Fatima Kadhim al-Bahadly, an activist for women in southern Iraq, remembers the swell of chaos across her country last June. The extremist militant group calling itself “the Islamic State” had captured Mosul in the north, and the country’s most powerful cleric, Ayatollah Ali Sistani, had issued a call for citizens to take up arms against the insurgents. Suddenly, her city of Basra was awash in weapons. Young men left universities to join armed groups.

event panel

A mother of three boys, al-Bahadly worried that her children too could be swept up in the turmoil. So when she heard about a training center where many of the new recruits were being honed for battle, she embarked on a mission to persuade the youths to find more constructive ways to help. She collected $5,000 to buy food and clothes so they would have an alternative to the benefits of joining a fighting group. She connected with 500 of them on social media and began finding community service tasks for them, like cleaning hospitals or schools.

“When I met those young people at the training center, I found that they are carrying misleading understandings about carrying weapons, about jihad, and about life and death,” she told an audience at USIP last week, speaking through an interpreter.

It’s a classic example of a phenomenon that Western aid organizations too often overlook – local leaders and activists already doing the yeoman’s work of countering radicalization and recruitment to militant groups. Such local initiatives are organic rather than spurred by outside funding or strategies, and therefore more likely to succeed, especially if they’re supported effectively.

There is already work that’s being done at the front lines of some of the most extreme violence that we’re seeing.” – USIP’s Susan Hayward

“There is already work that’s being done at the front lines of some of the most extreme violence that we’re seeing,” said Susan Hayward, USIP’s interim director of religion and peacebuilding. “She knew what the problems were and how to address [them].” Hayward said afterwards that it was clear that al-Bahadly didn’t need any outside “experts” to tell her what to do or how to do it.

The USIP event was an extension of the annual Human Rights Defenders forum held at The Carter Center in Atlanta Feb. 7-10. Several of the international participants in the forum traveled to Washington to share recommendations with policymakers on how to counter extremist violence with sensitivity to religious and gender dynamics.

Both events preceded this week’s White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism.

"Groups like al-Qaida and ISIL exploit the anger that festers when people feel that injustice and corruption leave them with no chance of improving their lives," Obama wrote in a Feb. 17 commentary in the Los Angeles Times that also was cited in news reports about the summit. "The world has to offer today's youth something better."

Transforming societies from within

Hayward and USIP’s Manal Omar, the acting vice president for Middle East and Africa programs, participated in the Carter Center forum. The Atlanta center has since set up an online Forum on Women, Religion, Violence and Power to continue the discussion. President Carter was the chair of his Center’s forum and recently wrote a book on the topic.

“Our view – and his view when he was in the White House – is that people can actually transform their societies from within,” Karin Ryan, senior advisor for human rights at The Carter Center, told the USIP audience. “And our job is to think about how we can help them and not impose from the outside.”

While physical threats such as those arising from the group calling itself “the Islamic State” might require a forceful military response, as much funding as possible also should be dedicated to a more long-term solution, Ryan said.

“We are relying on tactics now,” she said. “What we need is vision.”

At USIP, al-Bahadly said one kind of support she needs is more funding and media attention to spread the word and expand the project. The boys and young men didn’t understand, for example, that jihad is not necessarily about violence or carrying weapons, al-Bahadly said.

Mubin Shaikh was born and raised in Canada, but he became radicalized at age 19.  The 9/11 attacks prompted him to go to Syria to study Islam and Arabic culture, and he soon renounced militancy and joined Canadian intelligence as an undercover operative. Now a prominent counter-terrorism expert, he said at the USIP discussion that “the real work is being done” in villages the world over like the communities of women peacemakers he heard at a conference in San Diego.

“Everyone will tell you [that] you can’t kill your way out of this problem,” he said.

USIP’s research and programs to prevent and counter violent extremism in countries such as Nigeria, Iraq and Burma delve into the areas where gender, religion and the drivers of conflict intersect. In each case, the Institute works in partnership with organizations and community leaders on the ground, Hayward said.

“Sometimes there can be a little bit of baggage with American organizations coming in to support these efforts,” Hayward said. “So how can we do that work strategically and safely for them and in ways that are effective, recognizing who is already doing this work on the ground [and is} often not seen?”

A purple hijab

Alaa Murabit is another example. She founded The Voice of Libyan Women when she was just 21 years old in an effort to strengthen the status and influence of women in the society. An initial attempt to promote international conventions failed because it didn’t fit naturally yet with what people in local communities understood.

Her next attempt scored – International Purple Hijab Day, a campaign to end domestic violence with an annual commemoration on Feb. 13, when supporters wear a purple hijab, tie or scarf. Thousands participated in the first year, 2012, and the Prime Minister made a public statement on television that domestic violence violated their belief system. The second year, Queen Noor of Jordan and other international elites signed on, and 35 cities and media outlets joined the campaign through their public schools.

“This was a way where we could address social issues, where people felt comfortable [and that] their belief system was being recognized, and we could actually make significant change,” Murabit said. “Our justice minister that year spoke out in favor of reparations for rape victims.”

The International Civil Society Action Network (ICAN) has a specific affiliated network of women’s groups in 13 countries that are affected by increasing militarism and extremism, who produce security briefs for early warning of radicalization and recruitment, said Sanam Naraghi-Anderlini, a co-found of ICAN. Their Winter 2013 issue quoted “Islamic State” leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi saying, “We’re coming back to get you.” Six months later, the militant group exploded into the public consciousness in northern Iraq.

“This is from women on the ground who were telling us, `We’re seeing the extremists coming,’” Naraghi-Anderlini told the USIP audience. “I can give you Libya – same story. We just published one on Turkey. It is early warning, and so we need to take that seriously.”

Women in these environments do have power and influence, she said, as the threats to their safety attest, Naraghi-Anderlini said.

USIP’s Omar lamented that, while the passage of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 in October 2000 called for women to play a greater role in decision-making on conflicts and peace efforts, that hasn’t translated into practice and change on the ground.

“We just keep repeating the recommendations, but over and over we’re failing to initiate them, particularly in times of conflict,” Omar said. “We know that religion is a powerful tool, both negative and positive,” Omar said.

But most often, efforts to incorporate religion into the struggle against extremist violence involve either sidelining religious leaders or using them as a tool for delivering counter-messaging, rather than nurturing genuine partnerships to address the full range of issues, she said.

“The quickest way to change a community – and the most sustainable and practical – is through the people who have access in that community,” Murabit said. “If we continue to solely bomb schools and bomb hospitals and create this feeling of persecution in the local community, we’re only going to get more young men who want to pick up guns.”

Related Publications

Contested Citizenship Marginalizes Libya’s Vulnerable

Contested Citizenship Marginalizes Libya’s Vulnerable

Thursday, May 27, 2021

By: Abigail Corey; Ali Alansari

After a decade of conflict, Libya has made welcome progress toward stability. A cease-fire inked in October 2020 paved the way for the establishment of an interim unity government tasked with preparing for national elections at the end of 2021. While these developments are cause for hope, numerous issues remain that could threaten long-team peace — including many people’s undetermined legal status. An estimated several hundred thousand people in Libya — even some born and raised in the country — lack proof of citizenship. Marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities, are among those most impacted by citizenship struggles. In this war-torn country, this is but another issue that exacerbates conflict and tension. 

Type: Blog

Human Rights; Peace Processes

Libya: Amid Hope for Peace, Regional Rifts Still Pose Hurdles

Libya: Amid Hope for Peace, Regional Rifts Still Pose Hurdles

Friday, February 26, 2021

By: Simona Ross; Stefan Wolff

Libyans and the United Nations advanced their current effort to end almost a decade of instability and war this month when a U.N.-backed forum nominated an interim government to prepare nationwide elections by the end of 2021. The new transitional government brings hope that this process—the third major U.N. peace effort in Libya—might lead to stability. Still, achieving lasting peace will require that the process address the main underlying driver of conflict: the divisions among Libya’s three main regions, notably over how to organize the government. It also will need the United States and other countries to support the transitional government and hold Libya’s contesting sides accountable.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Peace Processes; Democracy & Governance

Libya 10 Years After Revolution: To Forgive or Forget

Libya 10 Years After Revolution: To Forgive or Forget

Thursday, February 18, 2021

By: Esra Elbakoush; Nate Wilson

This week marks the 10-year anniversary of the uprising that overthrew the four-decade dictatorship of Muammar Qaddafi. In the intervening decade, Libya has been mired in conflict and political gridlock, exacerbated by competing power centers and longstanding tribal hostilities. What’s more, a host of foreign powers have entered the fray, looking to pursue their own interests rather than build a peaceful Libya. While there is momentum toward peace in recent months, Libyans will have to decide for themselves how to arrive at reconciliation and build a roadmap to get to a sustainable peace. But what does that look like?

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Peace Processes; Reconciliation

The Current Situation in Libya

The Current Situation in Libya

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

Eight years after the fall of Muammar Qaddafi, Libya continues to struggle to end its violent conflict and build state institutions. External actors have exacerbated Libya’s problems by funneling money and weapons to proxies that have put personal interests above those of the Libyan people.

Type: Fact Sheet

View All Publications