China is a relative newcomer to peacebuilding, but its recent moves to participate in Afghan peace talks, fund and influence progress in Burma’s peace process, invest in Pakistan, and contribute to United Nations peacekeeping missions demonstrate its expanding role in conflict zones of strategic interest to the United States. China’s increased engagement presents opportunities for reducing violent conflict, but U.S. and Chinese interests and approaches do not always align. In countries where China exerts a strong influence, it can have a substantial impact—positive or negative—on local and international efforts to curb violence and extremism.


Ambassador Cui Tiankai on U.S.-China Cooperation in Peace and Security
Speaking at USIP in April 2014, China’s ambassador said working more closely on shared interests could help the U.S. and China manage differences. USIP has hosted Chinese dignitaries, U.S. Cabinet members, and then-President Bill Clinton to discuss China’s growing impact on the world.

The U.S. Institute of Peace has been engaged in the Asia-Pacific region for decades to support an international system that is more willing and able to manage violent conflict. The new China Program, established in 2016, continues that tradition. Through research, dialogue, and training, USIP provides evidence-based analysis of China’s activities and impact, identifies areas for collaboration where appropriate, and develops strategies for preventing differences from exacerbating instability or undermining broader peacebuilding.

Research and Analysis. USIP supports research and analysis that examines China’s effect on peace and conflict dynamics around the world. Early projects studied China’s budding peace diplomacy, including its approach to the Burma peace process, its evolving support for the U.N.’s “Responsibility to Protect” framework, and its growing involvement in U.N. peacekeeping operations. USIP seeks to shed light on the structural and theoretical underpinnings of China’s influence overseas, facilitating analysis of the domestic forces behind China’s foreign policy and China’s “economics first” approach to peacebuilding and post-conflict reconstruction.

The Institute also supports research on the execution and impact of China’s major investment projects in conflict-affected areas, such as the Belt and Road Initiative and its components, including the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

Collaboration to Improve Peacebuilding. USIP designs, develops, and funds dialogues that help partners in the U.S., China, and third countries learn from one another and identify concrete actions to strengthen peacebuilding efforts. By partnering with scholars and practitioners to share their respective insights, experiences, and expertise, USIP helps peacebuilders around the world develop the tools to do their work more effectively.

For example, USIP supports consultations among key stakeholders from the U.S., China, and Africa to discuss ways the U.S. and China can help address some of Africa’s most pressing security challenges. In 2016, USIP also facilitated a range of discussions that allowed U.S. and Chinese experts to share views on, for example, the causes of conflict in Burma, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Syria, or to identify opportunities for the U.S., China, and third countries to work together to promote peace in other conflict-affected countries.

Building Skills for Peace. USIP facilitates education, training, and exchanges for Chinese scholars, educators, and other key stakeholders. Drawing on the expertise residing in other USIP programs, the China Program aims to help key elements in the U.S., China, and third countries develop the institutional, legal, and technical capacity to resolve conflicts without violence.​

map of world with information on China

Related Publications

China’s Role in North Korea Nuclear and Peace Negotiations

China’s Role in North Korea Nuclear and Peace Negotiations

Monday, May 6, 2019

By: USIP China-North Korea Senior Study Group

This is the second in the Senior Study Group (SSG) series of USIP reports examining China’s influence on conflicts around the world. A group of fifteen experts met from September to December 2018 to assess China’s interests and influence in bringing about a durable settlement of the North Korean nuclear crisis. This report provides recommendations for the United States to assume a more effective role in shaping the future of North Korea in light of China’s role and interests. Unless otherwise sourced, all observations and conclusions are those of SSG members.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Where Does China’s Belt and Road Initiative Stand Six Years Later?

Where Does China’s Belt and Road Initiative Stand Six Years Later?

Thursday, April 25, 2019

By: Jennifer Staats

Few projects illustrate the risks of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) better than the Hambantota port in Sri Lanka. In 2017, unsustainable debt loads drove Colombo to give China a 99-year lease and controlling equity stake in the Hambantota port, while local communities protested the loss of sovereignty and international observers worried about China’s strategic intentions. The Hambantota case may be an outlier, but it has become a “canary in the coalmine,” and a warning sign to other BRI participants about what their future may hold. Increasingly, countries around the world are taking steps to reassert their influence over BRI projects—and Beijing has taken note.

Economics & Environment; Global Policy

China’s Engagement with Smaller South Asian Countries

China’s Engagement with Smaller South Asian Countries

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

By: Nilanthi Samaranayake

When the government of Sri Lanka struggled to repay loans used to build the Hambantota port, it agreed to lease the port back to China for 99 years. Some commentators have suggested that Sri Lanka, as well as other South Asian nations that have funded major infrastructure projects through China’s Belt and Road Initiative, are victims of “China’s debt-trap diplomacy.” This report finds that the reality is...

Economics & Environment

India-Pakistan Tensions Test China’s Relationships, Crisis Management Role

India-Pakistan Tensions Test China’s Relationships, Crisis Management Role

Thursday, March 7, 2019

By: Jacob Stokes; Jennifer Staats

The latest India-Pakistan crisis has put China in a difficult position, as it tries to balance its relationships with both countries, while helping to stave off a conflict and demonstrate its ability to manage and resolve crises. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke to leaders in both Pakistan and India last week, urging them to practice restraint and find a way to deescalate the situation. Despite Pakistan’s request for China to play a more active role, competing priorities constrained the degree to which Beijing could lead—highlighting a chronic challenge for Chinese diplomacy in South Asia. China’s decision to keep a low profile is likely deliberate and in keeping with longstanding practice, but it is inconsistent with Beijing’s aspirations to lead in Asian crisis diplomacy.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

View All Publications