On October 15, 2008, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates delivered the keynote speech at the U.S. Institute of Peace’s first annual Dean Acheson Lecture. In his address, Gates called for the United States to develop national security institutions better able to respond to increasingly complex challenges in international conflict settings.

Primary among the Secretary’s recommendations was the need for better coordination and more balanced representation between military and civilian personnel in conflict zones. Promoting this kind of coordination has been a major component of USIP’s work for more than a decade.

As Acheson did "so brilliantly," stressed Gates, "We must be prepared to change old ways of doing business and create new institutions—both nationally and internationally—to deal with the long-term challenges we face abroad, and our own national security toolbox must be equipped with more than just hammers."

"The security of the American people will depend increasingly on our ability to head off the next insurgency or arrest the collapse of another failing state," reflected Gates. "I assume we will be able to count on organizations like USIP to continue down this road."

USIP has become a thought leader on institution building and civil-military coordination and a convener of sometimes-disparate parties involved in international conflict management. Among the Institute’s many efforts in this field, it recently contributed to a new U.S. Army stability operations doctrine that seeks to better integrate civilian and military efforts. For nearly a decade, the Institute has worked to develop the State Department’s new Civilian Response Corps, which prepares teams of specialized civilians to lead reconstruction efforts that have increasingly fallen to military hands.

In his speech, Gates highlighted violent extremism—particularly in Afghanistan—as a threat to national security. "That country has become the laboratory for what I've been talking about for the past year—how to apply and fully integrate the full range of instruments of national power and international cooperation to protect our security and our vital interests." He emphasized the need for strengthening the role of NATO, improved strategic communications with the Afghan people and training for Afghan security forces.

"It is a scenario Acheson could relate to," Gates said, noting the challenges faced by 42 countries and hundreds of NGOs working there as part of a multinational, civilian-military effort on the ground. He added, "Afghanistan is the test, on the grandest scale, of what we are trying to achieve when it comes to integrating the military and civilian, the public and private, the national and international."

Gates says the work of institutions like USIP is a key factor in helping the U.S. make the type of "enlightened counter-measures" needed to move forward.

No stranger to the work of USIP, Gates was an original member of the Iraq Study Group (ISG), which the Institute facilitated at the behest of Congress in 2006. He left the ISG to become Secretary of Defense shortly before the group issued its findings. "Little did I dream as we met in the Institute’s offices through the Spring, Summer, and early Fall of 2006 trying to come up with a constructive way forward in Iraq that my life was about to change dramatically."

Acheson: An Enduring Relevance

Gates drew parallels between today’s international setting and that of Acheson, who as Secretary of State at the dawn of the Cold War was a principal architect of American foreign policy for the next half century. Both were transformative periods that required the "full strength of America," as Acheson said, to integrate all the elements of national power to face new threats. In Acheson’s time the primary threat was the rise of the Soviet Union. Twenty years after the fall of the Soviets, America has emerged to the new threat of violent extremism and failing states.

Gates highlighted Acheson’s legacy as an inspiration to face modern challenges. "When America is willing to lead, when we meet our commitments and stand with our allies even in times of trouble, when we make the necessary institutional changes, when we make the necessary sacrifices… then great and good things can happen for our country and for the world. Dean Acheson believed this, and so do I."

In introducing Gates, USIP Board Chair J. Robinson West observed that, "Dean Acheson and Bob Gates are very much in the spirit and purpose of the United States Institute of Peace. They are practical and imaginative, as is USIP."

West noted that USIP instituted the lecture to honor Acheson, a "great man during times of challenge and change." "We need leadership which offers an understanding of the world in which we live as well as the strengths and limits of our own country. Dean Acheson provided it during his time, just as our speaker tonight provides it today."

West highlighted the importance of USIP’s new headquarters as a symbol for America’s values and aspirations for a safer, more peaceful and just world in the 21st Century.

Story text by Allyson Slater and Peter C. Lyon.

 

<< Back to Dean Acheson Lecture page

Latest Publications

As U.S.-China Ties Slide, Trump and Xi look to Bridge Divide

As U.S.-China Ties Slide, Trump and Xi look to Bridge Divide

Wednesday, June 26, 2019

By: Patricia M. Kim; Jacob Stokes

President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are set to have an “extended meeting” on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Japan this week. The summit comes amid an escalating trade dispute and a recent U.S. decision to ban five Chinese tech companies from buying U.S. equipment without government approval. Beyond trade and technology issues, Trump and Xi are expected to discuss nuclear negotiations with North Korea—following Xi’s meeting last week with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un—and increased U.S.-Iran tensions. USIP’s Patricia Kim and Jacob Stokes analyze how the trade dispute has impacted the bilateral relationship and prospects for cooperation between Washington and Beijing.

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

The Origins and Future of the Iran Crisis

The Origins and Future of the Iran Crisis

Tuesday, June 25, 2019

By: Robin Wright

The confrontation between the United States and Iran has shifted again as President Trump and the administration announced financial sanctions against Iran’s supreme leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and other Iranian officials. Within days, the crisis has spun from attacks on oil tankers to an Iranian missile strike on a U.S. military surveillance drone, all centered around the Persian Gulf, the economic artery for about a third of the world’s oil. Hours after President Trump announced the latest sanctions, USIP’s Robin Wright—who directs the Institute’s Iran Primer project—discussed where the crisis stands, and where it could turn.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

As China Projects Power in the Indo-Pacific, How Should the U.S. Respond?

As China Projects Power in the Indo-Pacific, How Should the U.S. Respond?

Tuesday, June 25, 2019

By: Adam Gallagher

There is a growing bipartisan consensus in Washington that China’s ascendance is a major strategic concern for U.S. and international security and stability. This is reflected in the 2017 U.S. National Security Strategy, which recalibrates U.S. foreign policy to address the challenges posed to American power and interests from escalating geopolitical competition with China and Russia. After a recent trip to the Indo-Pacific region, Rep. Ed Case (D-HI) and Rep. John Rutherford (R-FL) said they came away alarmed at how China is tightening its grip on U.S. allies across the region. What can the U.S. do to address China’s power projection and coercion in the Indo-Pacific and beyond?

Global Policy; Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Five Things You Need to Know About Foreign Funding for Social Movements

Five Things You Need to Know About Foreign Funding for Social Movements

Monday, June 24, 2019

By: Davin O'Regan

From Kenya to Ukraine to Guatemala, citizen-led campaigns are fighting against corruption and demanding government accountability and transparency. Government donors and private foundation have increasingly supported such efforts. But, how does foreign funding impact the goals social movements seek to achieve and the tactics they use to get there? How does foreign funding impact a social movement’s ability to mobilize the masses? And what should external funders consider when supporting social movements? USIP’s Davin O’Regan discusses the finding of a forthcoming USIP Peaceworks examining the impact of external support to social movements focused on transparency and accountability.

Nonviolent Action

Sudan Remains at a Stalemate After the Military’s Crackdown

Sudan Remains at a Stalemate After the Military’s Crackdown

Thursday, June 20, 2019

By: Elizabeth Murray

It’s been over two months since Sudan’s longtime dictator, Omar al-Bashir, was overthrown by the country’s military following months of popular protests. On June 3, the Transitional Military Council (TMC)—which has been ruling since Bashir’s ouster—escalated its lethal crackdown on peaceful protesters in Khartoum and other cities. The protesters say that their demand is the same as before—a transition to civilian rule—but that they will not negotiate with the TMC unless it first meets certain conditions. What’s happening in Sudan? When will negotiations on the country’s transition resume? How can the international community help? USIP’s Elizabeth Murray discusses the latest on the situation in Sudan.

Democracy & Governance

View All Publications