With the U.N. calling April the bloodiest month in Iraq in almost five years, USIP experts warn that the rapidly escalating violence must be contained soon to forestall a deterioration that will cost far more effort and resources if not addressed.

Unlike any time in the past 16 months, the threat of all-out chaos and violence in Iraq’s most volatile provinces is high and has a potential to return the country to the upheaval of 2005-2007 or worse, given the regional dynamics and the complications stemming from the war in neighboring Syria.

While interest in developments inside Iraq has shifted away for many experts, the country’s future is pivotal to the region. What had been just potential for the conflicts in Iraq and Syria to influence each other has escalated to a combined threat in many ways. Groups such as Islamic State of Iraq and Jabhat al-Nusra have already merged leadership, and fighting forces on both sides of the border are actively pursuing their political aspirations of mutual support. This rapidly evolving scenario will require far more effort and resources to contain if action is delayed.  

Recent developments have extended beyond the political turmoil that has marked Iraq in recent years to clashes between the army, protesters and armed groups in provinces such as Kirkuk, Salahaddin, Anbar, Diyala, and Nineveh have led to increased violence. The confrontations have led to hundreds of casualties among the security forces and the civilians. The Reuters news agency reported that the United Nations counts 712 people killed in bomb attacks and other violence in April, making it the bloodiest month in five years in Iraq.

In the central-northern city of Hawija in Kirkuk Province, about 175 miles north of Baghdad, peaceful efforts to resolve a standoff between the army and local residents were not given a chance as the troops raided a square where public demonstrations had taken place. The protests had led to a siege that lasted days after earlier clashes with the army. The military’s raid ended with a serious tragedy where tens of lives were lost. 

The control of the security forces, particularly the military, has been shaken and loosened in Anbar, Kirkuk and Nineveh. Armed groups are increasingly exerting greater influence in Mosul, Anbar and parts of Kirkuk. The army is imposing curfews at night in many areas of these provinces, but the military has been coming under attack, in many cases leading to loss of life.

Former Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker noted in a column in The Washington Post this week that the locations where violence has broken out are “eerily familiar, as many were strongholds of al-Qaida in Iraq at the outset of the surge, before the spread of the Awakening movement that fostered reconciliation between disaffected Sunni Arabs and the Shiite-led government in Baghdad.”

“The recent events come on top of increasing incidents of horrific attacks by al-Qaida in Iraq, with last month seeing the largest losses in years,” Crocker wrote. “These developments clearly require the attention and support of the international community, led by the United States.”

In Baghdad, the army maintains tight control, yet explosions and attacks continue to occur, civilians are killed, and many residents stay home, because it is too risky to go to work or send children to school. Sunni tribal and religious leaders are issuing threats and ultimatums not only to the army and the government, but the wider Shia community. Other relatively stable provinces like Maysan and Diwaniyah have been the target of car bombs. Places of worship like mosques and Husseiniyahs (specifically Shia houses of worship) are being attacked, killing tens and injuring hundreds, signaling an escalating trend of ethnic groups taking revenge whenever they feel they can.

The turmoil is compounded by internal displacement and the resurrection of armed groups that tore the country apart in the aftermath of the U.S. invasion in 2003. 

It is unclear who can do what, because the situation is so fluid. USIP’s Iraq Core Team is following the situation closely, assessing what the Institute can do directly and through our partners in the U.S. government, the Iraqi government, and Iraqi civil society. Members of the Network of Iraqi Facilitators and the SILM (“Peace Net: Peace for a Unified Iraq”) network of civic organizations, both backed by USIP, and others are also looking for ways to engage. They are already taking some steps, but the measures are still limited compared to what is needed. 

We urgently need to find ways to leverage all our expertise and resources. 

USIP will host a discussion on Monday, May 6, with the International Organization for Migration (IOM) to address the question of what we all can do. Retired Ambassador to Iraq James Jeffrey and Ambassador Daniel Serwer, who served as executive director of the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group, will join experts from the host organizations on the panel.

Manal Omar directs USIP’s Iraq, Iran and North Africa programs. Sarhang Hamasaeed is a program officer with USIP's Iraq and North Africa programs.

 

Related Publications

What’s Behind Moqtada al-Sadr’s Bid to Shake up Iraq’s Politics?

What’s Behind Moqtada al-Sadr’s Bid to Shake up Iraq’s Politics?

Thursday, August 4, 2022

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed

Over the weekend, followers of the powerful Iraqi Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr stormed and occupied Iraq’s parliament in protest over a rival bloc attempting to form a government. The move comes less than two months after al-Sadr’s bloc in parliament resigned after its failure to form a majoritarian government following its victory in the October 2021 elections. Nearly 10 months after those elections, there is still no new government and the stability of the country is at stake as this showdown between al-Sadr’s supporters and his political rivals continues to play out.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance

ISIS is a Problem of Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

ISIS is a Problem of Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

Thursday, July 28, 2022

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed

More than three years after its military defeat in Iraq and Syria, ISIS is a downgraded threat thanks to the collective efforts of the U.S.-led global coalition that coalesced to defeat it along with Iraqi and Syrian partners. While the extremist group’s capacity has been drastically reduced and millions of people have returned home, ISIS has managed to continue attacks year after year despite no longer holding territory. Meanwhile, some of the most difficult human legacies — the challenges facing the people the ISIS conflict left behind — are still with us, with no end in sight.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Violent Extremism

Al-Hol: Displacement Crisis is a Tinderbox that Could Ignite ISIS 2.0

Al-Hol: Displacement Crisis is a Tinderbox that Could Ignite ISIS 2.0

Wednesday, May 11, 2022

By: Mona Yacoubian

More than three years after ISIS’s territorial defeat, the vexing challenge of displacement threatens to provoke the rise of ISIS 2.0 if not adequately addressed. The May 11 Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS ministerial meeting in Marrakech, Morocco highlights these concerns over the evolving threat the so-called Islamic State still poses. The Marrakech meeting coincides with both growing disquiet at deteriorating humanitarian and security conditions in the al-Hol displacement camp in northeast Syria — ground zero for the ISIS-related displacement crisis — and some hope for a path forward.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Human RightsViolent Extremism

A New Test for Iraq’s Democracy and Stability

A New Test for Iraq’s Democracy and Stability

Monday, March 7, 2022

By: Knox Thames;  Sarhang Hamasaeed

The sudden crisis around Russia threatens democratic norms and energy markets worldwide, only heightening the urgency of stabilizing Iraq, the world’s fifth-largest oil producer. Yet five months after Iraq’s elections, held in response to massive protests against ineffective governance, political factions remain dangerously deadlocked in efforts to form a new government. Shaping a more stable, peaceful Iraq—and responding to the 2019-2020 grassroots demands for democratic, accountable governance—will require a fuller inclusion of Iraq’s ethnic and religious minorities. Yet the prospects remain unclear. Iraq’s minority communities are watching carefully, as their future depends on it. 

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance

View All Publications