On July 27, 2009, a panel of experts reviewed the destructive potential of a nuclear weapon, and discussed the role of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) as keystone agreements to halt the spread of nuclear weapons technology.

Overview

The world has witnessed sixty-four years pass since the 1945 nuclear attacks on Japan.  Few people today understand the immense power of these weapons – or steps taken by the global community to prevent any future use of them.

On July 27, 2009, a panel of experts reviewed the destructive potential of a nuclear weapon, and discussed the role of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) as the keystone agreements to halt the spread of nuclear weapons technology.

Additionally, the panel discussed the nonproliferation recommendations in America’s Strategic Posture: The Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States, facilitated by USIP, on U.S. actions to help halt the spread of nuclear weapons technology. Experts assessed the nuclear proliferation threats posed by Iran, North Korea and other countries, and how the NPT and other measures can help resolve the challenges they present.  Finally, experts presented their perspectives on additional nonproliferation measures that the U.S. and other countries could consider taking.

Speakers

  • Dr. George Ullrich
    Senior Vice President for Advanced Technology Programs, Science Applications International Corporation, and former Deputy Director of the Defense Nuclear Agency
  • Ms. Corey Hinderstein
    Director of International Programs, Nuclear Threat Initiative
  • Ms. Jenifer Mackby
    Fellow/Consultant, Center for Strategic and International Studies
  • COL Paul Hughes, U.S. Army (Ret.), Moderator
    Senior Program Officer, Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention, U.S. Institute of Peace, and Executive Director of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States

 

Related Publications

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Monday, February 12, 2024

Surprisingly, candidates aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan won the most seats in Pakistan’s elections. But while voters “have shown their faith in democracy,” the lack of a strong mandate for any specific leader or institution “doesn’t necessarily bode well for [Pakistan’s] stability,” says USIP’s Tamanna Salikuddin.

Type: Podcast

View All Publications