How is it possible to do community policing in the absence of trust between citizens and security forces? This is just one of the questions that challenged an international group of experts as they explored the role of police and citizens, especially women, in countering violent extremism (CVE), during a workshop hosted by USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding. 

Nigerian soldiers survey passing civilians in the government reserved area of Maiduguri, in north-eastern Nigeria, July 19, 2011. An Islamist insurgency that has haunted northern Nigeria appears to be branching out and collaborating with al-Qaida's affiliates, alarming Western officials and analysts who had previously viewed the militants here as a largely isolated, if deadly, menace. (Samuel James/The New York Times)
Nigerian soldiers survey passing civilians in the government reserved area of Maiduguri, in north-eastern Nigeria. An Islamist insurgency that has haunted northern Nigeria appears to be branching out. Photo Credit: The NYT/ Samuel James

The workshop grew out of the institute’s Women Preventing Extremist Violence (WPEV) Project, which aims to work with women civic activists in Kenya and Nigeria to foster relationships with police in an effort to build community resilience to violence.

The July 2014 meeting, entitled “Women Preventing Extremist Violence Expert Workshop: Examining the Parameters of Police-Community Engagement in Countering Violent Extremism,” gathered a  mixed group of participants--security sector and gender experts from the United States, civic activists from Kenya and Nigeria, and police from Turkey and the United Kingdom. They defined effective community policing as a partnership between the police and the community to guarantee safety and security for both men and women.

How can communities develop mutually beneficial community policing strategies to reflect the needs of all citizens—men, women, boys and girls?

While community policing is not a new concept, the reality of providing security in transitional areas is complicated by a lack of effective and accountable institutions and basic lack of trust between civilians and the forces that are supposed to protect them. With conditions such as these, how can communities develop mutually beneficial community policing strategies to reflect the needs of all citizens—men, women, boys and girls?

The answer is that there is no one-size-fits-all approach. What emerged from the facilitated discussion, collective brainstorming activities and emblematic case studies was that good community policing is highly dependent on context, must be supported by the community, and is not always done by official police forces.  

The workshop findings provided a foundation for a USIP Special Report. The publication is intended to guide practitioners on developing and designing community policing programs, the role of women in those programs and the implications for CVE strategies.

The experts honed in on the attributes that must exist in a security force for it to be capable of undertaking community policing roles. Unsurprisingly, the experts identified legitimacy, honesty, fairness, transparency, responsiveness and accountability as key characteristics for both the institution as well as the individual members of the force. The workshop participants  also determined that police forces  need to reflect the communities in which they work and hold shared values.

Another key outcome of the discussion was the idea that community policing is not done by the police alone, but that security is a shared responsibility for the police force and its citizens. As a result, a strong relationship based on clear communication between citizens and the police is necessary for a community policing strategy to succeed.

Experts assessed three case studies: one from northern Nigeria, another involving the Somali diaspora in London, and a third from Korogocho in Nairobi, Kenya. Participants mapped the existence of the necessary attributes for effective police-community engagement. Each case had some but not all of the attributes, and the variations among the cases reinforced the importance of context.

In some cases, racial or religious profiling undermined community policing efforts. In other situations, colonial-era policing structures impeded responsiveness to community needs. Policing structures have changed little since Nigeria’s and Kenya’s colonial eras,  when the purpose of the forces was to repress citizens rather than provide them with security.

Each case, however, demonstrated a key requirement that is pivotal to effectiveness: constant and clear communication between the police force and its citizens.

Shannon Zimmerman is a senior program specialist and Megan Loney is a program assistant, both in USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding. They work on the WPEV project and helped organize and coordinate the expert workshop.

Related Publications

USIP in Nigeria: Connecting Civic, State Leaders to Stem Violence

USIP in Nigeria: Connecting Civic, State Leaders to Stem Violence

Thursday, May 3, 2018

By: Susan Stigant; Oge Onubogu

A common thread underlying many of Nigeria’s most pressing problems is a failure of governance—a disconnect between officials and citizens in Africa’s biggest democracy. Whether the issue is the rise of Boko Haram, corruption or persistent intercommunal violence, the failure of government to understand or meet the needs of diverse groups of Nigerians is often the cause of volatile breakdowns.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Nancy Lindborg on Nigeria's Central Role in Africa

Nancy Lindborg on Nigeria's Central Role in Africa

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

By:

Fresh from her USIP delegation trip to Nigeria, Nancy Lindborg explains Nigeria’s importance to Africa and the United States. Lindborg discusses the critical on-the-ground work happening to prevent violence and underscores the importance of Nigerian governors to countering Boko Haram.

Peace Processes

Democracy and Security in Africa Depend on Nigeria

Democracy and Security in Africa Depend on Nigeria

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

By: Nancy Lindborg

When Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari met with President Trump on Monday, much attention was paid to the importance of counterterror efforts and economic investments that will help the country continue its climb out of its deep recession. These are both critical areas for U.S. focus and assistance, but will not ultimately be sufficient to resolve Nigeria’s internal and regional security challenges.

Democracy & Governance; Violent Extremism

Trump Meets Nigeria's Buhari Amid Lake Chad Crisis

Trump Meets Nigeria's Buhari Amid Lake Chad Crisis

Thursday, April 26, 2018

By: Oge Onubogu ; Chris Kwaja

When President Donald Trump meets Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari on April 30, problems of terrorism and security across much of Africa’s Sahel region will get renewed media attention. Although the Boko Haram extremist group has been forced back from the large territories it once ruled and terrorized, its militants still carry out attacks. And groups linked to al-Qaeda and ISIS continue to operate in the Sahel, pursued by a U.S.-backed multinational military force. Talks at the White House will focus on broader issues of democracy and stability for Nigeria and the surrounding region.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

View All Publications