How is it possible to do community policing in the absence of trust between citizens and security forces? This is just one of the questions that challenged an international group of experts as they explored the role of police and citizens, especially women, in countering violent extremism (CVE), during a workshop hosted by USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding. 

Nigerian soldiers survey passing civilians in the government reserved area of Maiduguri, in north-eastern Nigeria, July 19, 2011. An Islamist insurgency that has haunted northern Nigeria appears to be branching out and collaborating with al-Qaida's affiliates, alarming Western officials and analysts who had previously viewed the militants here as a largely isolated, if deadly, menace. (Samuel James/The New York Times)
Nigerian soldiers survey passing civilians in the government reserved area of Maiduguri, in north-eastern Nigeria. An Islamist insurgency that has haunted northern Nigeria appears to be branching out. Photo Credit: The NYT/ Samuel James

The workshop grew out of the institute’s Women Preventing Extremist Violence (WPEV) Project, which aims to work with women civic activists in Kenya and Nigeria to foster relationships with police in an effort to build community resilience to violence.

The July 2014 meeting, entitled “Women Preventing Extremist Violence Expert Workshop: Examining the Parameters of Police-Community Engagement in Countering Violent Extremism,” gathered a  mixed group of participants--security sector and gender experts from the United States, civic activists from Kenya and Nigeria, and police from Turkey and the United Kingdom. They defined effective community policing as a partnership between the police and the community to guarantee safety and security for both men and women.

How can communities develop mutually beneficial community policing strategies to reflect the needs of all citizens—men, women, boys and girls?

While community policing is not a new concept, the reality of providing security in transitional areas is complicated by a lack of effective and accountable institutions and basic lack of trust between civilians and the forces that are supposed to protect them. With conditions such as these, how can communities develop mutually beneficial community policing strategies to reflect the needs of all citizens—men, women, boys and girls?

The answer is that there is no one-size-fits-all approach. What emerged from the facilitated discussion, collective brainstorming activities and emblematic case studies was that good community policing is highly dependent on context, must be supported by the community, and is not always done by official police forces.  

The workshop findings provided a foundation for a USIP Special Report. The publication is intended to guide practitioners on developing and designing community policing programs, the role of women in those programs and the implications for CVE strategies.

The experts honed in on the attributes that must exist in a security force for it to be capable of undertaking community policing roles. Unsurprisingly, the experts identified legitimacy, honesty, fairness, transparency, responsiveness and accountability as key characteristics for both the institution as well as the individual members of the force. The workshop participants  also determined that police forces  need to reflect the communities in which they work and hold shared values.

Another key outcome of the discussion was the idea that community policing is not done by the police alone, but that security is a shared responsibility for the police force and its citizens. As a result, a strong relationship based on clear communication between citizens and the police is necessary for a community policing strategy to succeed.

Experts assessed three case studies: one from northern Nigeria, another involving the Somali diaspora in London, and a third from Korogocho in Nairobi, Kenya. Participants mapped the existence of the necessary attributes for effective police-community engagement. Each case had some but not all of the attributes, and the variations among the cases reinforced the importance of context.

In some cases, racial or religious profiling undermined community policing efforts. In other situations, colonial-era policing structures impeded responsiveness to community needs. Policing structures have changed little since Nigeria’s and Kenya’s colonial eras,  when the purpose of the forces was to repress citizens rather than provide them with security.

Each case, however, demonstrated a key requirement that is pivotal to effectiveness: constant and clear communication between the police force and its citizens.

Shannon Zimmerman is a senior program specialist and Megan Loney is a program assistant, both in USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding. They work on the WPEV project and helped organize and coordinate the expert workshop.

Related Publications

The Latest: Three Things to Know About the U.S.-Africa Security Partnership

The Latest: Three Things to Know About the U.S.-Africa Security Partnership

Thursday, June 22, 2023

By: Oluwafemi Gbadebo;  Stanley Makgohlo

USIP’s African Diplomat Seminar offers newly arrived diplomats a chance to connect with the U.S. policymakers, agencies and departments working on advancing U.S.-Africa policy. Stanley Makgohlo, political counselor at the South African Embassy, and Oluwafemi Gbadebo, minister in the Nigerian Embassy, discuss how the seminar has helped their work at the nexus of peace and development and how the growing U.S.-Africa partnership can help address the challenges facing their country.

Type: Blog

Global Policy

Disengaging and Reintegrating Violent Extremists in Conflict Zones

Disengaging and Reintegrating Violent Extremists in Conflict Zones

Tuesday, May 16, 2023

By: Andrew Glazzard

Dealing with people who leave violent extremist groups has become one of the most pressing security issues of our time. Drawing on new primary research conducted by the author in Iraq, Syria, and Nigeria, and existing research on disengagement and reintegration, this report underscores the challenges of administering rehabilitation programs in conditions of chronic insecurity—and of doing so at a scale sufficient to make a difference to hundreds or even thousands of people in short order.

Type: Peaceworks

Violent Extremism

After Nigeria’s Elections: Nurturing the Seeds of Better Democracy

After Nigeria’s Elections: Nurturing the Seeds of Better Democracy

Thursday, April 13, 2023

By: Chris Kwaja

Nigeria’s latest elections heighten the country’s need for a reset of its democracy. Nigeria’s two dominant parties abandoned an informal pact that has rotated power between north and south, papering over the deeper, wider problem of ensuring real political inclusion among Nigeria’s disparate regions and communities. The recent national and state-level votes failed to deliver anguished Nigerians the promise of wider voter participation and transparent election results. Still, the campaigns and voting contained seeds for critical change that now must be cultivated by Nigeria’s newly elected government; its courageous, pro-democracy civil society; its vast, energized youth population; and its partners.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & Governance

Nigeria’s Vote Signals Risks: How Its Partners Can Support Democracy

Nigeria’s Vote Signals Risks: How Its Partners Can Support Democracy

Thursday, March 9, 2023

By: James Rupert

Nigeria’s disputed election 12 days ago is raising protest at home and concern abroad over its implications for the strength of democracy in that country and across Africa. Yesterday’s new wrinkle was the postponement of this week’s planned election for Nigerian state governors. Nigeria’s electoral commission is working to fix problems in a vote management system that failed to transparently process and report a result on February 25. An erosion of democracy’s credibility in Africa’s most populous nation would be catastrophic.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Elections & Conflict

View All Publications