delegations and Tunisian observers monitored adherence to strict electoral procedures. Within two hours after polling stations closed nationwide, the two major political parties, the moderate Islamist Ennahda and the secular Nida Tounes, released official statements accepting the results and declaring the process free and fair. It was a defining moment for Tunisian political leaders, who had vowed a commitment to the democratic process and the decisions of the Tunisian people.

With preliminary results released just three days after the election, Nida Tounes secured 85 seats compared with Ennahda’s 67, and multiple smaller parties captured the remainder of the parliament’s 217 seats. Despite a severe drop in overall voter turnout, from 62 percent in 2011 to 52 percent this time, and an alarmingly low showing among youth, the process was deemed free and fair by domestic and international observers alike.

The next stage will involve jockeying for a coalition government, since no party won a majority of seats, and that process will await the results of presidential balloting scheduled for Nov. 23.

Personal liberties vs. personal responsibility

To understand the significance of this moment in Tunisia’s history, it is important to measure the commitment to service evidenced in the execution of these elections compared with the early days of the revolution. In the immediate aftermath of the largely peaceful toppling of the regime of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, many Tunisians focused mostly on their newfound personal liberties and their individual wants and needs.

It was a culture of protest, with young people demonstrating over every issue on which they didn’t fully agree, and even exercising their newfound freedoms in the most basic ways, like disobeying traffic laws when driving. Newspapers and radio and television stations, too, proliferated without any particular commitment to honest and open reporting and public service.

The latest parliamentary elections marked a dramatic shift to what appears to be a much clearer understanding of the responsibilities of citizenship in a democracy. While some disillusioned youth stayed away from the ballot box, the signs of civic engagement were evident in the youthful faces of polling center staff and the domestic observers, who all devoted nearly 24 hours straight to ensuring a successful election. It was apparent in the throngs of young volunteers welcoming visitors at the regional election-information centers and those participating in the final political party rallies.

At one polling location in Monastir, the head of the stations spent nearly a full minute scrutinizing each of the nearly 400 ballots cast throughout the day, confirming each in consultation with four other young workers and two equally youthful political party delegates. They were deliberative and clearly dedicated to validating every single legitimate vote.

Such centers now exist in every governorate in Tunisia, transforming the historical legacy of these spaces and representing the state’s commitment to its citizens in a democracy. 

Certainly challenges remain for the newly forming coalition government that will be led by Nida Tounes, including the need to re-engage marginalized youth, implement sweeping economic and security reforms, and tackle rising unemployment. The transparent, participatory and publicly consultative structures created through the election authority’s regional centers will be vital to ensuring this democratic foundation does not falter in the difficult years ahead.

Joyce Kasee is a program officer at USIP. She observed the parliamentary election in Tunisia as part of a delegation organized by the Carter Center in Atlanta, Georgia.

Related Publications

Tunisia: Democratic but Precarious

Tunisia: Democratic but Precarious

Friday, December 22, 2017

By: James Rupert

Amid central Tunisia’s dry farmlands, the city of Sidi Bouzid bustled one recent day under warm autumn sunshine. Street vendors and shoppers jostled under the roof of a new, open-air market, selling and buying produce or cheap clothes. Seven years after an impoverished street vendor in this city immolated himself and ignited the Arab Spring revolutions, his homeland has achieved a precarious stability. By many measures the Arab world’s only democracy, Tunisia remains hobbled by corruption, unemployment and violent extremism.

Democracy & Governance; Violent Extremism

Justice and Security Dialogues in  the Sahel and Maghreb

Justice and Security Dialogues in the Sahel and Maghreb

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

When violent conflict erupts, its roots often must be found and healed at the community level. Amid such turmoil, however, government officials, police, and community leaders are likely to mistrust each other—a breakdown in relations that opens space for security threats, including violent extremism and organized crime.

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

The Current Situation in Tunisia

The Current Situation in Tunisia

Friday, October 13, 2017

The sole fledgling democracy to arise from the Arab Spring represents an encouraging yet incomplete victory against authoritarian rule and violent extremism. Tunisia’s sustained progress since the revolution that toppled its dictatorial regime in 2011 is key to developing a strong democratic U.S. partner in this volatile region and countering radicalization and terrorism around the world. Yet economic stagnation, unemployment, political disaffection in poorer regions, and the inherent difficulties of a major political and social transition continue to threaten the country’s stability

Tunisian Student Unions Bridge Islamist, Secular Divide

Tunisian Student Unions Bridge Islamist, Secular Divide

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

By: Fred Strasser

The dividing line between the young Tunisians was evident as they gathered to attempt a dialogue between their university’s two rival student unions, groups tied to the country’s main political parties. On the right side of the room sat the Islamists, whose politics are closely bound to their religion. On the left were the secularists, adherents of an array of left-leaning ideologies.

Violent Extremism; Religion; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Democracy & Governance

View All Publications