Truth Commission: Commission for Reception, Truth, and Reconciliation
Duration: 2002 – 2005
Charter: UN Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET) Regulation 2001/10
Commissioners: 7
Report: Public report

 

Truth Commission: Commission for Reception, Truth, and Reconciliation (Comissão de Acolhimento, Verdade e Reconciliação de Timor-Leste, CAVR)

Dates of Operation: February 7, 2002 - October 31, 2005 (45 months)

Background: East Timor had taken steps toward decolonization from Portugal in 1974 after a revolution and change of administration in Lisbon. Several political parties were emerging, and there was disagreement regarding who would control East Timor. An internal conflict erupted between the Timorese Democratic Movement (UDT) and the Revolutionary Front for an Independent East Timor (FRETILIN) in November 1975. FRETILIN proclaimed independence, while a few days later Indonesia convened the parties apposed to FRETILIN, and they all agreed to annexation by Indonesia. Indonesia invaded East Timor on December 7, 1975 and maintained a repressive occupation for the next 24 years.

By the early 1990s, organization of resistance groups, increased media coverage and mounting international pressure to end the abuses led to a referendum in which seventy-eight percent of the Timorese voted for independence. Widespread violence broke out within hours, displacing over 200,000 and burning most buildings in the major cities. Many political groups siding with Indonesia fought alongside the Indonesian army. International peacekeeping troops were called in to quell the violence, and the United Nations Transitional Authority in East Timor was given official control. The Serious Crimes Unit was established in 1999 to address crimes that took place from January 1 to October 25, 1999, and in early 2002, UNTAET established the Commissions for Reception, Truth, and Reconciliation.

Charter: UN Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET) Regulation 2001/10, July 13, 2001. The commission was established as an independent statutory authority by the Conselho Nacional da Resistencia Timorense (CNRT) government.
          
Mandate: The Commission for Reception, Truth, and Reconciliation’s mandate was to investigate human rights violations committed there between April 1974 and October 1999, which resulted in the death of an estimated 200,000 East Timorese. It was also to facilitate reconciliation and reintegration of minor criminal offenders who submit confessions, through local "Community Reconciliation Processes"; and to recommend further measures to prevent future abuses and address the needs of victims.

Commissioners and Structure: The commission was comprised of seven members: five men and two women. It also included twenty-nine regional commissioners. Aniceto Guterres Lopes, a lawyer and human rights activist, chaired the commission.

Report: The Commission for Reception, Truth, and Reconciliation’s final report (in English) was handed over to the President Xanana Gusmao in October 2005 and released to the public in November of that year. It was entitled “Chega!” (“No more, stop, enough!”).

Findings:

Conclusions

  • The commission held 8 national hearings, conducted 1,048 research interviews, and received 7,760 victim statements.
  • It concluded that 102,800 Timorese deaths were directly attributable to the Indonesian occupation, including those who were killed and those who died from conflict related causes such as starvation, illness, etc.
  • The highest levels of government were implicated. Indonesian General Wiranto, Minister of Defense, and Chief of the Armed Forces, was specifically named in the report.

Recommendations

  • The Commission for Reception, Truth, and Reconciliation recommended that the government set up a reparations program and memorials to remember the victims as well as conduct further inquiry into mass graves and the fate of the disappeared.

Subsequent Developments:

Reforms

  • In June 2008, the Parliamentary Committee for Constitutional Issues, Justice, Public Administration, Local Power, and Government Legislation unanimously approved a Resolution on the implementation of the CAVR "Chega!" Report. The assembly of the parliament, however, still has not considered the report formally as of May 2009.
  • The government established a secretariat with the purpose of distributing the finding of the report, educating the public, and pushing for reform and follow-though on the recommendations.

Prosecutions

  • The work of the truth commission was complemented by a Serious Crimes Unit (SCU), a prosecutorial body within the UN mission in East Timor. Moreover, the Special Panels for Serious Crimes, a hybrid court, was authorized to investigate and prosecute the most serious offenders. The Special Panel convicted 84 individuals. Most of them were low-level defendants and 75 percent of the people indicted remain at large.
  • The Serious Crimes Unit issued a warrant for General Wiranto's arrest in 2004, but the Timorese leadership objected to the arrest warrant which was not forwarded to the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol).
  • In December 2004, the governments of Timor-Leste and Indonesia agreed to establish a Commission of Truth and Friendship (CTF), rather than pursuing a judicial process. This bilateral commission issued its report in July 2008 and acknowledged that the Indonesian military and police as well as the civilian government and militia groups bore responsibility for crimes against humanity committed in 1999.
  • The SCU was dissolved in 2005. However, in August 2006 the Security Council decided to reopen the serious crimes process to investigate crimes committed in 1999 (SC/Res/1704). The UN Serious Crimes Investigation Team began its work February 2008 but leaves the prosecution in the hands of the Timorese prosecutor-general.

Reparations

  • Civil society and parliamentarians are currently examining the establishment of a national reparations program. In early 2011, the debate of two bills that would establish such a program was further delayed after opposition from legislators. 

 

Sources:

Related Publications

Security and Justice in Post-Revolution Libya

Security and Justice in Post-Revolution Libya

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

By: Fiona Mangan; Christina Murtaugh with support from Ferdaouis Bagga

Three years after the death of Muammar Qaddafi and the end of the revolution in Libya, security and justice are stalled and elusive despite the proliferation of security providers. The power of the gun prevails over the rule of law. Many see no end in sight. Based on a nationwide survey and drawn from interviews and focus group sessions, this report—supported by the USIP and the Small Arms Survey—tracks security and justice in Libya from before the revolution through today, its realities, and...

Justice in Transition in Yemen

Justice in Transition in Yemen

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

By: Erica Gaston with Nadwa al-Dawsari

This research is part of a three-year United States Institute of Peace (USIP) project that explores how Yemen’s rule of law and local justice and security issues have been affected in the post-Arab Spring transition period. A complement to other analytical and thematic pieces, this large-scale mapping provides data on factors influencing justice provision in half of Yemen’s governorates. Its goal is to support more responsive programming and justice sector reform. Field research was managed b...

Civil Defense Groups

Civil Defense Groups

Thursday, July 31, 2014

By: Bruce “Ossie” Oswald

More than three hundred defense groups provide security to local communities in states around the world. While it is true that such groups can be a resource-efficient means for states to provide law and order to their communities, it is also true that they can worsen security.

Women's Access to Justice in Afghanistan

Women's Access to Justice in Afghanistan

Thursday, July 17, 2014

By: Erica Gaston; Tim Luccaro

Since the fall of the Taliban in 2002, gains in women’s rights and access to justice in Afghanistan have been remarkable, yet women’s rights remain extremely limited. How do women in Afghanistan seek justice when their rights are violated? What barriers do they face in pursuing justice or receiving a fair outcome? This report draws on interviews and focus group discussions held in Afghanistan in 2011 and 2012 to determine answers to these and related questions and to recommend ways forward. ...

Gender

View All Publications