This Special Report, authored by Program Officer Scott Snyder, is based on meetings of the working group that focused on political, economic, and security developments in North and South Korea.

About the Working Group

The United States Institute of Peace has held an ongoing series of working group meetings on U.S. policy toward the Korean peninsula since fall 1993, when a group was convened to examine policy options for dealing with the North Korean nuclear challenge.

Two Special Reports were issued in 1994. The first report, North Korea's Nuclear Program: Challenge and Opportunity for American Policy, addressed strategic and organizational aspects of an effort to achieve a negotiated solution to problems posed by North Korea's nuclear program. The second, The North Korean Nuclear Challenge: The Post-Kim Il Sung Phase Begins, provided a preliminary analysis of the Geneva Agreed Framework and examined the challenges posed by the political situation on the Korean peninsula following the death of Kim Il Sung.

A Coming Crisis on the Korean Peninsula?: The Food Crisis, Economic Decline, and Political Considerations, published in October 1996, explored prospective challenges to the coordination of U.S., South Korean, Japanese, and Chinese policies in the context of the difficult circumstances and circumscribed options currently faced by North Korea. North Korea's Decline and China's Strategic Dilemmas, an October 1997 report based on a research trip to the northeast China border with North Korea, analyzed Chinese perspectives on the two Koreas. Beyond the Financial Crisis: Challenges and Opportunities for U.S. Leadership, published in April 1998, detailed political and security implications of the Asian financial crisis.

This Special Report, authored by Program Officer Scott Snyder, is based on meetings of the working group that focused on political, economic, and security developments in North and South Korea. The meetings were held at the United States Institute of Peace in November and December 1997 and March 1998.

The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Institute of Peace, which does not advocate specific policies.


Related Publications

How Congress Can Help Improve Relations with North Korea

How Congress Can Help Improve Relations with North Korea

Thursday, May 9, 2024

Although the Constitution authorizes the president and the executive branch to lead foreign affairs, it also vests the legislative branch with responsibilities that impact the conduct of diplomacy and statecraft. These include the ability to “declare war,” “raise and support armies,” “regulate commerce with foreign nations” and approve treaties and diplomat appointments, as well as general oversight functions and power to appropriate money from the Treasury.

Type: Analysis

Global PolicyPeace Processes

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Increasing Information Access for the North Korean People

Monday, April 15, 2024

In recent years, North Korea has become more repressive, more impoverished and more allergic to the outside world. Already turning inward after the failure of diplomatic efforts in 2019, the North Korean government isolated itself further amid the global COVID-19 pandemic. North Korea has learned to operate, and Kim Jong Un has learned to rule, with greater levels of self-isolation than aggressive international sanctions regimes could ever hope to impose. Given North Korea’s current mode of rejecting even humanitarian assistance and its recent turn toward Russia, the chances for diplomatic breakthroughs with Pyongyang look like a wishful long-term hope at best.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

It’s Time to Resolve the Korean War

Monday, April 1, 2024

The greatest challenge to peaceful coexistence between North Korea and the United States is the technical state of war between the two countries. The United States and the Soviet Union may have been at ideological loggerheads, used proxies in regional conflicts and come close to direct superpower blows — but they were not in a state of war. Resolution of the Korean War should be set as a stated U.S. policy objective. This is a necessary Step Zero on the road to peaceful coexistence with North Korea today and could reduce the risk of deliberate or accidental conflict, nuclear or otherwise.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Monday, March 25, 2024

The September 13, 2023, meeting between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un in Russia’s Amur Oblast marked a significant crippling of the decades-long U.S. pressure-based approach toward North Korea. The strategy of isolating and pressuring North Korea through United Nations Security Council resolutions to compel its nuclear disarmament in exchange for providing normalized relations, economic aid and sanctions relief may or may not ever have been a winning strategy, but now is no longer viable. The strategy required cooperation among the United States, South Korea, China and Russia, but this now seems a distant prospect.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications