A public event co-sponsored by the U.S. Institute of Peace and the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars' North Korea International Documentation Project: This event has already taken place.

North Korea's 2009 New Year's editorial outlined plans for a "New Revolutionary Upsurge" to build "a great, prosperous and powerful nation" (kangsong taeguk). Drawing a direct parallel to Kim Il-sung's Chollima Movement of the late 1950s, Kim Jong-il is reported to have launched his new revolutionary upsurge in Kangson—the birthplace of the Chollima Movement—on December 24, 2008. It was heralded as a turning point in the development of the Party and revolution much like when Kim Il-sung set the Chollima Movement in motion in December 1956. While the Chollima upsurge was credited for building on the post-war debris "a strong country independent in politics, self-supporting in the economy and self-reliant in national defence," it remains to be seen where the Kim Jong-il regime will be able to draw on the resources required to "open the gate to a thriving nation in 2012."

The USIP-Woodrow Wilson Center conference will address the following sets of core questions:

(1) Context Analysis: What were the specific objectives of the Chollima Movement — the cited model for the "New Revolutionary Upsurge" highlighted in the 2009 New Year's editorial? What was the role of the Chollima Movement in regime solidification for Kim Il-sung?

(2) Capabilities Analysis: Where did North Korea get the resources to carry out the Chollima Movement goals? Where would North Korea get resources (funding and material) required for implementing the 2009 "New Revolutionary Upsurge"?

Agenda

  • Session 1:
    Insights on the Chollima Movement from Archival Material
    (James Person & Bernd Schaefer, Wilson Center's North Korea International Documentation Project)
  • Session 2:
    Relevance of the Chollima Movement to the 2009 "New DPRK Revolutionary Upsurge"—Can Regime Solidification in this Manner be Replicated?
    (John Park, USIP's Korea Working Group)
  • Session 3:
    Panel Discussant
    (Charles Armstrong, Columbia University's Center for Korean Studies)
  • Session 4:
    Q&A

 

Archived Audio

To listen to audio or to view video, please click on the links provided below. You also can right click on the links and choose "Save Target As" or "Download Linked File." This will save the file to your computer and then allow you to play it in your media player directly. More Audio Help.

 

Speakers

  • Charles Armstrong
    Director, Columbia University's Center for Korean Studies
  • John Park
    Director, Korea Working Group, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • James Person
    Program Associate, Wilson Center's North Korea International Documentation Project
  • Bernd Schaefer
    Senior Research Scholar, Wilson Center's North Korea International Documentation Project
  • Abiodun Williams, Moderator
    Vice President, Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention, U.S. Institute of Peace

 

Related Publications

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Monday, April 15, 2024

In recent years, North Korea has become more repressive, more impoverished and more allergic to the outside world. Already turning inward after the failure of diplomatic efforts in 2019, the North Korean government isolated itself further amid the global COVID-19 pandemic. North Korea has learned to operate, and Kim Jong Un has learned to rule, with greater levels of self-isolation than aggressive international sanctions regimes could ever hope to impose. Given North Korea’s current mode of rejecting even humanitarian assistance and its recent turn toward Russia, the chances for diplomatic breakthroughs with Pyongyang look like a wishful long-term hope at best.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

Monday, April 1, 2024

The greatest challenge to peaceful coexistence between North Korea and the United States is the technical state of war between the two countries. The United States and the Soviet Union may have been at ideological loggerheads, used proxies in regional conflicts and come close to direct superpower blows — but they were not in a state of war. Resolution of the Korean War should be set as a stated U.S. policy objective. This is a necessary Step Zero on the road to peaceful coexistence with North Korea today and could reduce the risk of deliberate or accidental conflict, nuclear or otherwise.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Monday, March 25, 2024

The September 13, 2023, meeting between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un in Russia’s Amur Oblast marked a significant crippling of the decades-long U.S. pressure-based approach toward North Korea. The strategy of isolating and pressuring North Korea through United Nations Security Council resolutions to compel its nuclear disarmament in exchange for providing normalized relations, economic aid and sanctions relief may or may not ever have been a winning strategy, but now is no longer viable. The strategy required cooperation among the United States, South Korea, China and Russia, but this now seems a distant prospect.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Building Trust through Health Cooperation with North Korea

Building Trust through Health Cooperation with North Korea

Monday, March 18, 2024

The United States needs to address the existing trust deficit with North Korea if it wants to coexist peacefully with that country. Trust building through health cooperation may be the least contentious way politically and the most likely to succeed. However, engagement on health and humanitarian assistance with North Korea, like security negotiations, has been undermined by geopolitics.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications