Sighs of relief resounded throughout Central Africa and far beyond when Joseph Kabila, president of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), announced his decision to take a step back in the December 23 presidential elections. His support of Emmanuel Ramazani Shadari (former interior minister and loyalist of Kabila’s PPRD) as the ruling party candidate removes the possibility that Kabila would ignore or eliminate term limits, which would further destabilize the fragile country.

A portrait of Joseph Kabila
A portrait of Joseph Kabila. (The New York Times/Jehad Nga)

In a region with a long history of political violence and tense elections, the departure of a repressive ruler is welcome. But the coast is far from clear as the DRC remains home to a medley of armed groups, inept institutions, vast humanitarian challenges, and overwhelming logistical hurdles less than four months until Election Day.

In his analysis, John Mukum Mbaku rightly argues that Kabila's decision significantly reduces the probability of another civil war—anti-Kabila protests had already turned deadly early this year.  But the risk of widespread election violence persists. Government repression of dissent continues, and both the election commission and Constitutional Court seem unable and unwilling to ensure free and fair elections. Two leading opposition contenders, Jean-Pierre Bemba and Moise Katumbi, have been banned from running. A Medvedev-like scenario, in which Ramazani saves a seat for Kabila in 2023, remains plausible.

The Power of Preventive Diplomacy

The pressure on Kabila had been mounting, and his decision may demonstrate the effectiveness of preventive diplomacy. By running for re-election Kabila would violate the constitution's two-term limit, a move that could have triggered renewed clashes between police and demonstrators fed up with corruption and repression. His popularity has steadily waned, and both the domestic and international pressure was mounting.

Beyond the threats and statements by the United Nations, the African Union (AU) and the United States, regional powers like Angola and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) had added their voices. In May, Angolan President João Lourenço made it clear that Kabila should not run again. Angola experienced its own historic transition of power in 2017 (the first in almost four decades) and felt well-positioned to pressure the regime.

So, what is next? Continued diplomatic pressure will be required to avoid stalling tactics and help ensure a fair electoral process with an equal playing field. According to the International Crisis Group's Hans Hoebeke, the SADC and AU should support an audit of the voter register and inspection of voting machines, while pushing the Kabila regime to relax its political repression. Security forces will need more professionalism, trust and capacity, while observers should capture the broad array of election violence types the DRC will likely face in the coming months, so it can be better prevented in the future.

Related Research & Analysis

What DRC-Rwanda Peace Deal Means for the U.S. and Africa’s Mineral-Rich Great Lakes Region

What DRC-Rwanda Peace Deal Means for the U.S. and Africa’s Mineral-Rich Great Lakes Region

Thursday, July 3, 2025

Last Friday, the foreign ministers of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) met in Washington to sign an agreement to end 30 years of conflict in Africa’s Great Lakes region. The peace deal was accompanied by commitments to build a “regional economic integration framework” and promises of U.S. investment in eastern DRC’s abundant critical mineral reserves, among other commercial agreements.

Type: Question and Answer

How Critical Mineral Partnerships Can Serve Both African and U.S. Interests

How Critical Mineral Partnerships Can Serve Both African and U.S. Interests

Thursday, February 27, 2025

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is looking for U.S. investors in the mining sector as a way to break China’s dominance over the country’s reserves of cobalt, copper and other critical minerals. However, the DRC’s struggles with violence and weak governance make this seem like a risky proposition — but it doesn’t have to be. USIP’s Thomas Sheehy, Gécamines’ Guy-Robert Lukama and USIP Senior Study Group on Critical Minerals in Africa member Anthony Carroll explain how the United States can build mutually beneficial partnerships with countries like the DRC that address, rather than worsen, regional instability and serve U.S. economic and security interests.

Type: Blog

Joseph Sany on the Rwanda-DRC Conflict and the Risk of Regional War

Joseph Sany on the Rwanda-DRC Conflict and the Risk of Regional War

Wednesday, February 12, 2025

After decades of poor governance, ethnic tensions and illegal resource exploitation in the mineral-rich eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwandan-backed rebels’ capture of Goma “has the potential to bring … seven countries into [the] conflict” and ignite a wider regional war, says USIP’s Joseph Sany.

Type: Podcast

A DRC-Rwanda Truce is Key for African and U.S. Interests — Here’s How to Get There

A DRC-Rwanda Truce is Key for African and U.S. Interests — Here’s How to Get There

Thursday, February 6, 2025

On January 27, Rwandan-backed rebels known as  M23 captured Goma, the largest city in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), despite the presence of U.N. peacekeeping force, defense forces from other African countries, local militias, and European mercenaries hired to block its advance. Nearly 3,000 people were killed in M23’s advance into Goma, including the provincial military governor. Roughly 500,000 people fled their homes, adding to the more than two million people displaced by the long-standing conflict.

Type: Question and Answer

View All Research & Analysis