On behalf of Ambassador Richard Solomon, Chair of the Korea Working Group, the U.S. Institute of Peace cordially invites you to a joint CSIS-KEI-USIP public event

The UN Security Council has been working on a stringent resolution following North Korea's 2nd nuclear test on May 25. Irrespective of a reaffirmation of punitive measures listed in UN Security Council Resolution 1718 (passed in response to North Korea's Oct. 2006 nuclear test) or expanded measures in this new resolution, the key question will be enforcement. At present, a strong consensus has emerged among Washington, Tokyo, Seoul and Moscow to push forward on a tough resolution. Although Beijing has expressed its "resolute opposition" to North Korea's 2nd nuclear test, its initial response has been muted compared to how it reacted to the 1st nuclear test in Oct. 2006. Despite recent discussion in Beijing about cooperating with Washington on sanctions, it remains to be seen if Beijing will pursue symbolic gestures of enforcement or actually implement 1718-type measures in a sustained, coordinated manner this time round.

Speakers

  • Victor Cha
    CSIS Korea Chair, Center for Strategic & International Studies
    Professor, Georgetown University
    Former Asia Director, National Security Council
  • William Newcomb
    Former Senior Economic Advisor, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, U.S. Department of the Treasury
  • Charles (Jack) L. Pritchard
    President, Korea Economic Institute
    Former Special Envoy for Negotiations with the DPRK
  • John S. Park, Moderator
    Director, Korea Working Group, Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention, U.S. Institute of Peace

Archived Audio


To listen to audio or to view video, please click on the links provided below. You also can right click on the links and choose "Save Target As" or "Download Linked File." This will save the file to your computer and then allow you to play it in your media player directly.

Of Related Interest

Related Publications

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Monday, April 15, 2024

In recent years, North Korea has become more repressive, more impoverished and more allergic to the outside world. Already turning inward after the failure of diplomatic efforts in 2019, the North Korean government isolated itself further amid the global COVID-19 pandemic. North Korea has learned to operate, and Kim Jong Un has learned to rule, with greater levels of self-isolation than aggressive international sanctions regimes could ever hope to impose. Given North Korea’s current mode of rejecting even humanitarian assistance and its recent turn toward Russia, the chances for diplomatic breakthroughs with Pyongyang look like a wishful long-term hope at best.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

Monday, April 1, 2024

The greatest challenge to peaceful coexistence between North Korea and the United States is the technical state of war between the two countries. The United States and the Soviet Union may have been at ideological loggerheads, used proxies in regional conflicts and come close to direct superpower blows — but they were not in a state of war. Resolution of the Korean War should be set as a stated U.S. policy objective. This is a necessary Step Zero on the road to peaceful coexistence with North Korea today and could reduce the risk of deliberate or accidental conflict, nuclear or otherwise.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Monday, March 25, 2024

The September 13, 2023, meeting between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un in Russia’s Amur Oblast marked a significant crippling of the decades-long U.S. pressure-based approach toward North Korea. The strategy of isolating and pressuring North Korea through United Nations Security Council resolutions to compel its nuclear disarmament in exchange for providing normalized relations, economic aid and sanctions relief may or may not ever have been a winning strategy, but now is no longer viable. The strategy required cooperation among the United States, South Korea, China and Russia, but this now seems a distant prospect.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Building Trust through Health Cooperation with North Korea

Building Trust through Health Cooperation with North Korea

Monday, March 18, 2024

The United States needs to address the existing trust deficit with North Korea if it wants to coexist peacefully with that country. Trust building through health cooperation may be the least contentious way politically and the most likely to succeed. However, engagement on health and humanitarian assistance with North Korea, like security negotiations, has been undermined by geopolitics.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications