On April 1 the United States Institute of Peace and the Faith & Politics Institute cosponsored a special workshop on Capitol Hill to engage participants in an exploration of the potential role for faith, and the faithful, in promoting peace in the Middle East.

Can faith play a positive role in managing virulent international conflicts and building and promoting peace around the globe? Nowhere is this conflict more evident than in the Middle East. Religious differences often drive misunderstanding and even hatred, yet among the tumult, there is a faithful contingent striving to delegitimize violence in the Middle East.

On April 1 the United States Institute of Peace and the Faith & Politics Institute cosponsored a special workshop on Capitol Hill to engage participants in an exploration of the potential role for faith, and the faithful, in promoting peace in the Middle East. Co-moderated by David Smock, director of the Religion and Peacemaking Initiative at the U.S. Institute of Peace, and Rev. W. Douglas Tanner, Jr., president of the Faith & Politics Institute, the workshop featured:

  • Canon Andrew White
    Representative of the Archbishop of Canterbury to the Middle East
    Over the past few years, Canon White has acted as the negotiator in many conflict situations including the siege of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem and the riots between Muslims and Christians in Northern Nigeria. His particular interest is in the Middle East, where he chairs the religious track of the Middle East peace process. He is also very involved in Iraq, being a regular visitor to Baghdad, where he has worked with both the political and religious leadership.
  • Yehezkel Landau
    International Relations Director, Open House, Israel
    Mr. Landau's work has been primarily in the field of interfaith education and Jewish-Arab peacemaking. He lectures internationally on Jewish-Christian-Muslim relations and has authored numerous journal articles and is co-editor of the book Voices from Jerusalem: Jews and Christians Reflect on the Holly Land. For the 2002-2003 academic year, he is a faculty associate in interfaith relations at Hartford Seminary.
  • Mohammed Abu-Nimer
    Assistant Professor of International Peace and Conflict Resolution, American University
    Professor Abu-Nimer is an expert on conflict resolution and dialogue for peace. As a practitioner, he has been intervening and conducting conflict resolution training workshops in Palestine, Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Ireland, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Sierra Leone, and the United States. His most recent book is entitled Peace Building and Nonviolence in the Islamic Context: Theory and Practice.

Can faith play a positive role in managing virulent international conflicts and building and promoting peace around the globe? Nowhere is this conflict more evident than in the Middle East. Religious differences often drive misunderstanding and even hatred, yet among the tumult, there is a faithful contingent striving to delegitimize violence in the Middle East.

On April 1 the United States Institute of Peace and the Faith & Politics Institute cosponsored a special workshop on Capitol Hill to engage participants in an exploration of the potential role for faith, and the faithful, in promoting peace in the Middle East. Co-moderated by David Smock, director of the Religion and Peacemaking Initiative at the U.S. Institute of Peace, and Rev. W. Douglas Tanner, Jr., president of the Faith & Politics Institute, the workshop featured:

  • Canon Andrew White
    Representative of the Archbishop of Canterbury to the Middle East
    Over the past few years, Canon White has acted as the negotiator in many conflict situations including the siege of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem and the riots between Muslims and Christians in Northern Nigeria. His particular interest is in the Middle East, where he chairs the religious track of the Middle East peace process. He is also very involved in Iraq, being a regular visitor to Baghdad, where he has worked with both the political and religious leadership.
  • Yehezkel Landau
    International Relations Director, Open House, Israel
    Mr. Landau's work has been primarily in the field of interfaith education and Jewish-Arab peacemaking. He lectures internationally on Jewish-Christian-Muslim relations and has authored numerous journal articles and is co-editor of the book Voices from Jerusalem: Jews and Christians Reflect on the Holly Land. For the 2002-2003 academic year, he is a faculty associate in interfaith relations at Hartford Seminary.
  • Mohammed Abu-Nimer
    Assistant Professor of International Peace and Conflict Resolution, American University
    Professor Abu-Nimer is an expert on conflict resolution and dialogue for peace. As a practitioner, he has been intervening and conducting conflict resolution training workshops in Palestine, Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Ireland, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Sierra Leone, and the United States. His most recent book is entitled Peace Building and Nonviolence in the Islamic Context: Theory and Practice.

Latest Publications

What Haiti Needs from the U.S. and International Community

What Haiti Needs from the U.S. and International Community

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Despite obvious distractions from crises in other corners of the world, Haiti’s deepening disaster is belatedly drawing wider international attention. Critics of U.S. policy toward Haiti are emerging from all corners of the political spectrum — and there is much to be critical of, particularly if the timeframe is stretched to cover Haiti's political experience since the late 1980s and the transition from the Duvalier dictatorships. But in the here and now, these assessments short charge the admittedly tough odds of the most recent Caribbean Community- (CARICOM) managed mediation efforts from which has emerged Haiti’s Presidential Council, a transitional governance structure for the country.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Policy

In Russia’s Hybrid War on Europe, Moldova’s Critical Next 15 Months

In Russia’s Hybrid War on Europe, Moldova’s Critical Next 15 Months

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

A rising risk in southeast Europe is Russia’s sharpening of conflicts to block Moldova’s effort to join the European Union. The Kremlin is escalating a hybrid campaign to manipulate three Moldovan elections over the next 15 months. Moscow last week hosted the formation of a political bloc around its primary Moldovan ally, a fugitive billionaire convicted of the country’s worst-ever bank fraud — and sent a startling flood of pre-election cash that police seized at Moldova’s main airport. This is a critical season for Moldova’s democratic allies to help it defeat Russian disinformation and election subversion.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Nine Things to Know About Myanmar’s Conflict Three Years On

Nine Things to Know About Myanmar’s Conflict Three Years On

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

On March 28, 2021, barely two months after the February 1 coup in Myanmar, a minor skirmish erupted at the Tarhan protest in Kalay township in central Sagaing region as demonstrators took up makeshift weapons to defend themselves against ruthless assaults by the junta’s security forces. This was the first recorded instance of civilian armed resistance to the military’s violent crackdown on peaceful protesters since the February 1 coup d’état.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Bangladesh’s Growing Role in Maritime Security

Bangladesh’s Growing Role in Maritime Security

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Despite several years of relative calm, piracy is back in the western Indian Ocean. When the Houthis began attacking international shipping in the Red Sea in late 2023, Somali pirates saw an opportunity to conduct attacks on ships off the Horn of Africa.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Blinken’s China Trip Shows Both Sides Want to Stabilize Ties

Blinken’s China Trip Shows Both Sides Want to Stabilize Ties

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken traveled to China last week as part of a series of recent high-level contacts between Washington and Beijing. Although no major breakthroughs came out of the trip, it demonstrates that both sides want to prevent bilateral ties from sinking any lower, even as U.S.-China competition continues to intensify.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications