President Jamil Mahuad Witt of Ecuador
President Jamil Mahuad Witt of Ecuador

 

President Jamil Mahuad Witt of Ecuador and President Alberto Fujimori of Peru met with policymakers February 5, 1999 at the U.S. Institute of Peace to discuss lessons learned from the recent successful negotiations between the two countries. Presidents Mahuad and Fujimori signed the comprehensive Peace Accords on October 26, 1998, marking the end of the oldest border dispute in Latin America.

 

"Our peace agreement is very creative. With assistance from the international community the concept of sovereignty and property were split in Tiwinza allowing us to end our conflict while the pride of both our countries was respected," said Mahuad.

The agreement fully implements the frontier between the two countries by conclusively defining the common land border. At the same time, it sets the basis for future development of relations between both countries through a border integration agreement and a committee for confidence building and security measures.

Tiwinza was the final sticking point between the two nations. Both countries have soldiers buried there. The ground-breaking agreement gives Peru and Ecuador a fixed common border, while Ecuador maintains one-square-kilometer as private property within the borders of Peru.

"The peace treaty clears the way for reconciliation between our countries. There are no losers with this agreement. We now have a base for cooperation and sustainable development," said Fujimori.

President Alberto Fujimori of Peru
President Alberto Fujimori of Peru

As a consequence of the agreement both countries have been able to drastically reduce military expenditures and focus more money on social programs and economic development.

"We are grateful to President Mahuad and President Fujimori for their insights today. The accord not only avoided the prospect of new fighting between the two countries but gave us important lessons and illustrated the advantages of negotiations in which several other countries from the hemisphere played supporting roles. I believe these negotiations should be used as a model for other countries in future conflict negotiations," said Dr. Richard Solomon, president of the U.S. Institute of Peace.

Speakers

  • Jamil Mahuad Witt
    President of Ecuador
  • Alberto Fujimori
    President of Peru
  • Richard Solomon
    President, U.S. Institute of Peace

Media Inquiries

Please contact Ian Larsen (+1.202.429.3870) or Lauren Sucher (+1.202.429.3822) in the Office of Public Affairs and Communications.

Latest Publications

Baghdad Is Ready for a New Chapter in U.S.-Iraq Relations

Baghdad Is Ready for a New Chapter in U.S.-Iraq Relations

Thursday, April 25, 2024

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani met last week with U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House as part of a weeklong visit aimed at strengthening bilateral relations. The visit occurred amid several historic anniversaries and dangerous developments in the Middle East. April marks the 21st anniversary of the toppling of Saddam Hussein. Since 2003, the U.S.-Iraq relationship has witnessed many ups and downs. Even as tensions persist, particularly in relation to the U.S. troop presence in the country, al-Sudani’s visit — which featured the largest delegation Iraqis have brought to Washington — demonstrates Iraqi will to start a new chapter in the strategic partnership that goes beyond security.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Policy

Ukraine’s New U.S. Lifeline: Why It’s Vital and What’s Next

Ukraine’s New U.S. Lifeline: Why It’s Vital and What’s Next

Thursday, April 25, 2024

This week’s U.S. approval of nearly $61 billion in funds for Ukraine’s defense is a lifeline in the Ukrainians’ struggle against Russia’s unprovoked invasion and the assault on peace and rule of law in Europe and beyond. Ukrainian troops have been rationing ammunition, their lack of defensive missiles has exposed Ukrainian cities to Russian aerial attacks — and many military analysts predicted a probable collapse on part of Ukraine’s eastern defensive lines. While this U.S. action boosts Ukrainians’ capacities and morale, ending this war will need further funds, forces and security measures for those fighting and suffering for their survival — and for the redemption of international peace through rule of law.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Five Lessons from Guatemala’s 2023 Election

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Five Lessons from Guatemala’s 2023 Election

Thursday, April 25, 2024

When Bernardo Arévalo won the presidency last year, it left Guatemala’s corrupt old guard reeling. Arévalo and his anti-corruption Semilla Movement posed a direct threat to the power of Guatemala’s “pacto de los corruptos” — an alliance of government officials, politicians, prosecutors, judges, party financiers, state contractors and some wealthy families. The pact mobilized to overturn the election results. But Guatemala’s civil society, backed by U.S. and broader international support, was able to uphold the elections and advance democracy in the Central American nation.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Elections & Conflict

A Rising Philippines Faces a Crucial Year Ahead

A Rising Philippines Faces a Crucial Year Ahead

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

By virtue of its geography alone, the Philippines is arguably Southeast Asia’s most strategically important country. Yet its actual influence has tended to lag its potential due to decades of socioeconomic struggle and internal instability, especially in its restive southern island of Mindanao. In recent years, however, the Philippines has rapidly emerged as one of the most consequential countries in the Indo-Pacific, driven in large part by President Ferdinand Marcos’ transformative policies on national security, defense and foreign relations.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) marks a new phase in Beijing’s ongoing push to change the international security order. Through the GSI, China seeks to establish itself as a counterbalance to U.S. influence and to reshape security management in a number of strategically important regions. The GSI is still in the early stages of implementation, but it has already demonstrated the potential to disrupt the existing security framework in Southeast Asia. This may lead to increased polarization within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), with some member states aligning with the GSI and others remaining cautious due to their stronger affiliations with the United States.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications