Nearly two months since the Afghan Parliamentary elections in September, the final election results have yet to be certified. Join USIP for a discussion of the unfolding election controversy, and what it means for the future legitimacy of the Afghan Parliament and the electoral process.

On October 20, the Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan (IEC) announced the full preliminary results of the September 18 Afghan Parliamentary elections, invalidating 1.2 million fraudulent votes in the process. This was initially seen as a positive sign that the IEC was taking a responsible stand against election fraud, but three weeks later the final results have still not been certified. Contributing to the uncertainty, the Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC) removed several leading candidates for campaign misconduct, and supporters of unsuccessful candidates have resorted to protests and roadblocks in demands for more information.

Despite the appearance of improvements over the 2009 elections, the delay in final results is revealing these Parliamentary elections to have deep flaws. Please join USIP for a discussion of the recent controversy that has unfolded over the elections since the announcement of the preliminary results. The panel will explain those steps taken by the IEC and ECC to address widespread voting irregularities, and whether or not these steps are adequate to preserve the integrity of the Parliamentary vote.

Speakers

  • Scott Worden is a senior rule of law adviser at USIP and was in Kabul as an observer of the 2010 elections. He also served as one of three international commissioners on the Electoral Complaints Commission in 2009.
  • Raissa Tatad-Harzell is the senior program manager for Afghanistan with the National Democratic Institute (NDI), which ran an official observer mission to the 2010 elections and runs several programs on democratic and governance support to Afghanistan.
  • Noah Coburn is a traditional dispute resolution specialist in USIP's Kabul Office, and has conducted research on local attitudes toward elections and democracy for the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU).
  • Andrew Wilder, moderator, is the director of Afghanistan and Pakistan programs at USIP, and has conducted extensive research on regional electoral politics.

 

Related Publications

Four Lessons for Security Sector Reform in Afghanistan

Four Lessons for Security Sector Reform in Afghanistan

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

By: Jason Criss Howk; Andrew Hyde; Annie Pforzheimer

As Afghan peace talks in Doha move forward, a vital component to the success of any peace deal will be how Afghanistan’s security sector can reform to sustain peace after more than 40 years of violence, and how the international community can best assist. This effort would benefit from recalling the lessons of another time when there was need for a comprehensive reconsideration of Afghanistan’s security sector: the two years immediately following the 2001 overthrow of the Taliban regime. Despite the many important changes, the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) have undergone and a dramatically different context, key lessons from 2002-03 remain relevant to guide thinking ahead of and after a peace agreement.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

What do Afghans think about peace? Just ask their artists.

What do Afghans think about peace? Just ask their artists.

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

By: Johnny Walsh

Historic peace talks between the Taliban and Afghan government began in early September, opening a window for peace after four decades of conflict. Afghans, overwhelmingly weary of war and craving an end to violence, are watching closely. This urge for peace is the most important force motivating the talks, and Afghanistan’s burgeoning community of artists articulate it especially powerfully.

Type: Blog

Peace Processes

Afghanistan Donor Conference 2020: Pitfalls and Possibilities

Afghanistan Donor Conference 2020: Pitfalls and Possibilities

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

By: William Byrd

When Afghan officials and international donors meet next month to consider future aid commitments to Afghanistan, they will face a changed situation from their last gathering four years ago. Then, the focus was on tying financial assistance to government reform in the midst of ongoing war with the Taliban; peace was barely on the agenda. Now, peace talks between the Taliban and the government have begun, and a new Afghan administration is still taking shape with an agreement that resolved the disputed 2019 presidential election. Meanwhile, fighting and casualties remain at unsustainable levels and the country is reckoning with the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Economics & Environment; Democracy & Governance

Whither Islam in Afghanistan’s Political System After the Taliban Talks?

Whither Islam in Afghanistan’s Political System After the Taliban Talks?

Wednesday, October 7, 2020

By: Peter Mandaville, Ph.D.

The question of how and where Islam should fit into future legal and political frameworks has emerged as a major sticking point in the talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government in Qatar. How this question is resolved will be closely watched by Afghans, who want to ensure their hard-won rights are not sacrificed for the sake of a deal with the Taliban—Afghan women in particular have much at stake. The international community will similarly scrutinize the outcome, and their engagement with Afghanistan after the talks is expected to be conditioned on the contours of any political settlement.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Religion; Peace Processes

View All Publications