20120627-Pakistan-Frenetic-Pace-Wiki-TOB.jpg
Photo Credit: Wiki Commons/Khalid Mahmood

Pakistan watchers in Washington have been finding it increasingly difficult to keep pace with developments in Islamabad. First there were the events of 2011 – a year of crisis for the Pak-US relationship. Then there was more bad blood after Pakistan refused to reopen NATO supplies to Afghanistan and dug in on the issue of a formal apology from the U.S. for the 24 Pakistani soldiers killed in a NATO airstrike last November. And now there is extreme political frenzy within Pakistan – extreme even by Islamabad standards – in which the Pakistani Supreme Court dismissed Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani and then the government named a highly controversial politician as the new prime minister. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court Chief Justice's son has been embroiled in a high profile corruption scandal.

Predicting the political future even at the best of times requires no less than a crystal ball in Pakistan's case. But a few things are fairly clear.

First, the executive-judiciary tussle that has manifested itself time and again ever since Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry was reinstated over three years ago is here to stay. The gloves have come off as the Court has finally pulled the trigger on the PM for not complying with its long standing demand to write a letter to the Swiss authorities reopening corruption cases against President Asif Zardari. The incoming PM is certain to be put under the scanner immediately. Many believe that he may meet the same fate as his predecessor.

Second, President Zardari's choice to appoint Raja Parvez Ashraf as PM suggests that he is not as concerned about the credibility of the prime minister's office as many hoped. Ashraf was fairly discredited for his controversial role as Minister of Water and Power in Prime Minister Gilani's cabinet; he was eventually removed from the post. The opposition is already crying foul and shall continue to do so as Pakistan moves towards a general election in a few months. Politics thus is certain to become increasingly rowdy. Consequently, the space for the government to take tough stances on governance related issues – much needed as it is to get the Pakistani economy on track – will further shrink.

Third, Pakistani politics will have little time left to deal with the Pakistan-U.S. relationship. Already in the doldrums, Pakistani decision makers are likely to get so embroiled in the domestic scene that the U.S. relationship may only find the backburner. One can certainly not expect the environment to be conducive for too many bold decisions; in terms of the Pakistan-US relationship, these do not go hand in hand with the need to keep up popularity in an election year. Coupled with an increasingly domestic focus in the U.S. for the upcoming November elections and a growing sense of resentment towards Pakistan, expecting a major breakthrough in the bilateral equation may be too much to ask for.

All in all, a fairly gloomy year lies ahead as far as prospects for progress on any a number of these fronts.

Moeed Yusuf is South Asia Adviser at the U.S. Institute of Peace.


Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

View All Publications