Ukraine must not remain a country of great but unrealized potential. The International Monetary Fund package and other foreign assistance are helping stabilize Ukraine’s economy, but only an attractive business climate can result in the level of investment that will truly transform the country for the long term.

The Pretrivka market in Kiev, Ukraine, May 6, 2015. As the rest of Europe tries desperately to shrug off low inflation, Ukraine has added rapidly rising prices — officially up 61 percent, and perhaps more — to its long list of problems during its civil war with Russian-backed rebels. (Brendan Hoffman/The New York Times)
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Brendan Hoffman

Ukraine has the makings of a prosperous and diversified economy. Even under the present difficult conditions, Ukraine’s agricultural exports are booming – and the potential for expansion is tremendous. With the right investment climate, Ukraine can become a major information technology hub. It can also become energy independent and perhaps an energy exporter. Favorable wage levels and a central geographic location make Ukraine a highly attractive location for manufactures of all types. The tourism, consumer products, transportation and financial sectors all have great promise.

But much work remains to be done. The World Bank put Ukraine at 83rd place among 189 countries surveyed in its Ease of Doing Business report for 2016. This is lower than Belarus (44) or even Kyrgyzstan (67).

Despite the EuroMaidan Revolution, Ukraine -- fairly or not -- is seen as about as corrupt as it was during the Viktor Yanukovych kleptocracy. Transparency International’s 2014 Corruption Perception Index put Ukraine at 142nd of 175 countries surveyed, compared with a 144 ranking in 2013.

Direct foreign investment has fallen since the Maidan events. Investors don’t like uncertainly and that is what the Russian annexation of Crimea and assault on Donbas have wrought. But investors also don’t like a business climate characterized by insider deals, bribes and selective justice. And much of that remains in place.

The U.S. State Department’s 2015 report on Ukraine’s investment climate observed that “in practice, the court system is viewed as ineffectual, corrupt and in dire need of reform.” The lack of a proper legal system in Ukraine is the major reason why the U.S. share of direct foreign investment in Ukraine was only 1.9 percent in 2014.

Judicial reform is thus essential -- now. This must include the vetting, requalifying and, as needed, firing of existing judges and prosecutors -- and the hiring of new people untainted by the corruption of the past. Salaries of those who remain must be significantly increased to ward off bribery.

A level playing field – founded on rule of law -- will allow investors to compete based on who has the best product or service, not on who has the best political connections needed to obtain government contracts or concessions. Many of Ukraine’s tycoons are not businessmen at all. Rather, they obtained their fortunes from insider deals arranged with political actors and use their wealth to perpetuate privileged access to the state budget. Their influence corrupts the political and economic system and must end.

Investment is a vote of confidence; that vote remains elusive today for Ukraine. By focusing on reforms that foster an attractive investment climate, Ukraine’s leaders can set the stage for an era of sustained growth. Actions not words are needed for Ukraine to reach the tipping point -- when investors let the funds flow.

William B. Taylor is executive vice president of the U.S. Institute of Peace and former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine. Colin Cleary is a fellow at the United States Institute of Peace and former political counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. government. The Russian version was published by Novoye Vremya. Reposted with permission from Kyiv Post. This article was first published on Nov. 18, 2015.


Related Publications

In Russia’s Hybrid War on Europe, Moldova’s Critical Next 15 Months

In Russia’s Hybrid War on Europe, Moldova’s Critical Next 15 Months

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

A rising risk in southeast Europe is Russia’s sharpening of conflicts to block Moldova’s effort to join the European Union. The Kremlin is escalating a hybrid campaign to manipulate three Moldovan elections over the next 15 months. Moscow last week hosted the formation of a political bloc around its primary Moldovan ally, a fugitive billionaire convicted of the country’s worst-ever bank fraud — and sent a startling flood of pre-election cash that police seized at Moldova’s main airport. This is a critical season for Moldova’s democratic allies to help it defeat Russian disinformation and election subversion.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Ukraine’s New U.S. Lifeline: Why It’s Vital and What’s Next

Ukraine’s New U.S. Lifeline: Why It’s Vital and What’s Next

Thursday, April 25, 2024

This week’s U.S. approval of nearly $61 billion in funds for Ukraine’s defense is a lifeline in the Ukrainians’ struggle against Russia’s unprovoked invasion and the assault on peace and rule of law in Europe and beyond. Ukrainian troops have been rationing ammunition, their lack of defensive missiles has exposed Ukrainian cities to Russian aerial attacks — and many military analysts predicted a probable collapse on part of Ukraine’s eastern defensive lines. While this U.S. action boosts Ukrainians’ capacities and morale, ending this war will need further funds, forces and security measures for those fighting and suffering for their survival — and for the redemption of international peace through rule of law.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Whither NATO at 75?

Whither NATO at 75?

Thursday, April 11, 2024

NATO marked its 75th anniversary last week at a celebration in Brussels. While Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has injected the alliance with new life and resolve, the 32-member collective security pact is also wrestling with its future in a world of growing great power competition. In 2022, NATO formally identified for the first time China as a challenge to its interests and collective security. As NATO continues to support Ukraine and look to future global challenges, it also has internal issues to address, ranging from individual member defense spending to the problems posed by the need for collective decision-making among 32 members.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications